النص الشعري:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1257 البيتُ الاول:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1259 البيتُ الثاني:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1262 البيتُ الثالث:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1266 البيتُ الأخير والمتمم:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1267
❤1
Signed Omar Ali

Channel
@Omar_2i
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,369subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001997798758 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Omar_2i |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Omar_2i |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 1,369 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 1,365 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 1,372 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,378 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 1,380 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 1,377 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 1,376 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 1,377 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,096 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
63 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 81.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
النص الشعري:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1257 البيتُ الاول:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1259 البيتُ الثاني:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1262 البيتُ الثالث:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1266 البيتُ الأخير والمتمم:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1267
❤1
Signed Omar Ali
تم إعراب النص❤️
❤2
Signed Omar Ali
النص الشعري:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1232 البيتُ الأول:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1234 البيتُ الثاني:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1235 البيتُ الثالث:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1236 البيتُ الرابع:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1251 البيتُ الخامس:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1252 البيتُ الأخير والمتمم:- https://t.me/Nohat_2i/1253
❤2
Signed Omar Ali
🛑 شذرات نحوية:- قَالَ أَحْمَدُ شوقِيٌ:- لَكَ أَن تَلومَ وَلي مِنَ الأَعذارِ أَنَّ الهَوى قَدَرٌ مِنَ الأَقدارِ ما كُنتُ أَسلَمُ لِلعُيونِ سَلامَتي وَأُبيحُ حادِثَةَ الغَرامِ وَقاري عندما نأتي الى إعراب محل المصدرين المؤولين سنجد الأول له وجه واحد والثاني له وجهان:- 🛑الأول:- المصدر المؤول "ان تلوم" في محل رفع مبتدأ موخر والتقدير "لك لومك" 🛑الثاني:- له وجهان وفي كل وجه يختلف تعليق شبه الجملة "من الاعذار" الوجه الأول:-…
❤3
Signed Omar Ali
وردني سؤال:- قَالَ الشَّاعِرُ:- هْذَا ولو قَدَرَتْ عَلَيْكَ رِمَاحُ قَوْمي مَا آنتَهَيْنَا ما إعراب "هذا"؟ ما تعليق شبه الجملة الواردة في البيت؟ :- هذا:-الهاء:-حرف للتنبيه ذا:-اسم إشارة مبني على السكون في محل رفع مبتدأ والخبر محذوف تقديره "هذا بيان" كمثل قول الله تعالى:- {هذا بيان لِّلنَّاسِ وهدى وموعظة لِلْمُتَّقِينَ} وكذلك قول الشَّاعر:- هذَا وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ يَعْلَمُ وَحْدَهُ أَيَّانَ مُرْسَاهَا وَكَيْفَ تَؤُولُ اي…
❤1
Signed Omar Ali
🛑تنبيه:- هنا لايجوز ان نجعل"أجمعا" توكيد ل"منتهى" البتة وإنما نجعلها توكيد ل "الذم" والسبب في ذلك هو قولك إن "أجمع" توكيد معنوي يفيد الاحاطة والشمول لان الذم هو جنسا عاما وهو مما يليق به التوكيد بينما المنتهى فهي (غاية ونهاية والحد والغاية اقل القليل) لذلك جعلها توكيد على الذم الواسع الشامل اشبه مما جعلها توكيدا"منتهى" التي وضعت على ما كان ضيقا مما لايوكد بلفظ دال على الاحاطة والشمول
🤔1
Signed Omar Ali
🛑شذرات نحوية:- قَالَ حَاتَمُ بْنُ عَبِد اللهِ الطَّائيّ:- وإنّكَ مهما تعطِ بطنَكَ سؤلَهُ وفرجَكَ نالا منتهى الذّمّ أجمعا يجوز في إعراب "مهما" ثلاث وجوه:- الوجه الأول:- اسم شرط جازم مبني على السكون في محل نصب مفعول مطلق ناب عن المصدر والتقدير أيَّ إعطاء تعط بطنَكَ سؤلَهُ الوجه الثاني:- اسم شرط جازم مبني على السكون في محل نصب مفعول به ثان للفعل"تعط" وستكون "بطنك" مفعول به أول سوله:- ستكون بدل من "بطنك" الوجه الثالث:- …
❤1
Signed Omar Ali
https://t.me/Nohat_2i
❤4
Signed Omar Ali
🛑شذرات نحوية:- قَالَ الشَّاعِرُ:- نَنظُر سُلَيمَى فإن ضَنَّت بنائِلٍها عَنَّا انصَرَفنا وماذا يَنَفعُ النَّظَرُ يجوز في إعراب"ماذا" ثلاث وجوه:- الوجه الأول:- اسم استفهام مبني على السكون في محل نصب مفعول به مقدم للفعل "ينفع" الوجه الثاني:- اسم استفهام مبني على السكون في محل رفع مبتدأ وذا اسم موصول هو خبر له والجملة الفعلية هي صلة الموصول لاسم الموصول فالكوفيون يجعلون جميع اسماء الإشارة هي اسم موصول لكن البصريون خالفوه…
❤3
Signed Omar Ali
«أما الفؤادُ ففيكَ يَحيا دائمًا واللهِ ما كذب الشعورُ ولا افترى!»
❤5👏1
Signed Omar Ali
ألَا ليتَ شِعري هَل أبِيتنّ ليلةً أُنَاظِرُ عينَاهُ وَالبَدر شَاهِدُ!
❤13
Signed Omar Ali
يا رَبِّ إن لَمْ أكُن أهلاً لمَكْرُمَةٍ فأنْتَ أهلٌ لإِعطَائِي بِلا سَبَبِ.
❤9❤🔥3🥰2
Signed Omar Ali
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Omar_2i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المُمَهِّدُ لِلُّغَةِ الْعَرَبيَّةِ.” (@Omar_2i), 1,369 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Omar_2i.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.