Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OMETV

Bot

OMETV

@OmeTVFBot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

12,166monthly users

-1,668 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID8340710280
TypeBot
Username@OmeTVFBot
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OmeTVFBot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,07413,83411,9547 August 2026 — 13,834 monthly users10 August 2026 — 13,584 monthly users13 August 2026 — 13,238 monthly users16 August 2026 — 12,652 monthly users19 August 2026 — 11,381 monthly users21 August 2026 — 11,381 monthly users21 August 2026 — 10,139 monthly users24 August 2026 — 10,074 monthly users28 August 2026 — 10,269 monthly users31 August 2026 — 10,463 monthly users4 September 2026 — 10,703 monthly users6 September 2026 — 10,820 monthly users9 September 2026 — 10,849 monthly users12 September 2026 — 11,633 monthly users15 September 2026 — 11,883 monthly users17 September 2026 — 12,166 monthly users12,1667 August 202617 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1,668. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,510–14,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:0012,166+283
15 Sept 2026, 13:1811,883+250
12 Sept 2026, 03:1711,633+784
9 Sept 2026, 20:1710,849+29
6 Sept 2026, 16:1610,820+117
4 Sept 2026, 08:1710,703+240
31 Aug 2026, 01:5410,463+194
28 Aug 2026, 00:1810,269+195
24 Aug 2026, 23:3410,074-65
21 Aug 2026, 21:2610,139-1,242
21 Aug 2026, 18:1711,381no change
19 Aug 2026, 16:2811,381-1,271
16 Aug 2026, 16:4512,652-586
13 Aug 2026, 11:5713,238-346
10 Aug 2026, 13:5513,584-250
7 Aug 2026, 19:3213,834first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OMETV” (@OmeTVFBot), 12,166 monthly users as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OmeTVFBot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.