اگه دوست داری از آیتم های دوره شیرینی سنتی مطلع بشی 🍭 شماره تو به آیدی زیر بفرست 👇👇👇👇👇👇 @lavazemqannadi_omid @lavazemqannadi_omid
❤12
Signed Fatemeh Gholami

Channel
@OmidShirinii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
61,237subscribers
-904 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001167216010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OmidShirinii |
| Description | مرجع آموزش شیرینی پزی اینجاست🫡 همه چی از کف قنادی شروع شد🥐 برای اطلاعات از دوره های تخصصی من و مشاوره رایگان با کارشناس های مجموعه اینجا پیام بدین 👇🌱 @lavazemqannadi_omid @lavazemqannadi_omid شماره واتساپ 📞09016381987 📞 #امید_شیرینی |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OmidShirinii |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 61,237 | -52 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:20 | 61,289 | -28 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:17 | 61,317 | -19 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:48 | 61,336 | -24 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:01 | 61,360 | -20 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:37 | 61,380 | -17 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:31 | 61,397 | -23 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:01 | 61,420 | -33 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:59 | 61,453 | -30 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 61,483 | +46 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 61,437 | +4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 61,433 | -26 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 61,459 | -25 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 61,484 | -22 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 61,506 | -25 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:31 | 61,531 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 61,543 | -20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 61,563 | -23 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:26 | 61,586 | -35 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 61,621 | first reading |
148 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 176 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 148 (30 July 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 443,200 |
| Reactions total | 8,686 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 23:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19,696 reactions across 147 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14,386 | 73.0% | |
| 👍 | 2,432 | 12.3% | |
| 👏 | 1,246 | 6.33% | |
| 🙏 | 585 | 2.97% | |
| 🥰 | 253 | 1.28% | |
| 😍 | 193 | 0.98% | |
| 🔥 | 178 | 0.904% | |
| 🤔 | 173 | 0.878% | |
| 👌 | 42 | 0.213% | |
| 🖕 | 34 | 0.173% | |
| 🤷♀ | 34 | 0.173% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 0.127% | |
| 🥱 | 25 | 0.127% | |
| 🤡 | 19 | 0.096% | |
| 💊 | 14 | 0.071% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 0.066% | |
| 😨 | 11 | 0.056% | |
| 🍌 | 9 | 0.046% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 0.046% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 0.036% | |
| 3 further kinds | 8 | 0.041% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 147 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,696 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 88 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اگه دوست داری از آیتم های دوره شیرینی سنتی مطلع بشی 🍭 شماره تو به آیدی زیر بفرست 👇👇👇👇👇👇 @lavazemqannadi_omid @lavazemqannadi_omid
❤12
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
حالا خودت حساب کن اینکه الان شروع به فروش کنی 😉 و چند تا سوپر مارکت توی سطح شهر ازت بخرن 🛒 📚به نظرت ارزش تلاش کردن و آموزش دیدن رو نداره؟
👍28🥱2
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
⚠️✅میدونی خوبی این کار چیه؟ اینکه کیک و شیرینی های سنتی عمدتا مواد نگهدارنده دارن و یا از مواد اولیه با کیفیت پایین درست شدن 😢 اما شیرینی که شما تحویل سوپر مارکت میدید، مواد نگهدارنده نداره، و از مواد اولیه با کیفیت تر درست شده👍
❤31🤡3
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
‼️اگه دقت کرده باشید میبینید که جدیدا توی سوپر مارکت ها حتی آیتم های کافه ای مثل چیز کیک و تیرامیسو فروش میره 🎯 حالا خیلی از این سوپر مارکت ها هستن که با جعبه های بزرگ، شیرینی های سنتی میفروشن 🎳 حالا هر مدلی 🍪
❤22
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
🛒باورتون میشه حتی به سوپر مارکت ها هم میشه شیرینی فروخت؟ 🛍حالا بیا بهت یگم چجوری؟
👍32👎2
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
برشتوک سنتی 🤌 بدون فر رسپیش اینجاست 👇 رسپی خانگی 300 گرم آرد سفید 300 گرم آرد نخودچی 400 گرم کره نیوزلندی 400 گرم خاک قند وانل نک قاشق هل نک قاشق رسپی شکلات ماکات 100 گرم شکلات ما تخته ای 10 گرم روغن مایع 5 گرم صاف 50 رو حرارت قیر مستقیم بنماری کنید طرزتهیه آرد معمولی و آرد نخودی رو به مدت 10 الی 15 دقیقه تفت بدین بعدش کره و خاک قند رو به مدت 5 الی 10 دقیقه هم بزنید جایگزین کره روغن صافه بعدش آرد های کاملا سرد ش…
❤83
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
اگه دوست داری از آیتم های دوره شیرینی سنتی مطلع بشی 🍭 شماره تو به آیدی زیر بفرست 👇👇👇👇👇👇 @lavazemqannadi_omid @lavazemqannadi_omid
❤35
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
⚠️‼️اینم از خبر خوشمون ویدیو رو تا آخر ببینید🧩😊
❤77😍7
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
⚠️یه خبر خوش داریم واسه افرادی که دارن دوره شیرینی های سنتی رو ثبت نام میکنن ‼️ بیاید بهتون بگم💯
❤50🍌1
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
اسم این شیرینی جذاب رو کی میدونه؟😊
😍80👏33
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
اگه دوست داری از آیتم های دوره شیرینی سنتی مطلع بشی 🍭 شماره تو به آیدی زیر بفرست 👇👇👇👇👇👇 @lavazemqannadi_omid @lavazemqannadi_omid
❤36
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
‼️شاید فکر کنید درست کردن شیرینی های سنتی به روش قنادی سخت باشه اما باید بگم هنرجوهامون توی خونه شیرینی ها رو با کیفیت تر از قنادی درست میکنن✅👍
❤72🤣4
Signed Fatemeh Gholami
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @OmidShirinii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 4 posts on @OmidShirinii as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OmidShirinii named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“امید شیرینی Omid Shirinii” (@OmidShirinii), 61,237 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OmidShirinii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.