Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Omniscient Reader viewpoint/𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐋

Channel

Omniscient Reader viewpoint/𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐋

@Omniscient_Reader_viewpointH

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,521subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001925743850
TypeChannel
Username@Omniscient_Reader_viewpointH
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Omniscient_Reader_viewpointH

Growth

1,5211,5231,52225 August 2026 — 1,522 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,523 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,521 subscribers25 August 202628 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,521–1,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 09:111,521-2
25 Aug 2026, 15:541,523+1
25 Aug 2026, 11:451,522first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 8 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,667 reactions across 10 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
85251.1%
🔥26215.7%
😭20212.1%
👍1589.48%
👀503.00%
402.40%
🏆291.74%
❤‍🔥171.02%
🤣140.84%
🖕120.72%
🆒60.36%
💋40.24%
30.18%
👎30.18%
🕊30.18%
🐳20.12%
👏20.12%
💯20.12%
😨20.12%
🍓10.06%
3 further kinds30.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,667 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2024 to 21 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2024, 00:13 UTC≈11,100 views103 reactionsread 25 August 2026

چپتراش اصلاح شدن..

👀5035👍9💋43💅1🖕1

21 Jul 2024, 00:12 UTC≈12,700 views127 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍86314👎3😨2🖕1

17 May 2024, 05:16 UTC≈14,800 views228 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

141😭51👍136🆒6❤‍🔥4🏆3🕊3

14 Apr 2024, 20:53 UTC≈13,800 views197 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

😭14034👍96❤‍🔥3🏆3🔥1🖕1

5 Apr 2024, 07:45 UTC≈13,400 views177 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥12624😭11👍732🏆2❤‍🔥1

31 Mar 2024, 10:04 UTC≈12,800 views171 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥11825❤‍🔥9👍85🏆3🐳2🖕1

8 Mar 2024, 01:09 UTC≈12,300 views175 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

151👍75🔥5🏆4💯2🖕1

8 Mar 2024, 01:09 UTC≈12,800 views155 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

135🏆6👍6🔥32🤣2🖕1

8 Mar 2024, 01:09 UTC≈12,200 views158 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

134👍7🏆4🔥43🖕3👏2🙊1

8 Mar 2024, 01:08 UTC≈11,400 views176 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

142🤣12👍6🔥54🏆4🍓1🖕1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Omniscient_Reader_viewpointH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐇𝐖𝐀
@hellmanhwa · 51,852
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Omniscient Reader viewpoint/𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐋” (@Omniscient_Reader_viewpointH), 1,521 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Omniscient_Reader_viewpointH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.