Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for THE HEARTBREAK CLUB: On The Mend.

Channel

THE HEARTBREAK CLUB: On The Mend.

@OnTheMend

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

333subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009785942
TypeChannel
Username@OnTheMend
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 17 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OnTheMend

Growth

333342337.56 August 2026 — 342 subscribers6 August 2026 — 342 subscribers15 August 2026 — 341 subscribers22 August 2026 — 337 subscribers29 August 2026 — 336 subscribers5 September 2026 — 333 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 332–343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:20333-3
29 Aug 2026, 02:07336-1
22 Aug 2026, 15:29337-4
15 Aug 2026, 01:12341-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:33342no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:34342first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6978.4%
💔1921.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2024 to 2 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jan 2025, 11:20 UTC≈2,390 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ “Cupid missed, but we won’t miss the joy of new beginnings!” It feels like a cruel curse, a reminder that while the world revolves and turns, some souls remain tethered to the pain of what once was. As we stand on the beginning page of a new year, we embrace the spirit of renewal and the promise of fresh starts—but can we, really? The refusal to heal is too immense; yet time ticks on and life goes on

10💔9

25 Dec 2024, 10:22 UTC≈1,820 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Wishing our Breakie a Merry Christmas filled with warmth, love, and joy! May your days be as bright as the holiday lights and your heart as full as Santa’s bag of gifts 🎁🎄 From all of us at @ONTHEMEND, we hope this season brings you endless smiles and cherished memories. Stay cozy, and remember, you're always in our hearts this Christmas and beyond! ✨️

13💔3

5 May 2024, 14:21 UTC≈4,490 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Breakie! Check out our curated weekly mixtape, part of our weekly events: Share A Song Sunday Featuring a compilation of tunes handpicked by our members. This playlist is a melodic mosaic of songs that come highly recommended by our associates. Tune in and discover a sonic journey crafted by music enthusiasts just like you. Welcome to our first week of #SASS, we hope it ignites your passion. Delight in the sounds of

14💔7

5 May 2024, 06:00 UTC≈3,860 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ “Every child is a different kind of flower, and all together, make this world a beautiful garden.” Children are the embodiment of innocence, curiosity, and boundless potential. They possess an innate ability to see the world through fresh eyes, finding beauty in the simplest of things and approaching each day with a sense of adventure. They are the future, holding within them the power to shape tomorrow’s world

30

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @OnTheMend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“THE HEARTBREAK CLUB: On The Mend.” (@OnTheMend), 333 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OnTheMend.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.