Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 89 days, net +1,735. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,431–19,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 18:48
15,851
-25
3 Nov 2026, 20:16
15,876
-51
2 Nov 2026, 18:10
15,927
-59
1 Nov 2026, 15:26
15,986
-50
31 Oct 2026, 18:20
16,036
-29
30 Oct 2026, 19:57
16,065
-46
29 Oct 2026, 17:58
16,111
-56
28 Oct 2026, 18:19
16,167
-79
27 Oct 2026, 17:31
16,246
-48
26 Oct 2026, 17:00
16,294
-55
25 Oct 2026, 19:38
16,349
-36
24 Oct 2026, 19:39
16,385
-60
23 Oct 2026, 22:17
16,445
-52
22 Oct 2026, 18:49
16,497
-96
21 Oct 2026, 13:41
16,593
-82
20 Oct 2026, 12:41
16,675
-23
19 Oct 2026, 14:20
16,698
-45
18 Oct 2026, 14:38
16,743
-40
17 Oct 2026, 15:06
16,783
-34
16 Oct 2026, 17:31
16,817
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.1%
avg views ÷ 15,851 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,510
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
47 (27 June 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
6,510
Reactions total
595
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
24,636 reactions across 47 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,975
40.5%
👍
7,514
30.5%
🔥
2,647
10.7%
💩
1,559
6.33%
🤣
622
2.52%
🖕
449
1.82%
👎
407
1.65%
👏
402
1.63%
😁
279
1.13%
🥰
189
0.767%
🤡
160
0.649%
⚡
47
0.191%
👌
46
0.187%
🤮
42
0.17%
😢
31
0.126%
🥴
25
0.101%
❤🔥
22
0.089%
🙏
22
0.089%
🤔
22
0.089%
🍌
21
0.085%
18 further kinds
155
0.629%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,636 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
If you no longer believe in Orbition, you are free to leave the group. No one is being forced to stay or participate. We only ask those who remain to judge the project based on facts rather than FUD.
A CEX listing involves significant costs beyond the listing itself, including liquidity, market-making infrastructure, and other operational requirements.
Orbition has already committed more than $2 million in liquidit…
OBN BYBIT LISTING UPDATE
The OBN listing on Bybit has been postponed until October 6 due to unresolved differences regarding the market maker account.
Our team is currently working to finalize the remaining details, and the listing will take place no later than October 6.
Thank you for your patience and continued support.
Stay tuned for further announcements.
OBN CEX LISTING
The CEX will officially announce the OBN listing on September 30.
Deposit and trading details will also be shared to help users prepare for the listing. The Orbition team will also provide liquidity on DEX, although the initial liquidity will be lower than on CEX.
We also noticed that Ethereum network gas fees increased significantly over the past day, making it more difficult for some users to com…
ORBITION AI MINING CLAIM IS NOW LIVE
Connect your wallet to check your eligibility and claim your available OBN allocation.
Access the official Claim page here:
https://claim.orbition.network
For your security, only use the official Orbition Claim link above.
AI MINING UPDATE
I'm Nathan Lin, CTO of Orbition Network.
https://airdrop.orbition.network is back online and fully accessible.
Our development team has been working hard to resolve the recent domain issue and restore access to the AI Mining platform.
I’m extremely disappointed that some individuals deliberately tried to disrupt our project. But I want to make one thing very clear: cheaters, abusive farmers, and …
This was an unexpected issue, and our development team is already working to resolve it.
It does not affect your OBN allocation in any way. The final snapshot was completed as announced, and all snapshot data remains secure.
The AI Mining Eligibility Checker and OBN listing will still proceed according to plan.
We’ll provide an update as soon as normal website access is restored.
Please remember that we believe these are malicious reports targeting our domain from a group of disgruntled farmers and cheaters.
Also ask yourselves this: why was only airdrop.orbition.network reported, while sale.orbition.network was not affected?
You can draw your own conclusions.
OFFICIAL SECURITY UPDATE
Our domain, airdrop.orbition.network, is currently being targeted by malicious reports from a group of cheaters and abusive farmers whose illegitimately earned OBN was removed during our recent review.
As a result, our AI Mining website is currently displaying a suspected phishing warning.
Our development team is actively working to resolve this issue and restore normal access to the websi…
AI MINING UPDATE
The final AI Mining snapshot has been completed.
Our development team is now reviewing the snapshot data to identify and filter out bot activity, cheating, and other abusive behavior. We are conducting this review thoroughly to ensure that only legitimately earned OBN is included in the final distribution.
Please note that the OBN balance currently displayed on the AI Mining page does not represen…
🔥242❤144👍50👏36💩16🐳14🤔6👎5
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @OrbitionNetworkChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Orbition Network – Announcements” (@OrbitionNetworkChannel), 15,851 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrbitionNetworkChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.