Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Orthodox Truth – الحق الأرثوذكسي

Channel

Orthodox Truth – الحق الأرثوذكسي

@OrthodoxTruthEgypt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

883subscribers

+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003485861690
TypeChannel
Username@OrthodoxTruthEgypt
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OrthodoxTruthEgypt

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

842883862.57 August 2026 — 842 subscribers8 August 2026 — 843 subscribers14 August 2026 — 851 subscribers22 August 2026 — 859 subscribers30 August 2026 — 863 subscribers7 September 2026 — 870 subscribers7 September 2026 — 870 subscribers14 September 2026 — 883 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 836–889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 22:19883+13
7 Sept 2026, 06:22870no change
7 Sept 2026, 04:41870+7
30 Aug 2026, 07:28863+4
22 Aug 2026, 10:46859+8
14 Aug 2026, 21:43851+8
8 Aug 2026, 06:11843+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:46842first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 4 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.3%
avg views ÷ 883 subscribers
Avg views / post
224
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.961%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held13 (4 September 20266 September 2026)
Views total2,683
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1047.6%
💯314.3%
🤣314.3%
29.52%
👏29.52%
💘14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC67 views7 reactionsread 7 September 2026

طيب عزيزي المسلم انت ليه زعلان كده ليه ما تخلو الجامع الأزهر يقوم بنفس العمل ويتبنى 75 ألف طفل أو أكثر ويحميهم من الشوارع ويوفر لهم الأكل والشرب والحياة الكريمة ولو الأزهر ما عندوش ميزانية يعمل بيها كده فهو بياخد مليارات الجنيهات كل سنة من فلوس المصريين لكن الكنيسة القبطية بتساعد الأطفال بدون مقابل الأطفال اللي كانوا في الشوارع وفي الأماكن والطرق المقطوعة وبتوفر لهم حياة كريمة وخدتهم وحطتهم في مكان كويس يقدروا يعيشوا

👍3💯31

6 Sept 2026, 08:28 UTC120 viewsread 7 September 2026

هذا معناه أن الكتب الموجودة حاليا والمنسوبة إلى ديونيسيوس الأريوباغي مثل كتاب اللاهوت الصوفي أو اللاهوت الباطني وكتاب الأسماء الإلهية وكتاب المراتب السماوية وكتاب المراتب الكنسية بالإضافة إلى الرسائل العشر ليست في الحقيقة من تأليف ديونيسيوس الأريوباغي المذكور في سفر أعمال الرسل بل هي مجموعة كتابات متأخرة تعرف في الدراسات الحديثة باسم كتابات ديونيسيوس المنحول أو Pseudo-Dionysius والدراسات التاريخية الحديثة ترجع تأليف

6 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 7 September 2026

إلى إخوتي الأحباء في المسيح أحب أن أوضح تصحيحا مهما بخصوص المرجع الذي قمت بنشره سابقًا عن ديونيسيوس الأريوباغي بعد مراجعة الأمر بشكل أدق اكتشفت أنني أخطأت عندما اعتمدت هذا المرجع دون أن أنتبه إلى أن الرسائل المنسوبة إلى ديونيسيوس الأريوباغي هي أيضا جزء من مجموعة الكتابات المعروفة تاريخيا باسم كتابات ديونيسيوس المنحول Pseudo-Dionysius وليست فقط بعض الكتب الأخرى مثل اللاهوت الصوفي والأسماء الإلهية وأنا لم أكن أعلم هذه

👏2👍1

6 Sept 2026, 04:28 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

بمناسبة موضوع الرشم بعد المعمودية في المسيحية هبعتلكم النهاردة كيفية رشم الكبار هل في الجبهه فقط ام في غير ذلك دا امر محمد لاتباعه انهم يدهنوا بالزيت عرق النسا اللي بيطلع بين الفخاد فلما حد يعترض ادهنوله الزيت حسب الوصية الرسوليه دي بين فخاده😀(الرشم في الاسلام)

👍1

5 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

شرح كَون أن الآب و الابن (اثنان) كيف ؟ = هو يقابل أن الشمس و شعاعها (اثنان) لكن المصدر واحد أي أن الله واحد لأن الآب واحد . ____ هذا لا يناقض مثال ق.اغريغوريوس النزينزي ( بل هو يشبه أنك تعاين شيء من اليمين لليسار و آخر يعاين نفس الشيء من اليسار لليمين ) : لأنه قال قبلها : إن الألوهة غير منقسمة في من هم متمايزون كمثل ثلاث شموس المتداخلة المزيج نورها واحد (هو لم يقل ثلاث شموس فقط ، بل كما سبق ) فهو يطابق الشرح ال

1👍1💘1

5 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC205 views1 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

كذبتان إضافيتان تم ترويجهما مؤخرا عن طريق المتربحين بمهاجمة عقيدة الثالوث : الكذبة رقم ١: أن تشبيه الثالوث بالشمس هو تشبيه خاطئ يعتبر نتاج بدعة سابليوس! الكذبة رقم ٢: أن البابا شنودة هو من روج هذا الشرح في القرن ال٢٠! طبعا الكذبتان مفضوحتان لأن طريقة التشبيه المحدودة هذه موجودة تاريخيا من القرن الثاني الميلادي في كافة أرجاء العالم وليس فقط الكنيسة القبطية. ما سقط فيه سابليوس هو سوء شرح التشبيه بما يتوافق مع هرطقته وه

👍1

5 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC187 views1 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

تعليم القديس ساويرس ابن المقفع في القرن العاشر عن تعريف "الأقانيم" وأنهم ليسوا مجرد صفات عارضة، وهو تعليم يناقض به بدعة سابيليوس. _________________ -دلسوا و قالوا: "البابا شنودة علم بأن الأقانيم صفات وان تعليمه سابيلي!" رغم أنهم في تخبطهم دلسوا قبلها بقولهم: "البابا شنودة يقول كل أقنوم إله ورب" -رددنا وقلنا: "أنتم لا تدركون أن التعليمين لا يتعارضان. فالبابا شنودة أكد شخصانية الأقانيم دون فصلهم عن بعض وأكد ان الأقاني

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @OrthodoxTruthEgypt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Orthodox Truth – الحق الأرثوذكسي” (@OrthodoxTruthEgypt), 883 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrthodoxTruthEgypt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.