Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أشعار أسامة النهاري

Channel

أشعار أسامة النهاري

@Osamah_Alnahari

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,603subscribers

+56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398684208
TypeChannel
Username@Osamah_Alnahari
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Osamah_Alnahari

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5372,6032,5706 August 2026 — 2,547 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,547 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,543 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,545 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,542 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,543 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,537 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,543 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,549 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,555 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,587 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,580 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,578 subscribers25 September 2026 — 2,603 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 51 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,527–2,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 21:192,603+25
15 Sept 2026, 05:592,578-2
11 Sept 2026, 10:012,580-7
6 Sept 2026, 21:582,587+32
2 Sept 2026, 13:422,555+6
30 Aug 2026, 10:152,549+6
27 Aug 2026, 07:052,543+6
24 Aug 2026, 06:472,537-6
20 Aug 2026, 04:432,543+1
16 Aug 2026, 19:142,542-3
12 Aug 2026, 22:142,545+2
10 Aug 2026, 08:512,543-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:052,547no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:162,547first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

643 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤35154.6%
😁15323.8%
🔥7010.9%
😢355.44%
👏203.11%
👍71.09%
🤩60.933%
❤‍🔥10.156%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC402 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

لو تسوقت في إحدى المكاتب ولقيت ديوان أسامة النهاري صدفة، هل ستشتريه؟

  1. نعم36%
  2. لا24%
  3. ما معي فلوس51%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤15😁11🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC520 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

لقد كنتُ أرجو أن أكون لديهمُ أميرًا وشعري في البلاد يَسيرُ ولكنه قد عيَّ دون سفاههم لساني عياءَ الحُرِّ وهو قديرُ ألم تر حُكمَ العار أصبح حُكمَهم فمن يكشفِ العوراتِ فهْو أميرُ سوايَ بهاتيك الأباطيلِ مولعٌ وغيري بتلك الترهاتِ جديرُ فما ليَ حُوتٌ ينطح الناسَ قَرنُهُ وماليَ قِطٌّ في السماء يَطيرُ ولكنني مولى القريض ومَلْكُهُ وإن لم يكن لي منبرٌ وسريرُ فلو قلته في سالف الدهر مرةً لسارت به الركبانُ حيث تسيرُ وقرَّض…

😁34❤12👏9🔥1🤩1

2 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC891 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أنا ابنُ عليٍّ كرم اللهُ وجهَهُ ولا كرم اللهُ وجوهَ الروافضِ يقولون أحببنا النبيَّ وآلَهُ وحُبُّهمُ كالماء في كفِّ قابضِ أحبوا عليًّا -يزعمون- ولم يكن أشدَّ أذًى منهم له كلُّ باغضِ فإنْ يلعنوا ذا النصبِ لا يلعنوا سوى نفوسِهمُ يا داحضَ النصبِ داحِضِ

❤44🔥5

1 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC916 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لله درها تُقِلُّ عابرا صعبَ العبورِ وتُقِيلُ عاثرا كوريّةٌ ترى لها حوافرا مسودةً تُشابه الدياجرا إن سُمتُها القِفار والعراعرا لم تخشَ إلا اللهَ والسواهرا

❤14😁4🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC≈1,080 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

يشيخُ ابنُ عبدالعظيم وما له مثل باقي الشيوخِ وقارُ له لحيةٌ يقطر اللؤمُ منها حُسومًا ووجهٌ عليه الغبارُ كأنّ ابنَ عبدالعظيم وقد دنا منخراه من الأرض فارُ فمن يَرَهُ لا يكُنْ ذا ارتيابٍ بأنّ لئامَ الرجال القِصارُ أيشتم صحبَ النبي فلا يزلْ لابنِ عبدالعظيمِ الخسارُ

❤18👏2

29 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC≈1,140 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سأسمو للتي لا عيبَ فيها وعرضي دونها أبدًا مصونُ وإن أبذُلْ سوى ماء المحيا فمثلي لا يُهان ولا يهونُ

❤21🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,320 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

إذا لانت الحسناءُ نالت مرادَها وإن لم تَلِنْ ماذا عساها تُمارسُ؟ ويسهلُ ليُّ العُود رطبًا وثنيُهُ ويسهل كسرُ العود والعودُ يابسُ

❤20😁6

27 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,250 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

إليك أبا كمالٍ سُقتُ عُذري ومن عجب بريءٌ ذو اعتذارِ ولكني وجدتُ أسًى بصدري يضيقُ عليه فضفاضُ الصِّدارِ لنعم المرء أنت لدى المعالي محلًّى بالديانةِ والوقارِ ولم يصحبك في حالَيك عارٌ ولم يذممك غيرُ خدين عارِ ولم أبرح إلى الرحمن أدعو ليشملنا جميعًا باغتفارِ

❤12

21 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,710 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أبا جعفرَ استحللتَ عِرضَ أئمةٍ يَرى عُلماءُ المسلمين لهم فضلا أكنتَ ترى تلك العقولَ عوازبًا ومن يرَ نجمَ الأُفق ضلَّ فقد ضلا أَعِد نظرةً فيما أتيتَ وقلْ لنا أكفَّر مَن كفرتَهُ عالمٌ قبلا؟ وهل جبُنوا عن نُصرةِ الحقِّ كُلُّهم وكنتَ وحيدًا لا جبانًا ولا وغلا ؟! وحاشاهمُ بل كنتَ أجرأَ منهمُ على الجهلِ فاستسهلتَ ما لم يكن سهلا أبا جعفرٍ أنصِتْ إلى ناصحٍ وكنْ أخا طمعٍ واستوهِبِ الواهبَ العقلا

❤37👏6😁5🤩2🔥1😢1

20 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC≈1,550 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لقد أذاقتنيَ الدنيا مرارتَها فلستُ من بعدها أَعبَا بحالِيها فلو أتاني الحِمامُ اليومَ قبلَ غدٍ لما أَسِفتُ على الدنيا وما فيها إلا على سجدةٍ في خلوةٍ خشعت بها الجوارحُ للرحمن بارِيها أو ساعةٍ بتُّ أتلو وهي مُظلمةٌ آيًا يكونُ نهارًا ليلُ تالِيها

❤28😢3

19 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,480 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

إن ابنَ تيميةٍ لشمسٌ لم تدع طرفًا يراها وهو غيرُ حسيرِ رامت رذيلةُ فضلَهُ واستبدلت أختُ الخبائثِ مِنبرًا بسريرِ فَجَرَت بما قالت وكانت قبله بقبيحِ ذاك الوجه ذاتَ فُجورِ فإذا رأته مقلةٌ رَمِدت به وتعوذت من منكرٍ ونكيرِ

❤20🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC≈1,660 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هل كان زيدانُ إلا فارسًا بطلًا لو أنه من أُسودِ الغِيلِ مذعورُ يُعَدُّ زيدانُ من بين الرجال وقد أقضَّ مضجعَ زيدانَ الصراصيرُ

😁9🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Osamah_Alnahari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTCAnonymous Poll237 voters

لو تسوقت في إحدى المكاتب ولقيت ديوان أسامة النهاري صدفة، هل ستشتريه؟

  1. نعم36%
  2. لا24%
  3. ما معي فلوس51%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أشعار أسامة النهاري” (@Osamah_Alnahari), 2,603 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Osamah_Alnahari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.