Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖔𝖘𝖐𝖔𝖑𝖔𝖐 𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖎

Channel

𝖔𝖘𝖐𝖔𝖑𝖔𝖐 𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖎

@OskolokElli4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

177subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003995382504
TypeChannel
Username@OskolokElli4
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OskolokElli4

Growth

162177169.513 Sept 2026, 00:47 — 162 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 01:22 — 162 subscribers14 Sept 2026, 05:01 — 177 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 00:4714 Sept 2026, 05:01
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 160–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 05:01177+15
13 Sept 2026, 01:22162no change
13 Sept 2026, 00:47162first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.18%
avg views ÷ 177 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.2
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
43.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held17 (12 September 202612 September 2026)
Views total156
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥823.5%
💘823.5%
💋514.7%
🍓411.8%
👀38.82%
🆒25.88%
12.94%
👻12.94%
💯12.94%
🥰12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2026, 15:51 UTC10 viewsread 13 September 2026

Ставьте реакции пожалуйста😭

Signed РЕСТ/ 𝒴𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝓁𝒾𝓉𝓉𝓁𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓁 #фанатка_Марка #фанатка_Энни #дочь_Лары

12 Sept 2026, 15:46 UTC11 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 🌟💙🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 И лучшее позади‑и‑и‑и 💙(Этот свет в конце туннеля — просто зеркало) И лучшее позади‑и‑и‑и 💙💙(Тянем‑потянем, 💙💙💙да за уши) И лучшее позади‑и‑и‑и (Никого не слушай) И лучшее позади‑и‑и‑и 💙(Этот свет в конце 💙💙туннеля просто…) 💙🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍 mzlff 🤍🤍💙💙💙 —— 🤍🤍 лучшее позади 🌸🔤еги🌸 #темноерождество #фон Автор: little angel @PodvalStalkersha ФОНЫ БРАТЬ ТОЛЬКО С

💘2❤‍🔥1

Signed РЕСТ/ 𝒴𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝓁𝒾𝓉𝓉𝓁𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓁 #фанатка_Марка #фанатка_Энни #дочь_Лары

12 Sept 2026, 13:14 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1

Signed РЕСТ/ 𝒴𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝓁𝒾𝓉𝓉𝓁𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓁 #фанатка_Марка #фанатка_Энни #дочь_Лары

12 Sept 2026, 13:13 UTC6 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐ 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 💙🖤💙🔦🔦🔦🔦💙🖤💙 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🔤еги: #фоны #темноерождество 🔤втор: little angel @PodvalStalkersha ФОНЫ БРАТЬ ТОЛЬКО С ОТМЕТКОЙ КАНАЛА‼️

❤‍🔥1💋1

Signed РЕСТ/ 𝒴𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝓁𝒾𝓉𝓉𝓁𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓁 #фанатка_Марка #фанатка_Энни #дочь_Лары

12 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC5 viewsread 13 September 2026

реакции будут? давайте ещё немного

12 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC6 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @PodvalStalkershaPoll

Какой делаем псевд? Канал меняем позже

  1. Девочка беда🙏6%
  2. Детка киллер 😈13%
  3. Пионерка 🙈3%
  4. Продюсерша 🤭19%
  5. Маньячка 💗34%
  6. Rave Doll 🎎6%
  7. Antigirl🦊19%
  8. Интердевочка😈0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026

приятно познакомиться

❤‍🔥2

12 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC11 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

+осколок приветик, я лика, также можете посмотреть о нас в навигации, из администраторов у нас есть: -лэмичка/лэми -лиза/блейсова/лизок -варя/варюша -даша/сталкерша/дашуля как к вам можно обращаться? ★надеемся на долгий союз, и на взаимный актив ★

❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @OskolokElli4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTCFinal Results32 voters

Какой делаем псевд? Канал меняем позже

  1. Девочка беда🙏6%
  2. Детка киллер 😈13%
  3. Пионерка 🙈3%
  4. Продюсерша 🤭19%
  5. Маньячка 💗34%
  6. Rave Doll 🎎6%
  7. Antigirl🦊19%
  8. Интердевочка😈0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 12 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖔𝖘𝖐𝖔𝖑𝖔𝖐 𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖎” (@OskolokElli4), 177 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OskolokElli4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.