27 measurements spanning 34 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,175–15,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 07:57
15,179
-1
6 Sept 2026, 03:02
15,180
-10
3 Sept 2026, 23:58
15,190
+3
2 Sept 2026, 11:54
15,187
-3
31 Aug 2026, 14:14
15,190
+1
30 Aug 2026, 16:12
15,189
-3
29 Aug 2026, 13:54
15,192
-8
28 Aug 2026, 17:12
15,200
-3
27 Aug 2026, 13:58
15,203
+2
26 Aug 2026, 17:07
15,201
-1
25 Aug 2026, 18:38
15,202
+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:56
15,200
+9
23 Aug 2026, 05:03
15,191
+7
21 Aug 2026, 20:08
15,184
-1
20 Aug 2026, 15:37
15,185
-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:22
15,187
+1
18 Aug 2026, 11:08
15,186
-1
17 Aug 2026, 12:54
15,187
-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:14
15,189
+5
14 Aug 2026, 14:25
15,184
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 15,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,610
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
33 (23 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
61,322
Reactions total
4,117
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 12s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,576 reactions across 33 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,546
41.3%
🙏
2,716
31.7%
👍
1,188
13.9%
🔥
484
5.64%
😁
229
2.67%
😢
120
1.40%
💯
117
1.36%
😱
51
0.595%
🥰
21
0.245%
🤔
16
0.187%
😡
15
0.175%
🥴
15
0.175%
🤯
11
0.128%
🎉
10
0.117%
👏
10
0.117%
🆒
9
0.105%
🤝
8
0.093%
😍
4
0.047%
👻
2
0.023%
💔
1
0.012%
3 further kinds
3
0.035%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,576 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
193
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 33 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OtecGeorgy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.03%
1 of 33 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,710
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,260
over 32 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHM2eG1
1
22 August 2026
22 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
ИДЕТ НАБОР в Школу православного миссионера на 2026-2027 учебный год
• Школа имеет отделения очного и дистанционного обучения;
• Занятия в течение двух лет, три дня в неделю, в вечернее время;
• Обучение бесплатно.
КАК ПОСТУПИТЬ:
Регистрируйтесь на сайте orthomission.ru и пройдите три шага в курсе «Поступить в Школу».
Желающие обучаться должны быть православными христианами, знать основы Православной веры в объеме…
Иногда спрашивают, встречали ли мы в Африке "дикие" племена (в смысле живущие традиционным укладом). Обычно нет, но в последнее посещение Танзании мы были у такого племени, они называются хадза или хадзабе. Небольшое видео про то, как они добывают огонь и охотятся. Видео с домом в баобабе, опубликованное мною ранее, снято там же.
Воспитанник православной школы в ЦАР вернулся домой после успешного лечения в Москве
Из московской больницы выписан Василий Бабула, успешно прошедший сложную операцию по восстановлению пищевода.
Василий – лучший ученик православной школы преподобного Сергия Радонежского в Центральноафриканской Республике. Ребенок по ошибке выпил кислоту, перепутав ее с водой, что привело к сильным повреждениям пищевода. При вашей п…
Продолжаю рассказ о том, что было сделано во время визита митрополита Константина в Кению. Одна из серьезных проблем многих африканцев — отсутствие источников чистой питьевой воды. Поэтому Патриарший экзархат Африки регулярно обеспечивает бурение скважин и установку водных колонок в тех местах, где их нет. В этот раз митрополит Константин открыл колонки на приходе святого Зосимы Соловецкого в Чемелиле (благочиние Нан…
Недавно произошло значимое для церковных дел в Африке событие, которое многие не заметили. Высокопоставленные представители раскольнической "Православной Церкви Украины" прибыли с официальным визитом в Кению, где их принял митрополит Найробский Макарий (Тиллиридис) и благословил им совершить литургию в храме Александрийской Православной Церкви в сосоужении кенийского духовенства. Это первый случай, когда африканцев, …
Одна из самых острых проблем православных приходов в Африке - нехватка храмовых зданий. Потихоньку при помощи неравнодушных христиан из России эта проблема решается. Во время своего текущего визита в Кению митрполит Константин, Патриарший Экзарх Африки Русской Православной Церкви, освятил три новопостроенных храма, посетил четыре строящихся и заложил шесть будущих.
Были освящены:
1. храм св. Афанасия Великого в Ньяби…
Как сообщает доктор Браун, из евреев, обратившихся в христианство, больше всего сделали это под впечатлением от прочтения 53-й главы книги пророка Исайи.
Неудивительно, что иудеи выработали много возражений в попытке доказать, что эта глава говорит не об Иисусе Христе. В новом видео мы разбираем все эти возражения.
Ютуб - Рутуб - ВК
Недавно я сообщал, что издательство анонсировало выход сборника "Мир ксеноархеолога" с рассказами разных авторов по миру моей дилогии "Черный ксеноархеолог" и "Белый ксеноархеолог". Ну а теперь еще открылась возможность предзаказа книги на сайте "Читай-город": https://www.chitai-gorod.ru/r/UVADH?erid=2W5zFHM2eG1
На обложке изображены корабли колонистов, покидающие Землю.
Предзаказ помогает не только самим читателям …
О богохульных интернет-группах, каналах и сообществах, созданных для того, чтобы дурачить православных.
Уже не раз подписчики обращались ко мне с просьбой обратить внимание на проблему массового распространения псевдоправославного контента, сгненерированного нейросетью. Появились целые каналы "священников" или "монахов", где выкладываются видео, на которых сгенерированный ИИ образ "благообразного старца" озвучивает …
Вчера с африканскими подарками в благочинии Нанди (Кения). Это одеяние (накидка) называется шука и вчера оно действительно помогало согреться, так как было весьма прохладно - тут сейчас зима плюс приходы были в горах.
❤196🙏69👍58🔥19😁2🥴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @OtecGeorgy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
📜 Цитата из Библии @azbible · 83,246 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Канал о. Саввы Мажуко @savvamazhuko · 29,608 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Священник Альвиан @alwian · 28,900 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Азбука веры @azbyka · 50,463 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
БИБЛИЯ ОТВЕЧАЕТ - Экзегет @ekzeget · 50,490 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Священник Владислав Береговой @pravoslavieVtelege · 98,760 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Владимир Легойда @vladimirlegoyda · 33,957 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 September 2026
Cogito ergo sum (канал архиепископа Саввы) @kartezianec · 34,511 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
Валаамский монастырь @valaam · 34,882 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
Журнал «Фома» @foma_ru_glavnoe · 80,502 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Алексей Ильич Осипов @professor_osipov · 40,633 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Азбука молитвы @azprayer · 69,248 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
СПЖ - новости Православия @pravoslavie · 27,830 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Максимов, Георгий Валерьевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…|date=20221124010904 }} // [[romfea.gr]], 12.02.2022[https://t.me/OtecGeorgy/506 Ответ Патриарху Александрийскому Феодору] // Канал иерея Георгия…” read 23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иерей Георгий Максимов” (@OtecGeorgy), 15,179 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OtecGeorgy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.