Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OttolinaTV

Channel

OttolinaTV

@Ottolina_TV

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,434subscribers

+120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001837259777
TypeChannel
Username@Ottolina_TV
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ottolina_TV

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,31410,43410,3746 August 2026 — 10,314 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,314 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,318 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,319 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,322 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,327 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,328 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,337 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,350 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,361 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,362 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,361 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,365 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,369 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,373 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,383 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,388 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,387 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,386 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,389 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,390 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,397 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,394 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,398 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,404 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,410 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,418 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,416 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,411 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,416 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,417 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,420 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,434 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,296–10,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:3610,434+14
15 Sept 2026, 20:2110,420+3
14 Sept 2026, 03:1510,417+1
12 Sept 2026, 09:3810,416+5
10 Sept 2026, 05:1610,411-5
6 Sept 2026, 19:5810,416-2
4 Sept 2026, 09:1710,418+8
3 Sept 2026, 00:5710,410+6
1 Sept 2026, 20:3410,404+6
31 Aug 2026, 18:2410,398+4
30 Aug 2026, 17:3310,394-3
29 Aug 2026, 18:1410,397+7
28 Aug 2026, 16:0310,390+1
27 Aug 2026, 14:5410,389+3
26 Aug 2026, 14:3410,386-1
25 Aug 2026, 17:2810,387-1
24 Aug 2026, 16:1610,388+5
23 Aug 2026, 02:0510,383+10
21 Aug 2026, 12:0410,373+4
20 Aug 2026, 12:2610,369first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 10,434 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,160
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held75 (26 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total36,710
Reactions total940
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46m 14s
Average length
2m 19s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,142 reactions across 69 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,93746.8%
83020.0%
🤣2636.35%
🤮2616.30%
👏2075.00%
💩1643.96%
🤬1563.77%
🔥741.79%
🤡491.18%
😁421.01%
🤔410.99%
😢170.41%
😡150.362%
😭110.266%
🖕100.241%
😨90.217%
👎70.169%
👀60.145%
💯60.145%
👌50.121%
14 further kinds320.773%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
52
across the posts below
Posts paid on
43
of 74 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ottolina_TV. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,470 views56 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Gli Stati Uniti vogliono trasformare il loro vantaggio nell’intelligenza artificiale in un dominio globale: chip, data center, cloud, modelli e standard americani. E l’Italia, puntuale, si accoda. Il 31 luglio abbiamo aderito a Pax Silica, presentata come un innocuo accordo per rendere più sicure le filiere tecnologiche. Due settimane dopo, però, Reuters rivela cosa Washington vuole davvero chiedere ai Paesi aderen

👍37💩11😢43🤣1

28 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,540 views33 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 Nel 2008 bastò una montagna di mutui tossici da meno di 1.000 miliardi di dollari per scatenare la più devastante crisi finanziaria degli ultimi decenni… ▶️ video completo qui: https://youtu.be/Gvvn1x79wbY?is=cOUt69lkLjwf6TKW 👉E' USCITO IL NUOVO PAMPHLET DEL MARRU, "DISERTARE L'ASSEDIO". Corri a comprare la tua copia qui: https://poetsandsailors.com/shop/disertare-l-assedio/#OttolinaTV 👉 Aderisci alla campagna

👍283🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,530 views36 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Torniamo sulla questione Ratcliffe, perché nelle ultime ore sono emersi dettagli che rendono il viaggio segreto del direttore della CIA a Mosca ancora più interessante. Secondo Washington Post e New York Times, negli Stati Uniti sarebbe cresciuto il timore che la Russia, vedendo Washington indebolita e assorbita dalla guerra contro l’Iran, potesse considerare questo il momento giusto per alzare il livello dello scon

👍266🤔2👻1🤮1

27 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,890 views58 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Nel 2008 bastò una montagna di mutui tossici da meno di 1.000 miliardi di dollari per innescare la più devastante crisi finanziaria degli ultimi decenni. Oggi, per costruire l’infrastruttura dell’intelligenza artificiale, McKinsey stima servano circa 6.700 miliardi di dollari entro il 2030. E Wall Street si sta già attrezzando. Nvidia ha chiamato BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs e KKR per m

💩2515👍12🤮3🤬2😱1

27 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,800 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🇸🇦 Riad ha deciso di umiliare Trump? 🇮🇷 Dopo sei mesi di guerra contro l’Iran, Washington deve fare i conti con un Medio Oriente molto meno obbediente del previsto… 🎙️ Ne parliamo con Marco Carnelos, ex ambasciatore italiano in Iraq e inviato speciale per il Medio Oriente. 📺 video completo qui: https://youtu.be/Y9vre4Xa_Cc?is=p0q-DAzUj4OACNhv 👉E' USCITO IL NUOVO PAMPHLET DEL MARRU, "DISERTARE L'ASSEDIO". Corri a

👍33👏32😁1

27 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈3,760 views35 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ieri una notizia sottovalutata: il capo della CIA John Ratcliffe è volato a Mosca. E ci è arrivato in modo tutt’altro che discreto: un C-17A Globemaster III dell’US Air Force. Ratcliffe ha incontrato il capo dell’intelligence estera russa Sergei Naryshkin. Ma cosa ci è andato a fare? Una spiegazione possibile è che Washington stia cercando una de-escalation regolata con Mosca: ridurre gli attacchi ucraini in profon

👍293🤔2🕊1

27 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC≈2,070 views97 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ottoliner, buongiornissimoh 🥰

🤣90😁52

26 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈2,020 views58 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

Riad ha deciso di UMILIARE Trump? Dopo sei mesi di guerra contro l’Iran, gli Stati Uniti sembrano costretti a fare i conti con un Medio Oriente molto meno obbediente del previsto. L’Arabia Saudita riapre il dialogo con Teheran, Washington prova a riportarla dentro il recinto offrendo la cooperazione sul nucleare civile, ma Trump aggiunge una condizione pesantissima: niente accordo senza adesione agli Accordi di Abr

👍4511🔥1🤔1

26 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,970 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🚆 La chiamano Rail Baltica: doveva essere il gioiello ferroviario dei Baltici, collegando Tallinn, Riga e Vilnius alla rete europea ad alta velocità… 📺 video completo qui: https://youtu.be/ZPykSVQylY8?is=Y4DLh-fh8t7JzPJw 👉E' USCITO IL NUOVO PAMPHLET DEL MARRU, "DISERTARE L'ASSEDIO". Corri a comprare la tua copia qui: https://poetsandsailors.com/shop/disertare-l-assedio/#OttolinaTV 👉 Aderisci alla campagna di sott

👍29👏6🔥53

26 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,960 views37 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Un viaggio inatteso, un enorme C-17 americano che atterra a Mosca e il capo della CIA che scompare per ore dentro una rete di colloqui riservati. Dietro la missione di John Ratcliffe si intrecciano almeno quattro dossier: guerra in Ucraina, rischio di escalation con la NATO, rapporto tra Russia e Iran e possibile scambio di prigionieri. Nella live proviamo a capire cosa sappiamo davvero, quali ipotesi stanno circol

👍297🥴1

25 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,460 views70 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

La chiamano Rail Baltica. Doveva essere il gioiello ferroviario dei Baltici: Tallinn, Riga e Vilnius finalmente collegate alla rete europea ad alta velocità. Costo previsto nel 2017: 5,8 miliardi di euro. Oggi siamo arrivati a 23,8 miliardi. Quasi quattro volte tanto. Per capirci: da trent’anni in Italia ci massacriamo sulla Torino-Lione anche per l’esplosione dei costi. Secondo la Corte dei conti europea, la TA

🤬35👏1512💩5👍1😁1😱1

25 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,100 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 Per decenni ci hanno raccontato che i Treasury americani erano il bene rifugio per eccellenza, il pilastro “sicuro” della finanza globale. Oggi Donald Trump arriva perfino a evocare l’esercito parlando dei rendimenti del debito USA… 👉 video completo qui: https://youtu.be/REB3Mbv_NWA?is=oZyRjrlDOn24k7R2 👉E' USCITO IL NUOVO PAMPHLET DEL MARRU, "DISERTARE L'ASSEDIO". Corri a comprare la tua copia qui: https://poets

👏33🖕42

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @Ottolina_TV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

O.d.E.G. Guerra NATO-RUSSIA
@OrdEvG · 26,668
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
l'AntiDiplomatico
@lantidiplomatico · 88,698
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
POLIVOX di Clara Statello
@clarastatello · 28,465
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
InfoDefenseITALIA
@infodefITALY · 47,832
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Giulietto Chiesa Real
@giuliettochiesareal · 26,807
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 September 2026
Scenari Economici Channel
@economiciscenari · 29,755
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Tutti i fatti
@tutti_i_fatti · 50,119
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Il Fatto Quotidiano
@ilfattoquotidianoit · 22,518
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 September 2026
Visione Tv
@visionetv · 40,358
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
NICOLAI LILIN
@nicolaililin · 65,344
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Giubbe Rosse
@rossobruni · 71,987
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Giorgio Bianchi Photojournalist
@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist · 115,558
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026
Luogocomune2
@luogocomune2 · 48,815
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
RangeloniNews
@vn_rangeloni · 48,959
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Donbass italia
@donbassitalia · 38,302
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
Giuseppe Masala Chili 🌶
@giuseppemasala · 22,503
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OttolinaTV” (@Ottolina_TV), 10,434 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ottolina_TV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.