Channel
@OtziviCodesMind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
451subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001382418216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OtziviCodesMind |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OtziviCodesMind |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 451 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 450 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 446 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 447 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 447 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
31 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 58.1% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 25.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Добрый день, спасибо большое за такую информацию Я ещё сама разбираюсь и не все поняла, но меня очень удивила информация, что моя задача проповедь о Боге и того более я ещё и вести должна психологическую деятельность, я мне кажется совсем этим не занимаюсь Вообще я в растерянности, меня всю жизнь вело в продажи, даже когда я этого не хотела. Но мне понравился Ваш труд, спасибо большое и всех Вам благ
🔥1
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Благодарю сердечно за рассчёты. Понятно и доступно! 🙏
❤1❤🔥1🔥1🕊1
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
👍👍👍👍👍
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Благодарю🙏
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Кассиопея - вы лучшие
❤2
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Благодарю вас🙏
❤1
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Благодарю проект Кассиопея за описание кодов осознанности! Это очень интересно, познавательно что очень необходимо каждому человеку. Желаю проекту Кассиопея процветания и всех благ!
❤2
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Благодарю! Очень интересно и познавательно ❤️
❤2
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Интересный расчёт. Пока не понятен для восприятия.
❤1
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Доброго времени суток всем🌞 Огромная благодарность 🫶 за такую обширную информацию , такой нигде не находила, это как,находишь КЛАД,чувствовала,что наступит время и я найду эту информацию. Ещё конечно не всем воспользовалась.., Подскажите, пожалуйста, настрой планеты Эслер это ("Во имя Всемогущего Бога, во имя Энергии Света, во имя Силы Любви, которая творит все миры и планы)? Какой -то информацией пользовалась интуит…
❤5🔥2❤🔥1👍1
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Спасибо, о следила некоторые закономерности моей жизни, да действительно осознала, что проходила именно эти уроки жизни и опыт получала
🔥2
Signed Дмитрий КОДЫ ОСОЗНАННОСТИ
Благодарю,🙏 все очень интересно, буду применять❤️
❤2
Signed Расчёт личных кодов
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OtziviCodesMind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОТЗЫВЫ. КОДЫ ОСОЗНАННОСТИ” (@OtziviCodesMind), 451 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OtziviCodesMind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.