Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
21 measurements spanning 86 days, net +128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,167–3,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Nov 2026, 13:06
3,315
-1
29 Oct 2026, 15:40
3,316
+3
26 Oct 2026, 19:20
3,313
+2
23 Oct 2026, 14:44
3,311
+3
20 Oct 2026, 22:58
3,308
+7
17 Oct 2026, 20:27
3,301
+1
14 Oct 2026, 23:26
3,300
+13
11 Oct 2026, 11:55
3,287
+11
5 Oct 2026, 13:39
3,276
+16
27 Sept 2026, 10:19
3,260
+29
18 Sept 2026, 02:59
3,231
+5
13 Sept 2026, 14:01
3,226
+4
9 Sept 2026, 19:15
3,222
+12
4 Sept 2026, 17:58
3,210
+2
1 Sept 2026, 00:45
3,208
+8
28 Aug 2026, 19:23
3,200
+5
25 Aug 2026, 10:32
3,195
+6
22 Aug 2026, 11:57
3,189
-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:03
3,190
+4
7 Aug 2026, 18:07
3,186
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
16
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A 34-year-old man presents to the clinic with a 6-month history of progressive exertional dyspnea and a mild, non-productive cough. He has no past medical history and has never smoked cigarettes. His father died of liver cirrhosis at age 42. Physical examination reveals decreased breath sounds bilaterally at the lung bases. High resolution CT of the chest demonstrates panacinar emphysema predominantly involving the l…
A 64-year-old man presents to the emergency department with severe, tearing chest pain that radiates to his back. His blood pressure is 175/95 mmHg in the right arm and 140/80 mmHg in the left arm. A CT angiogram reveals a dissection of the descending thoracic aorta, originating distal to the left subclavian artery. The patient is immediately started on an intravenous infusion of nitroprusside.
Shortly after the ini…
A 23-year-old G1P0 woman at 34 weeks gestation presents to the emergency department complaining of a sudden onset of severe, constant abdominal pain and dark vaginal bleeding. She notes that the fetal movements have decreased over the past few hours. Her prenatal course was complicated by chronic hypertension, for which she has been non-compliant with medications.
On physical examination, her blood pressure is 165/1…
A 64-year-old male presents to the emergency department with a 4-hour history of severe, tearing chest pain that radiates to his back. His medical history is significant for long-standing, poorly controlled hypertension. On physical examination, his blood pressure is 185/110 mm Hg in the right arm and 160/95 mm Hg in the left arm. A murmur of aortic insufficiency is heard at the right sternal border.
While awaiting …
A 28-year-old woman presents with primary infertility for 2 years. She reports regular menstrual cycles every 28 days. Her partner has a normal semen analysis. She has no history of pelvic infections or surgeries.
On evaluation:
Basal body temperature shows a biphasic pattern
Serum progesterone is elevated in the luteal phase
Hysterosalpingography shows bilateral patent fallopian tubes
Endometrial biopsy performed on…
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
كل عام وانتم بخير، عيد أضحى مبارك تقبل الله منا ومنكم صالح الأعمال
في بنك أسئلة اسمه ميد بارك عامل خصومات بمناسبة العيد
https://t.me/medpark1
ده لينك القناة تبعهم تقدروا تتواصلوا معاهم وتشوفوا الخصومات وفي فري ترايل لمدة ٧ ايام ممكن تستخدموها وتحكموا بنفسكم
انا نزلتها بس من باب المنفعة العامة.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
اهنا كده الحمد لله خلصنا ال Reproductive ومعانا اجازة لحد يوم السبت
اللي لسه مبدأش عادي يبدأ من السيستم الجديد
It's never too late
ان شاء الله ده اخر Wave مش هنعمل غيرها فحاولوا تستغلوها على قد ما تقدروا وبالتوفيق دايما
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Overhaul_Wave1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Q2: The cells responsible for this patients presentation are embryologically derived from the pancreatic buds. Under normal physiological conditions, where are these specific endocrine cells predominantly concentrated within a healthy islet of Langerhans?
A) Scattered throughout the exocrine acinar tissue17%
B) Uniformly distributed along the islet capillary basement membrane21%
C) Aggregated within the central core of the islet14%
D) Restricted to the outer periphery of the islet41%
E) Exclusively located within the epithelial lining of the pancreatic ducts7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
USMLE pathway ( FA Explanations + sources + Experiences ) @passusmle111 · 22,264 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Overhaul Wave 1” (@Overhaul_Wave1), 3,315 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Overhaul_Wave1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
