Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OXIDE NEWS

Channel

OXIDE NEWS

@Oxide_Newsss

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

20,505subscribers

+12,526 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002697961161
TypeChannel
Username@Oxide_Newsss
CreatedBetween 1 April 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Oxide_Newsss

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,97920,50514,2427 August 2026 — 7,979 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,084 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,289 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,603 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,083 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,556 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,305 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,784 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,474 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,638 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,845 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,956 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,987 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,154 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,187 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,242 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,776 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,125 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,511 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,698 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,894 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,073 subscribers30 September 2026 — 16,292 subscribers6 October 2026 — 16,775 subscribers10 October 2026 — 16,865 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,209 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,182 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,222 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,435 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,597 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,690 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,733 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,823 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,168 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,244 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,487 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,611 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,699 subscribers27 October 2026 — 19,042 subscribers28 October 2026 — 19,508 subscribers29 October 2026 — 19,633 subscribers30 October 2026 — 19,676 subscribers31 October 2026 — 19,779 subscribers1 November 2026 — 20,348 subscribers2 November 2026 — 20,399 subscribers3 November 2026 — 20,475 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,505 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
49 measurements spanning 89 days, net +12,526. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,100–22,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 19:4720,505+30
3 Nov 2026, 18:5720,475+76
2 Nov 2026, 20:5620,399+51
1 Nov 2026, 18:2020,348+569
31 Oct 2026, 21:3619,779+103
30 Oct 2026, 21:4819,676+43
29 Oct 2026, 18:5619,633+125
28 Oct 2026, 16:4619,508+466
27 Oct 2026, 13:2619,042+343
26 Oct 2026, 14:0918,699+88
25 Oct 2026, 11:4618,611+124
24 Oct 2026, 13:2018,487+243
23 Oct 2026, 13:2818,244+76
22 Oct 2026, 09:5918,168+345
21 Oct 2026, 02:1917,823+90
20 Oct 2026, 02:5617,733+43
19 Oct 2026, 01:5917,690+93
18 Oct 2026, 01:0917,597+162
16 Oct 2026, 23:0617,435+213
16 Oct 2026, 02:2717,222first reading

Engagement

108 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.9%
avg views ÷ 20,505 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,410
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.401%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 108 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held108 (30 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total178,790
Reactions total717
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
462
Videos
151
Links
115

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 15s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,616 reactions across 108 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,81423.8%
👎97212.8%
🔥93612.3%
🤮6708.80%
🥰5867.69%
👍4686.14%
👏4155.45%
🤬3885.09%
🤡1501.97%
😭1371.80%
🥴1281.68%
❤‍🔥1031.35%
🤣921.21%
💩881.16%
🫡690.906%
🖕610.801%
🍌490.643%
🗿430.565%
👾410.538%
😍400.525%
37 further kinds3664.81%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
82
across the posts below
Posts paid on
33
of 108 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Oxide_Newsss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (78.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC≈4,940 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Слив мифического скина на калаш он будет в рулетке которую скоро добавят в игру его можно будет улучшать как сейчас скин на пулик ⌛ Скачать бету – Oxide_betabot

🔥26❤6🤬3🥰3

2 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC≈5,030 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Слив новых скинов которые скоро добавят в игру ⌛ Скачать бету – Oxide_betabot

👍10❤4👏2🥰2

1 Nov 2026, 19:24 UTC≈6,600 views101 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Слив всех скинов из нового БП ⌛ Скачать бету – Oxide_betabot

🥰58👎23🔥8❤5👏4👍3

1 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC≈7,340 views54 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ НА БЕТКЕ ВЫШЛА ОБНОВА С ФИКСОМ БАГОВ СКАЧАТЬ МОЖНО В БОТЕ ПО ССЫЛКЕ НИЖЕ 👇 👉 https://t.me/Oxide_betabot?start=mwilxyuj

🤬27❤23👍2🥰2

1 Nov 2026, 10:27 UTC≈7,710 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

⚡️ Обзор обновы на бете

❤13🥰4👍3👎3🔥3🤝1😁1

31 Oct 2026, 21:31 UTC≈9,400 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ НА БЕТКЕ ВЫШЛА ОБНОВА СКАЧАТЬ МОЖНО В БОТЕ ПО ССЫЛКЕ НИЖЕ 👇 👉 https://t.me/Oxide_betabot?start=2cuc9ctp

🔥14❤8🥰5👍4😡3👏2

31 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTC≈7,800 views33 reactions3 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔔 Если у вас появилась такая ошибка удалите оксайд и скачайте по ссылке которая находится в закрепе Если не хотите удалять оксайд просто ждите новую бету вы сможете спокойно обновить оксайд по ссылке без его удаления

🔥12❤8🤬6👍3🤔2🥰2

30 Oct 2026, 19:56 UTC≈8,650 views36 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Video

⚡️ Обзор парашюта в песочнице

❤22🥰10👏4

30 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC≈9,150 views69 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Парашют возможно скоро добавят в игру он был замечен в файлах игры

🔥37👍12❤8👏4🥰4🤬2👎1😁1

30 Oct 2026, 13:06 UTC≈8,210 views35 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Новая рулетка со скином на военную броню

👍22👎6🔥4🥰2❤1

30 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈8,270 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Вышла обнова в основной версии игры

🔥8👍2❤1🎃1👏1🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 21:08 UTC≈9,190 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

⚡️ Спойлеры от разрабов в новом выпуске новостей

🔥25❤4👍4👏3🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @Oxide_Newsss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Oxide_Newsss edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @Oxide_Newsss as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OXIDE NEWS” (@Oxide_Newsss), 20,505 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oxide_Newsss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.