Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ожаровский⚡️☢️

Channel

Ожаровский⚡️☢️

@Ozharovsky

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,118subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001390264772
TypeChannel
Username@Ozharovsky
Created9 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ozharovsky

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0982,1182,1086 August 2026 — 2,100 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,100 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,101 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,100 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,101 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,103 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,099 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,098 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,101 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,105 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,106 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,109 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,114 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,118 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,095–2,121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 05:382,118+4
12 Sept 2026, 06:372,114+5
8 Sept 2026, 06:402,109+3
2 Sept 2026, 21:082,106+1
31 Aug 2026, 00:142,105+4
28 Aug 2026, 03:552,101+3
25 Aug 2026, 03:582,098-1
21 Aug 2026, 14:072,099-4
18 Aug 2026, 19:562,103+2
16 Aug 2026, 02:352,101+1
12 Aug 2026, 23:122,100-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:032,101+2
6 Aug 2026, 07:212,099-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:182,100no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:192,100first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 11s
Average length
3m 04s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

357 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10529.4%
9426.3%
🤝5515.4%
😢308.40%
🔥277.56%
😱164.48%
👎61.68%
🤔51.40%
🤣51.40%
🤪51.40%
😁20.56%
🤯20.56%
🤷20.56%
👏10.28%
😐10.28%
😨10.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ozharovsky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC379 views9 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

"В прошлом году Физик-ядерщик Андрей Ожаровский в беседе со Zvezdanews объяснял, что плутоний невозможно утилизировать. Поэтому выход России из соглашения об утилизации плутония с США носил формальный характер. Москва и Вашингтон, после заключения соответствующего договора, пытались найти пути уничтожения плутония, однако это не принесло результата. Поэтому 34 тонны, которые накопили обе страны, продолжают лежать мер

👍4🤝31🤣1

11 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC970 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://vkvideo.ru/video-237598403_456239044

👍64👎1🤣1

11 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,000 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В 1950-80 годах Подольский химико-металлургический завод (ПХМЗ) вывозил радиоактивные отходы в карьер близ свалки ТБО "Щербинки". Проведённая общественная экологическая инспекция подтвердила - близ полигона есть участки радиоактивного загрязнения. До данным Экологического атласа Домодедово на "спецполигон" с радиоактивными отходами попало до 20 тонн тория. 0:00 - Подольский химико-металлургический завод вывозил свои

🤝153🔥2👍1🤣1😱1

8 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC864 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thefirstflightPhoto

👩‍🎓 Вебинар «Практическое обнаружение и обследование радиационно опасных участков» — по просьбам участников сообщества проводим вторую встречу с Андреем Ожаровским Радиация, радиоактивность, радиоактивное загрязнение — что это такое, откуда берется, как обнаружить и что с этим делать? На все эти вопросы ответит инженер-физик Андрей Ожаровский. Андрей в свободное от преподавательской работы время занимается поиском

👍107🔥4🤪1😁1

8 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC796 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Видео-отчёт (шесть часов за 40 минут!) об обследовании радиоактивного леса близ Электростали. Замеры с вступлением и заключением. Кому замеры не интересны - сразу смотите "Кто виноват и что делать". Подробное обследование "шатровых складов" - участков радиоактивного загрязнения ураном и радием в несколько тысяч квадратных метров в лесу близ подмосковной Электростали. Загрязнение возникло когда предприятие (которое с

14👍7🤯2🤝1🤪1

6 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,070 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Свидетельства того, что крупнейший могильник радиоактивных отходов в Сергиево Посадском районе Подмосковья протекает. Обследованы берега ручья, вытекающего с территории могильника. Цезиевое загрязнение обнаружено у берега. К сожалению, из-за ливня обследование завершить не удалось... 0:00 - Крупнейшая свалка радиоактивных отходов - ФГУП "Радон" 0:24 - Через территорию предприятия протекает ручей 0:47 - В 2020 году п

9👍7🤝6😱4🤪2👎1😐1😨1

1 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,030 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤝54🔥2👍1🤪1😱1

1 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,090 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Радиоактивное болото, в которое попадали стоки с могильников росатомовского завода в Электростали 0:00 - 9,55 мкЗв/ч (955 мкР/ч) на радиоактивном болоте 0:55 - грунты болота попадают в категорию "радиоактивные отходы" - по данным Росатома 1:15 - 10 мкЗв/ч (1000 мкР/ч=1 мР/ч) - в лунке 1:30 - протекающий могильник - вид через забор. https://youtu.be/b5jJtiRHilM

👍127🤝5🤔1

27 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC≈1,340 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://vkvideo.ru/video-237598403_456239038

9🤝6😱3

27 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,220 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Подробное обследование радиоактивного ручья Б2, вытекающего с территории могильника радиоактивных отходов (хвостохранилища) росатомовского завода по производству ядерного топлива в подмосковной Электростали. 0:26 - Вступление - радиоактивный ручей несёт радиоактивное загрязнение в Субботино. Рассказ про AtomFast. 1:35 - Первый участок радиоактивного загрязнения - прямо на дороге. 1,24 мкЗв/ч. На спектре - радий-226.

🤝76🔥4😱3👍1😢1

17 Jun 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,250 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Украина и Великобритания заключили соглашение на сумму 281,4 миллиона долларов о поставках обогащённого урана для украинской государственной компании «Энергоатом», которая обеспечивает более половины потребностей страны в электроэнергии. Об этом сообщила канцелярия премьер-министра Великобритании Кира Стармера. Соглашение было достигнуто в ходе недавнего визита Владимира Зеленского в Лондон. Согласно договору, брита

👍4🤔42🔥2👎1

13 Jun 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,380 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

О могильнике ториевых отходов властям хорошо известно. Из экологического атласа Домодедово

👍19😢122

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Ozharovsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ожаровский⚡️☢️” (@Ozharovsky), 2,118 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ozharovsky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.