https://t.me/profnourbac2025
🔥1

Channel
@PHILO_PROF_RIDHA
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,514subscribers
-139 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002236125563 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PHILO_PROF_RIDHA |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PHILO_PROF_RIDHA |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 7,514 | +115 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 7,399 | +104 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 7,295 | +129 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:08 | 7,166 | -47 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 7,213 | -50 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 7,263 | -42 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 7,305 | -68 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 7,373 | -42 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 7,415 | -69 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 7,484 | -74 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 7,558 | -81 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 7,639 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 7,653 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 7,653 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
219 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 122 | 55.7% | |
| 🤣 | 44 | 20.1% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 7.31% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 4.57% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 4.11% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 2.74% | |
| 😨 | 4 | 1.83% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.37% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.913% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.913% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.457% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/profnourbac2025
🔥1
" رضا " لمادة الفلسفة بكالوريا pinned «السلام عليكم خوتي ❤️ صباحكم خير بحول لله راح نبداو قبل سبتمبر بأيام قليلة راح تكون بزاف صوالح جدد هذا العام راح نخبركم على 3 منها : 1.كتاب "منهج الفيلسوف" نسخة جديدة معدلة ✅️ 2 .كتاب "مقال الفيلسوف" فيه جميع مقالات شعبة اداب و فلسفة جديد لأول مرة …»
السلام عليكم خوتي ❤️ صباحكم خير بحول لله راح نبداو قبل سبتمبر بأيام قليلة راح تكون بزاف صوالح جدد هذا العام راح نخبركم على 3 منها : 1.كتاب "منهج الفيلسوف" نسخة جديدة معدلة ✅️ 2 .كتاب "مقال الفيلسوف" فيه جميع مقالات شعبة اداب و فلسفة جديد لأول مرة ✅️ 3.سنة ثانية منسيتكمش ✅️ و بزاف صوالح راح نحطهم هذا العام ❤️ قريبا إن شاء لله..... رابط القناة : https://t.me/PHILO_PROF_RIDHA
❤10
يولي لي ميهدرش انجليزية ميعتبرش انسان اصلا و يلقب باللقب الشهير : " الكهل "
🤣15❤5😁3
كاين حاجة راها تصرا : انو الوزارة راها تركز على اللغة الانجليزية بطريقة رهيبة مما يعني انو الانجليزية راح تولي طاغية في الجيل تاع 5 سنين جاية ركزو على هذا اللغة لي حب ينجح في حياتو مسقبلا
❤20
واش عطوكم تخصصات ؟
❤2🥰1
الفلسفة تودع تلاميذ الشعب العلمية بقلب مكسور 💔 كانت دفعة 2026 هي أخر محطة للفلسفة معكم ستكمل الطريق مع أبنائها الأوفياء تلاميذ #آداب_وفلسفة
😢8🤣7❤6😁3
قريبا ......🤔
❤13🤔3✍1
Channel photo updated
خوتي تخصص كي تجي تخير خير على زوج معاييير وتقيس بالترتيب تاعهم اول معيار و لي هو الخدمة اذا كان تخصص مفيهش مستقبل معندك مدير بيه ثاني معيار ولي هو الميول و لا رغبة تاعك شوف نتا وشراك حاب و صوالح لي تميللهم مش خويا و عمي و والديا واش يبغو ندير هذي حياتك نتا و نتا لي راه تكمل فيها و تخصص مهوش حاجة دير و خلاص راها نقطة تحول و اكبر منعطف في حياتك و اختيار تخصص لازم ميخرجش على هذو زوج معايير✅️ و ربي يوفقكم خوت…
❤7👏7
ارسلولي نشوف نقاط الفلسفة ⬇️ @Prof_Ridha_p
❤1
اما بالنسبة لإختيار التخصص هذا بروحو راه موضوع متشعب بزاف راح نهدر عليه
❤10👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @PHILO_PROF_RIDHA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“" رضا " لمادة الفلسفة بكالوريا” (@PHILO_PROF_RIDHA), 7,514 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PHILO_PROF_RIDHA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.