Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PHIRAGE

Channel

PHIRAGE

@PHIRAGE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003158763465
TypeChannel
Username@PHIRAGE
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PHIRAGE

Growth

7274737 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers8 September 2026 — 74 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 32 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 09:2174+2
9 Aug 2026, 22:4672no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:0372first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53462801951899218322828.3%
custom 53461203193272951751818.2%
custom 54336928685417145551717.2%
custom 53461031437530744871414.1%
custom 51885789861747261441212.1%
custom 518829084540877365155.05%
custom 524916665100535556344.04%
11.01%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC75 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ˡᵒˢᵗ ⁱⁿ ᵃ ᵈʳᵉᵃᵐ @kalemaan by me

custom 53461203193272951757custom 53462801951899218326custom 52491666510053555633custom 51882908454087736511custom 53461031437530744871custom 54336928685417145551

22 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC126 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

@baaambi1 by @phirage

custom 534628019518992183210custom 51885789861747261446custom 53461031437530744874custom 51882908454087736512custom 52491666510053555631

5 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC151 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @roshaguchinskyPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53461031437530744877custom 51885789861747261446custom 534628019518992183261custom 53461203193272951751

12 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC196 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

@aaarteeemeee by me

custom 543369286854171455516custom 534612031932729517510custom 53462801951899218326custom 51882908454087736512custom 53461031437530744872

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @PHIRAGE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PHIRAGE” (@PHIRAGE), 74 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PHIRAGE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.