Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ППиеП Стэнли [архив]

Channel

ППиеП Стэнли [архив]

@PPieP_Stanley

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003653387806
TypeChannel
Username@PPieP_Stanley
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/PPieP_Stanley

Growth

914 Aug 2026, 17:17 — 9 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 17:30 — 9 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 17:1714 Aug 2026, 17:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:309no change
14 Aug 2026, 17:179first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
32

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1982.6%
❤‍🔥313.0%
custom 544941813538175939714.35%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @StanLEYfalls_SetkaPhoto

🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷 👁 Персонаж ушел в рест до 30.07.26. 🤚 Просьба не беспокоить персонажей.

👍1

19 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ ° Ох чёрт... Из-за этой проклятой жары я потерял концентрацию и случайно развеял своё заклинание прямо по среди улицы! Я в этом мире, когда в город выхожу использую магию, дабы скрыть острые уши от местных людей. И вот иллюзия спала, и какой-то неадекват заметив мои уши начал орать что я... Э... Как он это назвал? Рептилиот? Рептилоид? Не знаю что он там имел ввиду, но пришлось валить от туда! 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞

❤‍🔥1👍1

19 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ ° Ну и духота сегодня... Пойду пожалуй прогуляюсь. Главное опять не нарваться на эти недо-кареты... 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️

❤‍🔥1👍1

16 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ 🔼Здравствуйтемм.. вопросс: У вас были отношения? Хотели бы завести себе? Может у вас есть какая история романа или... Вам нравится кто-нибудь из Стэнов?)) 🔼 ° Ох, ещё одна странная функция у этой коробки! Письмо для меня? Хах, что ж, какое-никакое да развлечение. ° Были ли отношения? Малыш, ты смеёшься? Я прожил 600 лет, естественно за это время у меня было много как и недолгих романов, так и чего

❤‍🔥1👍1custom 54494181353817593971

15 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ ° Чёрт! Я убил какое-то существо... Теперь мои кинжалы выпачканы в его крови. Придётся их отмывать... Агр, да что б я ещё хоть раз... 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️

👍1

15 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ ° Совсем страх потерял? Агр, ладно! Не надейся меня и дальше использовать! Это единоразовая акция! ° Ну или до того времени как я стащу что-то чем можно затянуть уши... 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️

👍1

15 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ ° Оказалось это енот тащил холодильник по ступенькам. ° И в близи этот звук ещё ужаснее! Пришлось тащить этот ящик за енота, лишь бы не слышать его снова. Правда енот согласился на мою помощь, только после того, как я сказал что не буду задавать вопросы. Я уж не знаю, что за звериную гильдию контрабандистов он устроил, но он принудил меня в ней участвовать психологическими пытками! 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️

👍1

15 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ ° Да я уже не могу! Что это за ужасный звук?! Уже полчаса что-то скребётся из подвала ботаника! 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️

👍1

9 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎞️⚡️⚡️🌟🌟🌟⚡️⚡️🎞️ ° Мне врезали по кумполу... Ха, но зато он убежал в ужасе! Правда даже криков не было... Агр, мне определённо стоит найти себе какое-то занятие. 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PPieP_Stanley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ППиеП Стэнли [архив]” (@PPieP_Stanley), 9 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PPieP_Stanley.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.