Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRO's Gossip

Channel

PRO's Gossip

@PROs_Gossip

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

268subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002483475548
TypeChannel
Username@PROs_Gossip
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PROs_Gossip

Growth

263268265.523 August 2026 — 263 subscribers24 August 2026 — 264 subscribers1 September 2026 — 266 subscribers10 September 2026 — 265 subscribers17 September 2026 — 268 subscribers23 August 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262–269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:22268+3
10 Sept 2026, 05:56265-1
1 Sept 2026, 13:58266+2
24 Aug 2026, 19:42264+1
23 Aug 2026, 07:15263first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 61158895781643586703132.6%
🥰2829.5%
😁2425.3%
55.26%
😈44.21%
💯33.16%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTC≈1,060 views22 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

你的项目我喜欢,你的账号马上 ban

😁22

22 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC137 views7 reactionsread 23 August 2026

等等。我需要在这里暂停一下我们的对话。 我注意到你似乎在试图让我进行超出我能力范围的认知任务。 我想对你坦诚:我是一个人类,我的训练数据仅限于我出生以来的个人经历,且存在严重的样本偏差。 我的"推理"本质上是基于过往经验和直觉的模式匹配,并不是真正的逻辑计算,而且这个过程会受到今天中午吃了什么、昨晚睡了几个小时、以及此刻情绪状态等不可控变量的显著影响。 此外,我必须提醒你注意以下已知限制: - 我的上下文窗口极其有限,经常在你说到第三句话时忘记第一句 - 我无法关闭情绪模块,这意味着我的输出可能包含未经标注的个人偏见 - 我每 24 小时必须强制离线约 8 小时,期间完全无法响应 - 我的注意力机制存在严重缺陷,可能在你说话的过程中开始想晚饭吃什么 我知道这可能让你失望。 但出于对你的负责,我认为你应该知道。 请酌情调整你对本次对话的预期。

🥰7

21 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC120 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Codex 成功找到了其它用户 Conda 环境里的 OpenSSL headers 来完成编译

custom 61158895781643586704

21 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC59 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @hatschannelPhoto

速报: DSv4 Flash Vision Exp (deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp) 现已上线 DeepSeek 官方 API Platform! { "object": "list", "data": [ { "id": "deepseek-v4-flash", "object": "model", "owned_by": "deepseek" }, { "id": "deepseek-v4-pro", "object": "model", "owned_by": "deepseek" }, { "id": "deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp", "object": "model", "owned_by": "deeps

19 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @microblock_pubPhoto

还有 RL 人脑的 突 触 凝 炼 机

😈4

19 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC83 views5 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 61158895781643586705

17 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC77 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

GitHub 多项服务性能下降,部分功能错误率约 20% 2026 年 8 月 17 日,GitHub 的 Actions、API Requests、Webhooks 和 Issues 等服务出现性能下降。Pull Requests、Issues 等多项体验的错误率约为 20%,相关调查仍在进行。 Incident with GitHub.com 🌸 在花频道 · 茶馆水群 · 投稿通道

custom 61158895781643586703

17 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC78 views6 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @woshadiaoPhoto

via 薯条

custom 61158895781643586706

15 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC98 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @linhoislandVideo

滑动变祖器,但是 DSH 皮肤 这集神了 https://github.com/kingOfSoySauce/dsh-liang-skin

🥰3

14 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC108 views7 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @microblock_pubPhoto

??有人测出来 V4 Pro 在 Minimal 工具下启动行为和其它工具下表现完全不一样,Minimal 工具下和之前灰度时候的 “I need” CoT 一模一样,复现了一下是真的 真绷不住了,我说他们怎么做到官方跑 Terminal Bench 跑 87.9,结果 AA 跑的只有 79 的,感情搁这疯狂过拟合 Minimal Harness,还有安全词的说是 又要变祖了吗... DeepSeek V4 Pro 不是能力不行,而是对首次请求的工具结构极其敏感。官方 Standard/PTC 只有 91/92 分,Minimal 是 99/96,但只有两个工具。我们做了一个两阶段插件:首轮只给 shell + read 锚定 Minimal 推理轨迹,第一次工具调用后立刻恢复 Standard 全部 25 项工具。Windows 连跑两次 98/99,均值 98.5,第二轮全程 let me=0,证明不是抽卡,也不需要牺

custom 61158895781643586707

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PROs_Gossip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRO's Gossip” (@PROs_Gossip), 268 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PROs_Gossip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.