Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRO transport

Channel

PRO transport

@PROtransportr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,147subscribers

+140 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541739263
TypeChannel
Username@PROtransportr
DescriptionВсе, что происходит в мире транспорта, находит в этом канале свое отражение. По вопросам сотрудничества: [email protected]
Created24 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PROtransportr

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,0016,1586,079.56 August 2026 — 6,007 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,007 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,006 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,001 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,002 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,012 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,009 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,008 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,018 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,015 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,030 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,034 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,040 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,043 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,050 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,063 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,123 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,145 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,151 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,147 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,158 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,157 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,148 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,150 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,153 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,147 subscribers6,1476 August 20264 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 90 days, net +140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,977–6,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 04:176,147-6
1 Nov 2026, 01:186,153+3
29 Oct 2026, 01:306,150+2
26 Oct 2026, 07:586,148-9
23 Oct 2026, 02:476,157-1
20 Oct 2026, 06:386,158+11
17 Oct 2026, 05:476,147-4
14 Oct 2026, 11:176,151+6
11 Oct 2026, 05:416,145+22
4 Oct 2026, 21:426,123+60
25 Sept 2026, 17:426,063+13
17 Sept 2026, 09:216,050+7
13 Sept 2026, 14:166,043+3
10 Sept 2026, 01:546,040+6
4 Sept 2026, 12:596,034+4
31 Aug 2026, 20:376,030+15
28 Aug 2026, 18:146,015-3
25 Aug 2026, 14:116,018+10
22 Aug 2026, 18:186,008-1
19 Aug 2026, 10:546,009first reading

Engagement

155 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.06%
avg views ÷ 6,147 subscribers
Avg views / post
557
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 155 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held155 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total36,748
Reactions total401
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,200
Videos
≈5,880
Links
≈17,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 18s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

640 reactions across 105 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7812.2%
❤629.69%
🤔457.03%
🔥426.56%
😱396.09%
👀385.94%
🤣385.94%
👌335.16%
🤬314.84%
😁274.22%
👏264.06%
🤨264.06%
🙊233.59%
😢223.44%
😡172.66%
🙏142.19%
😎101.56%
👎91.41%
🫡91.41%
🤝81.25%
10 further kinds436.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 647 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 155 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PROtransportr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 155 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC161 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

⚡️КамАЗ с поднятым кузовом снес надземный пешеходный переход на Ленинградском шоссе под Солнечногорском. Конструкция упала на дорогу и раздавила кабину, водитель погиб. Движение по трассе перекрыто, на дороге пробки в обе стороны. Подписаться на PRO transport Telegram | MAX

🔥1😢1😱1

6 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC174 viewsread 6 November 2026

⚓️ Суэцкий канал получил доход в размере $724 млн, что является наивысшим показателем с начала атак хуситов по судам в Красном море в 2023 году, заявил глава администрации Суэцкого канала Усама Рабиа. По сравнению с октябрем прошлого года доходы от транзита выросли почти в два раза (94%), количество судов — на 32%, а тоннаж — на 86%. Подписаться на PRO transport Telegram | MAX

6 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC327 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Праздничный залп в честь 175-летия железной дороги Санкт-Петербург – Москва в Петропавловской крепости произвëл глава РЖД Олег Белозёров. «Это знаменательный для нас день: 175 лет назад вместе с запуском движения по магистрали между Санкт-Петербургом и Москвой был дан старт развитию сети железнодорожного транспорта всей России. Сегодня железная дорога не только связывает две столицы, но и объединяет историю транспор…

👏2🔥2😁2🍾1🏆1🫡1

6 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC446 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

⚓️ Учредитель транспортно-логистической компании VIG Транс Игорь Ребельский рассказал Бизнес ФМ, что перевозки через южные порты стали небезопасными. Его компания уже сталкивалась с попаданием дронов в контейнеровозы и потерей гражданских грузов. Ущерб составил около 400–500 тысяч долларов. «В любом случае, южный морской путь встал, и возможности безопасно транспортировать товары сейчас нет». Компания не пользуетс…

🤔2😢2🤨1

6 Nov 2026, 12:25 UTC≈2,200 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

⚡️ Четыре вагона скоростного пассажирского поезда "Кармабхуми экспресс", следовавшего по маршруту Амритсар – Нью-Джалпайгури, загорелись в Индии во время движения состава. Людям пришлось эвакуироваться на ходу из охваченных огнем и густым дымом вагонов. После срабатывания системы безопасности состав был остановлен. Подписаться на PRO transport Telegram | MAX

👀2😱2🔥1🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 11:25 UTC504 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Около трех тонн мазута вылилось на дорогу в результате опрокидывания тягача в Татарстане на 385 км дороги Р-239 недалеко от поселка Новозареченск Бавлинского района. Подписаться на PRO transport Telegram | MAX

😱4😢3😡1

6 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC530 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

В Хабаровском крае мужчина из ревности поджег машину бывшей жены и отправил ей видео. Все происходящее он снимал на видео, а когда женщина получила ролик, то сразу обратилась в полицию. Мужчина признался в содеянном и обязался возместить ущерб в 200 тысяч рублей. Подписаться на PRO transport Telegram | MAX

🤔2🤨2😱2🔥1😡1🙊1

6 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC507 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @gkNPSVideo

Вес взят! На строительстве ВСМ Москва – Санкт-Петербург специалисты Нацпроектстроя впервые провели тестовую установку 700-тонной мостовой балки. Ранее подобные конструкции не применялись в нашей стране. Балку изготовили на полигоне Селинское и установили в пролет путепровода длиной около 800 метров. Операция требует высокой точности. С полигона к месту монтажа балку везут два транспортера грузоподъёмностью по 450 т…

👍4👌2🏆1🔥1🤣1

6 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC529 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Власти японского острова Хоккайдо зафиксировали 57 случаев наезда поездов на Медведей в 2025 финансовом году, которые завершились в марте 2026 года. Это стало рекордом за все время проведения такой статистики с учетом прошлого века, скажем, в регионе региональной железнодорожной компании JR Хоккайдо. С апреля по конец октября текущего года, по этим данным, отмечено уже 36 подобных инцидентов. Это немного по сравнен…

🤔3❤1👀1😱1🙊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @PROtransportr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@PROtransportr edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Минтранс России
@Mintrans_Russia · 43,319
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
🔴🟡🟢 Города в потоке
@citiesinmotion · 31,072
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Vgudok
@Vgudok · 27,804
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Автодор
@avtodorgk · 67,164
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Грузопоток
@gruz0potok · 37,076
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
МОСКВА LIVE 🔴
@moscow117 · 101,109
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
Росавиация
@favt_ru · 28,194
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Логистика 2.0
@logistica_2_0 · 60,605
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
СпецДорПроект
@spetsdor · 28,516
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
Пристегните ремни | авиация
@premni · 30,541
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Темникова Юлия
@temnikova_yuliya · 31,774
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
По SUти
@aeroflot_pr · 50,740
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Телеграмма РЖД
@telerzd · 68,059
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Говорит Росавиация
@favt_info · 164,232
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Госавтоинспекция России
@guobddrus · 30,249
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Логистика без границ
@logisticsscm · 37,408
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Наша колея 1520
@NashaKoleya · 46,353
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Марат Хуснуллин
@mkhusnullin · 226,307
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Майский указ
@maydecree · 19,461
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRO transport” (@PROtransportr), 6,147 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PROtransportr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.