Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 9 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @rstvali. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 36 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,884–2,953 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 00:39
2,892
-3
7 Sept 2026, 05:57
2,895
-2
2 Sept 2026, 20:05
2,897
-6
30 Aug 2026, 08:37
2,903
-9
27 Aug 2026, 09:22
2,912
-6
24 Aug 2026, 06:54
2,918
-10
20 Aug 2026, 11:08
2,928
-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:57
2,929
-3
14 Aug 2026, 09:37
2,932
-9
11 Aug 2026, 12:05
2,941
-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:24
2,944
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:17
2,945
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
80 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
42
52.5%
❤
20
25.0%
custom 5294118392905623955
17
21.3%
👌
1
1.25%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EURUSD🇪🇺
Всем привет! По евро цена продолжает зажиматься внутри ключевого KL в виде 1M FVG & 1M MTV . Я уверен что мы получим нисходящее расширение , вопрос лишь как это произойдет
Пока у меня 2 основных сценария : первый через зону 1D RB в которой цена сейчас находится . Второй сценарий - это re-raid дневного фрактала
Поэтому при входе в позиции учитывайте то что цена может сделать re-raid и выставляйте стоп шире…
🌳 Торговый план с разбором всех основных инструментов
https://youtu.be/tB4JhVmITM8?si=RH2C9s98bvXGm8H-
В этом видео поделился своими мыслями по рынку и также рассказал о торговом плане , который мы составили внутри комьюнити
Приятного просмотра❣️
Всем привет! Кто торгует крипту , но хотел бы попробовать форекс / металы / акции , то на Bing X сейчас доступен TradeFi на котором вы можете торговать внутри биржи все основные активы ( EURUSD , GBPUSD , XAUUSD и дрг )
Также если вы не зарегистрированы там , вы можете получить халявные USDT в видео ваучеров и тестовых USDT для торговли , поэтому если еще не регистрировались , то можете попробовать
🌳Ссылка на торго…
EURUSD🇪🇺
Всем привет! Торговая неделя достаточно интересная выход , особенно последние 3 дня . На рынке наконец то появилась волатильность , которая формируется на базе FOMC и интервенции Японии
Сегодня закрывается месяц и важно будет посмотреть на формирование новых переменных , для построения качественного торгового плана . Поэтому сейчас не спешите с решениями и дождитесь закрытия недели/месяца и составьте план …
EURUSD +2% 🇪🇺
Вчера закрывал трейд по евро на локальном таргете , так как нынешнее ценообразование не позволяет сильно передерживать трейды. После закрытия позиции , цена достаточно агрессивно ушла выше , что указывает на устойчивый спрос у данных отметок
Сегодня будет ставка ФРС и выступление Уорша , поэтому будьте бдительны с позициями , особенно с короткими стопами перед новостями . Идею трейда озвучивал в видео…
EURUSD🇪🇺
Всем привет ! По евро сейчас нарратив у меня лонговый и сейчас важно обращать внимание на то откуда начнется расширение выше
Так как цена продолжает консолидироваться в зоне 1M fractal raid & 3M FVG , расширение может произойти в любой момент . Я выделяю для себя 2 основных сценария , благодаря которым я буду реализовывать данное движение
Первый сценарий - это 1W fractal re-raid и только после этого расши…
Jule торговля
Июль с точки зрения PA для многих проще и хорошим примером простоты будет движение фунта , которое я описывал выше . Многие в комьюнити реализовали данное движение , при чем совершено разными способами , что говорит о легком PA для реализации идей
Я думаю ,что и в открытом канале некоторые реализовали данное движение , так как я озвучивал идею еще на weekly review. Надеюсь что вы июль также провели ка…
Какие позиции удалось реализовать в начале Q3 ?
https://youtu.be/dl-HlBrcPnc?si=UP7vcVP0St6Yy_YJ
В этом видео я рассказал об позициях и планах , которые у нас были внутри комьюнити . Также поделился мыслями по чарту на ближайшее время
Приятного просмотра❣️
GBPUSD 🇬🇧
Всем привет! Кто смотрел weekly review из community знали о моем нарративе по фунту заранее и сейчас цена частично уже исполнила его
В результате балансировки weekly DR , снятия двух 1W fractal high я ожидал что цена получит такое же быстрое поглощение . В течении прошлой недели мы частично поглотили восходящее движение и сформировали 1W rejection , что указывает на актуальное давление продаж
На этой нед…
🔥3❤1custom 52941183929056239551
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @PTTMentorship. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@PTTMentorship named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@rstvali named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Волновой Анализ 🥇 @Elliotrading · 50,396 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PTT Наставничество” (@PTTMentorship), 2,892 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PTTMentorship.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
