Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PW CLAT

Channel

PW CLAT

@PWCLATWallah

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,130subscribers

+1,425 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941372558
TypeChannel
Username@PWCLATWallah
Description✅ Welcome to our PW CLAT telegram channel! Guidance📖, Mentorship👩‍🏫, and Strategy💡 Join Us and Secure Your Place at NLUs with our guidance 🏛️ 🔗 linktr.ee/clatbatches
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PWCLATWallah

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

20,70522,13021,417.57 August 2026 — 20,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,705 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,718 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,770 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,801 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,827 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,856 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,878 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,922 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,950 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,976 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,988 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,017 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,030 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,066 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,083 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,120 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,133 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,180 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,212 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,242 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,252 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,263 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,291 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,319 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,339 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,358 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,384 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,407 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,429 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,418 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,444 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,471 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,512 subscribers25 September 2026 — 21,612 subscribers4 October 2026 — 21,785 subscribers8 October 2026 — 21,864 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,907 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,921 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,931 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,947 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,958 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,961 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,949 subscribers21 October 2026 — 21,948 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,964 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,966 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,969 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,010 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,026 subscribers27 October 2026 — 22,035 subscribers28 October 2026 — 22,058 subscribers30 October 2026 — 22,061 subscribers31 October 2026 — 22,082 subscribers1 November 2026 — 22,100 subscribers2 November 2026 — 22,110 subscribers3 November 2026 — 22,130 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 88 days, net +1,425. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,491–22,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 14:2422,130+20
2 Nov 2026, 10:4622,110+10
1 Nov 2026, 10:1522,100+18
31 Oct 2026, 13:4422,082+21
30 Oct 2026, 13:5722,061+3
28 Oct 2026, 09:1522,058+23
27 Oct 2026, 11:0822,035+9
26 Oct 2026, 12:4922,026+16
25 Oct 2026, 10:1722,010+41
24 Oct 2026, 09:3721,969+3
23 Oct 2026, 06:5021,966+2
22 Oct 2026, 09:3121,964+16
21 Oct 2026, 01:4721,948-1
20 Oct 2026, 03:2821,949-12
19 Oct 2026, 00:1621,961+3
17 Oct 2026, 21:2821,958+11
16 Oct 2026, 17:5721,947+16
15 Oct 2026, 17:1621,931+10
14 Oct 2026, 17:0121,921+14
13 Oct 2026, 05:3721,907first reading

Engagement

190 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.82%
avg views ÷ 22,130 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 190 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held190 (3 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total89,074
Reactions total630
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 02:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,060
Videos
≈203
Links
≈2,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 52s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,972 reactions across 180 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,06452.0%
😭55714.0%
👍48912.3%
🔥1774.46%
😁1664.18%
😱1233.10%
😢1122.82%
👀791.99%
🤩711.79%
❤‍🔥501.26%
🥰330.831%
🆒210.529%
👏160.403%
🤓70.176%
🦄70.176%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,972 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (2.44%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,820 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤21

3 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,830 views35 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Last 30 days strategy for clat 2027👀

❤29🥰2🆒2❤‍🔥1👍1

3 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,850 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Reasoning PYQ Solutions | Complete Question Analysis for CLAT 2027 LIVE class join now🔴👇 https://www.youtube.com/live/R7c46kWWItE?si=enbnB6NQV5g6cnNG

❤2

3 Nov 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,910 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Delhi center was buzzing with intense focus and determination today! ' Our students giving it their all at the PW CLAT Real Test. How was your experience? Drop your thoughts below👇

❤3

3 Nov 2026, 04:01 UTC≈1,950 views15 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🔴Negligence and Duty of Care Negligence generally involves a failure to exercise the care that a reasonable person would use in the relevant circumstances, resulting in legally recognised harm. In a typical negligence problem, the analysis considers duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damage. Duty of care concerns whether a person was legally required to take reasonable care towards another. Breach occurs …

👍10❤4🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,960 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

5Which of the following statements correctly explains the protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3)?

  1. A. It protects every person questioned during an investigation.5%
  2. B. It protects an accused person from being compelled to be a witness against themselves.92%
  3. C. It prohibits all forms of physical evidence collection2%
  4. D. It applies only after conviction.0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥4

2 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,900 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

4.The principle of Nullum crimen sine lege means

  1. A. No punishment without trial.31%
  2. B. No crime without law.29%
  3. C. No person can be arrested twice.27%
  4. D. Every accused must be granted bail.13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤5

2 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,830 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

3.A High Court refuses to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 solely because an alternative statutory remedy is available. Which statement is legally correct?

  1. A. The High Court has no jurisdiction whenever an alternative remedy exists.5%
  2. B. The existence of an alternative remedy is generally a rule of discretion, not an absolute bar.92%
  3. C. Article 226 can only be used against private individuals.2%
  4. D. The High Court must always reject such petitions.0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4

2 Nov 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,820 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

2.According to Lon L. Fuller, which of the following is NOT one of the eight principles of the internal morality of law?

  1. A. Generality2%
  2. B. Publicity11%
  3. C. Retroactivity11%
  4. D. Congruence between official action and76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4

2 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,800 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

1.In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000 primarily because:

  1. A. It violated the right to privacy under Article 21.14%
  2. B. It imposed unreasonable restrictions on freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).83%
  3. C. It violated the right against exploitation.2%
  4. D. It interfered with the powers of the Election Commission.1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤8👀2

2 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,930 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

----------------------------------------------------- 📕CLAT 2027: Month-Wise Current Affairs Most Important Topics | Mission 100 Days To CLAT LIVE join now🔴👇 https://www.youtube.com/live/sAZrNlLASXY?si=DhCGD6Bps-3pS5hi

👍4❤1

2 Nov 2026, 06:44 UTC≈2,020 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🚨Big Update for CLAT 2027 Aspirants!🚨

👍9❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @PWCLATWallah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @PWCLATWallah as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz645 voters

5Which of the following statements correctly explains the protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3)?

  1. A. It protects every person questioned during an investigation.5%
  2. B. It protects an accused person from being compelled to be a witness against themselves.92%
  3. C. It prohibits all forms of physical evidence collection2%
  4. D. It applies only after conviction.0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz629 voters

4.The principle of Nullum crimen sine lege means

  1. A. No punishment without trial.31%
  2. B. No crime without law.29%
  3. C. No person can be arrested twice.27%
  4. D. Every accused must be granted bail.13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz616 voters

3.A High Court refuses to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 solely because an alternative statutory remedy is available. Which statement is legally correct?

  1. A. The High Court has no jurisdiction whenever an alternative remedy exists.5%
  2. B. The existence of an alternative remedy is generally a rule of discretion, not an absolute bar.92%
  3. C. Article 226 can only be used against private individuals.2%
  4. D. The High Court must always reject such petitions.0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz609 voters

2.According to Lon L. Fuller, which of the following is NOT one of the eight principles of the internal morality of law?

  1. A. Generality2%
  2. B. Publicity11%
  3. C. Retroactivity11%
  4. D. Congruence between official action and76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz679 voters

1.In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000 primarily because:

  1. A. It violated the right to privacy under Article 21.14%
  2. B. It imposed unreasonable restrictions on freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).83%
  3. C. It violated the right against exploitation.2%
  4. D. It interfered with the powers of the Election Commission.1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 12:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz682 voters

5.The Ilbert Bill controversy (1883) primarily exposed which contradiction in British colonial rule?

  1. A. Conflict between the British and French trading companies25%
  2. B. Racial discrimination within the colonial judicial system50%
  3. C. Disagreement over land revenue policies6%
  4. D. Conflict between princely states and the British Parliament19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

GK Infinity by Prakhar Mishra
@prakhargk · 2,535
#1
National Law Training Institute
@lawNLTI · 11,745
#2
𝐖𝐄 𝐆𝐎 𝐍𝐋𝐔 ( 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 )
@Legal_edge_mock · 15,349
#3
FLAMES CLAT/AILET LAW ENTRANCE ACADEMY
@flamesclat · 5,181
#4
ORIGIN CLAT - Abhyuday Pandey
@originclat · 28,270
#5
12 Minutes to CLAT
@twelveminutestoclat · 27,799
#6
CLAT POINT: CLAT, Law Exams Prep, NLSAT & Online Coaching
@clatpoint · 5,422
#7
𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗧 𝗪𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗵 | 𝗖𝗪
@CLAT_Wallah_CW · 13,751
#8
CLAT PLUSS (Official)
@anurag_clatplus · 1,465
#9
LegalEdge CLAT Preparation by Toprankers
@LegalEdge · 47,695
#10
WE GO NLU (CLAT Materials/Mock)
@cl_material · 5,051
#11
Maths by Pramod yadav
@pramodyadavpw · 7,214
#12
CLAT Buddy
@CLATBuddy · 5,384
#13
Law Prep Tutorial - CLAT Coaching
@lawpreptutorial · 42,836
#14
ALLEN CLAT
@ALLENACECLAT · 1,934
#15
CLAT community | Place for CLAT 2027 Aspirants
@clatcommunity2026 · 2,969
#16
CL-LST CLAT Institute
@LST4LAW · 7,430
#17
𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐌𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐒 ( 𝐖𝐀𝐕𝐄𝐒 )
@allmocksclatwaves · 7,121
#18
CMP CLAT Channel l CLAT Mentorship Program Channel by Akansh Jain HNLU
@clatmentorshipprogramchannel · 6,179
#19
CLAT CLUSTER || CLAT UG 2027-2028
@clat_cluster · 1,955
#20
𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗧 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟳 l 𝗠𝗢𝗖𝗞𝗦 / 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗟𝗦
@CLAT2027MOCK · 13,791
#21
𝙇𝙖𝙬𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖™ | CLAT & AILET
@clat_lawmania · 7,018
#22
PRIME AP CLAT AILET Entrance
@primeapjpr · 1,384
#23
Clat material community🚀
@Vidhigya_MB · 3,635
#24
Legal Learning Program
@llpclat · 4,164
#25
PW Law Wallah JUDICIARY
@pwlawwallah · 86,368
#26
Current Affairs & Gk | UPSC / SSC
@CurrentAffairs_Free · 2,393 (as read 23 September 2026)
#27
Clat Prep | CLAT 2027 | CLAT 2028 | CLAT coaching
@clatprepeducation · 7,518
#28
CLAT Preparation - iQuanta
@clat_prep · 1,020
#29
CLAT HELP OFFICIAL 2027
@CLAT_HELP_MOCK_2026_OFFICIAL · 2,673
#30
Airdrop Real
@airdropreal8 · 10,055
#31
𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐂𝐑 - 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐇𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮 𝐄𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 | 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐚 by 𝙇𝙖𝙬𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖™
@Daily_CR · 7,846
#32
Only CR by 𝙇𝙖𝙬𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖™
@Cr_LawMania · 2,631
#33
CLAT community | Place for CLAT 2027 | 2028 Aspirants
@CLAT_Community · 2,883
#34
CLAT Possible | CLAT 2027 & AILET Prep
@clatpossibleofficial · 4,384
#35
LAW Entrance Exams by Adda247
@lawentrance_adda247 · 16,624
#36
Law Exam CLAT Legal LSAT PDF
@law_exam_clat_legal_lsat_pdf · 58,334
#37
Law Digest Official
@lawdigestofficial · 1,970
#38
Law Entrance Exams Guidance & Updates
@lawentranceexamME · 1,830
#39
CLAT PG | AILET PG | CUET LLM PG | DU LLM | BHU LLM | ILI LLM
@sambhavlaw · 4,132 (as read 23 September 2026)
#40
𝐏𝐢𝐱𝐢𝔢 𝐆𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐱𝐲🌌💗✨
@gonnabe_me · 904
#41
UPDATES WALLAH | News | Articles | Updates
@updates_wallah · 644
#42
We Go NLU - CLAT/AILET
@WeGoNlu · 2,368
#43
Current Affairs l UPSC l PCS
@yashrajM07 · 557
#44
CLAT AILET LSAT LAW EXAM PDF
@CLAT_AILET_LSAT_LAW_EXAM_PDF · 3,748
#45
Beyond Ranks
@CUET_Materials_CW · 2,012
#46
CURRENT AFFAIRS | GK ( UPSC/SSC/OTHER EXAMS)
@current_affairs_ca_in_english · 10,856 (as read 23 September 2026)
#47
शिव महिमा स्तोत्र
@Shiva_Mahima · 490
#48
LAW NOTES 📚(KSLU)
@lawnoteskslu · 1,771
#49
The Hindu
@THnewsupdates · 248,271
#50
𝘾𝙇𝘼𝙏𝙂𝙍𝘼𝙈™️ | Clat & Ailet
@ClatGram · 7,108
#51
𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐬 & 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐟𝐟𝐬 (𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐖𝐀𝐕𝐄𝐒)
@novelsclatwaves · 1,647
#52
Legal English for Contracts
@legalenglish4you · 384 (as read 23 September 2026)
#53
@nikababy
@nikababytravel · 4,713
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

12 Minutes to CLAT
@twelveminutestoclat · 27,799
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
Law Exam CLAT Legal LSAT PDF
@law_exam_clat_legal_lsat_pdf · 58,334
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
ORIGIN CLAT - Abhyuday Pandey
@originclat · 28,270
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
Law Prep Tutorial - CLAT Coaching
@lawpreptutorial · 42,836
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
LegalEdge CLAT Preparation by Toprankers
@LegalEdge · 47,695
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
PW Law Wallah JUDICIARY
@pwlawwallah · 86,368
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PW CLAT” (@PWCLATWallah), 22,130 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PWCLATWallah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.