Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 55 days, net -243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,475–5,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Oct 2026, 01:51
5,511
-15
26 Oct 2026, 23:37
5,526
-10
23 Oct 2026, 22:06
5,536
-21
21 Oct 2026, 07:15
5,557
-11
18 Oct 2026, 14:45
5,568
-17
15 Oct 2026, 11:45
5,585
-18
12 Oct 2026, 06:56
5,603
-29
5 Oct 2026, 03:38
5,632
-40
26 Sept 2026, 08:18
5,672
-40
15 Sept 2026, 13:19
5,712
-23
11 Sept 2026, 17:39
5,735
-12
7 Sept 2026, 01:41
5,747
-7
4 Sept 2026, 16:22
5,754
no change
4 Sept 2026, 15:47
5,754
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
57s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
153 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
74
48.4%
👍
29
19.0%
🔥
25
16.3%
👏
9
5.88%
🏆
7
4.58%
❤🔥
5
3.27%
🎉
2
1.31%
💯
2
1.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PabloBulletZone. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Last night, I gave the BUY LIMIT setup, but unfortunately price didn’t fully hit our buy limit area before taking off 🚀
And look what happened after that… GOLD flew more than 1,300 pips!📈
This is exactly why I keep telling you guys
A setup can be right even if we don’t get the entry.
Our analysis identified the direction and zone correctly, we were simply unlucky that price didn’t give us the fill.
No chasing. N…
On H1, gold has made 1,200+ pip moves 💥, leaving huge wicks before returning to the zone.
This is driven by the current US–Iran geopolitical escalation 🌍, while USD strength, rising oil prices & higher Treasury yields are creating opposing pressure on gold.
What’s also interesting 🤔 is that while gold is moving this aggressively, DXY itself isn’t showing the same level of volatility.
That’s another reason we need …
Good day, team!☀️
First, I’m sorry I haven’t been able to share any signal these past few days 🙏
But honestly, no signal also means no SL.
Sometimes protecting what we already have is more important than forcing something just to make a profit.
Remember, trading is a long-term game. You won’t become successful because you caught one big trade. You become successful by staying disciplined through hundreds of trade…
Reset the mindset, enjoy the process, and let’s keep moving! 🚀
❤5🔥3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @PabloBulletZone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ARRASH, GOLD TRADER @arrashfxreal · 25,905 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
PAUL XYZ @thepaulxyz · 25,754 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Chief Scalper @CPabloScalper · 29,124 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
Gold Club House @GoldClubHouseOfficial · 24,243 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
Willy Gold Usd @willygoldusd · 35,432 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
MICHAEL FX @MichaelGoldFx · 18,625 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
GOLDZILLA FX @GoldzillaOfficial · 25,341 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
MANTRAS GOLD @mantrasgold · 23,253 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
FABIO GOLD HUNTER @fabioforex · 25,169 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
CURRENCYBOY @CurrencyBoy11 · 24,094 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOREX BY PABLO” (@PabloBulletZone), 5,511 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PabloBulletZone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.