Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Paideuma.TV Internacional

Channel

Paideuma.TV Internacional

@PaideumaTVInternational

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

346subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001627778754
TypeChannel
Username@PaideumaTVInternational
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PaideumaTVInternational

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3403463436 August 2026 — 342 subscribers6 August 2026 — 342 subscribers14 August 2026 — 341 subscribers20 August 2026 — 340 subscribers5 September 2026 — 344 subscribers12 September 2026 — 346 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 20:19346+2
5 Sept 2026, 02:16344+4
20 Aug 2026, 12:24340-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:05341-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:33342no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:05342first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 6 August 2026

Medvedev speaks from the point of view of the Security Council, from the point of view of the real self-awareness of our state. We are in a state of war with the West. I already explained at the beginning why: because we have now risen up against its hegemony. The West treats us as rebels who have carried out a geopolitical revolution and declared: “We no longer submit to you.” They say: “How so? You are part of us, …

30 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC524 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Host: If one looks at the contemporary geopolitical situation, it is difficult to imagine it without such a phenomenon as the social networks of Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev. People treat them differently, but to a certain extent this is both a release of steam and an extremely clear, precise signal that sounds like an extreme. A signal that on the territory of Russia a great state still exists and is developing — no…

30 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC523 viewsread 6 August 2026

In parallel with this, China went by a completely different model. It almost fitted itself into this West, pretending that it fully recognized its rules: in the economy it submitted, in politics it preserved its positions a little, but on the whole it was ready to become part of the global world. And suddenly it turned out that China had its own cunning plan — unlike us. It consisted in making use of the methodologie…

30 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC582 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Host: We planned to start today with the words of Vladimir Putin, with his remarks and the set of theses that were voiced at the meeting with sailors of the Navy in St. Petersburg. In principle, Vladimir Putin did not reveal anything new. Probably no one’s eyes were opened; nothing new or breakthrough was discovered. But once again he reminded us that in certain, rather frequent cases, the behavior of Western countri…

26 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC670 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Julius Evola: Political Traditionalism is essential reading as an introduction to Evola’s oeuvre, a unique showcase of Alexander Dugin’s thought, and a summons to reawaken Traditionalist thinking and action today. https://arktos.com/product/julius-evola-political-traditionalism/

26 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC747 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Moscow, Third Rome, Russia as catacomb and the symphony of powers as a political system, is that also the Russian World? Alexander Dugin: Yes, unquestionably. That is what gave the Russian world the idea of universal scope. That is, thanks to the Byzantine heritage, the idea of a symphony of powers, the idea of Katehon, the Tsar, as the executor of the religious, global and universal mission, aimed at preventing the…

26 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC764 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Russian Geopolitics : An eschatological perspective - Alexander Dugin In this unique interview with Professor Alexander Dugin, we discuss the fundamental concepts underlying the 'Russian World' and Russian geopolitics: Moscow as the Third Rome, the Katechon, the symphony of powers... https://paideuma.tv/en/video/russian-geopolitics-eschatological-perspective-aleksandr-dugin

26 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC555 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

A Conversation with Alexander Dugin in Moscow | Interview by Dr. Ankit Shah https://paideuma.tv/en/video/conversation-alexander-dugin-moscow-interview-dr-ankit-shah

25 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC642 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Host: That raises the next question. Will Russia, China, Iran and North Korea begin a more rapid unification and abandon the reasons you mentioned, trying to eliminate them? Under what conditions? What must happen? Could something truly serious — for example a nuclear strike on Iran — serve as a catalyst? We have already discussed the possibility that the United States may find itself in a position where it has no ch…

25 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC616 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Host: So it is clear that there is no point in trying to reach agreements with the Americans or with the West as a whole. What, then, about internal cooperation among the countries of this Eurasian axis itself? Why are we not deepening our military interaction if all of us — Russia, China, North Korea and Iran — understand perfectly well that we are confronting the West? Alexander Dugin: For two reasons. The first i…

24 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC668 viewsread 6 August 2026

That is why, in my view, we must conclude that negotiations with this overreaching Western power no longer work. They are worthless; we have learned that from our own experience. One can talk about anything, but nothing changes: Washington’s support for Kiev continues, everything goes on as before. I believe the Iranians are showing an example—to us and to the whole of humanity. And to China, which is next. And to No…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PaideumaTVInternational. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Paideuma.TV Internacional” (@PaideumaTVInternational), 346 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PaideumaTVInternational.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.