泡泡的朋友圈🫧 pinned a photo

Channel
泡泡的朋友圈🫧
@PaoPaovi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
189subscribers
+160 since we began measuring on 18 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003978418332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PaoPaovi |
| Created | 17 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 18 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PaoPaovi |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:20 | 189 | +107 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 82 | +43 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 39 | +10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 29 | no change |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 29 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 17 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 69.0%
- avg views ÷ 189 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 130
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (17 October 2026 – 17 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,956 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
海口个人兼职 纯欲版——御姐 🐉莞式一条龙服务🐉 艺名:泡泡🫧 身高:165cm 体重:95斤 胸围:C 800💰1p(40分钟) 1500💰2pp(80分钟) ✨服务:跪式调情、鼻吸过水、舌尖环游、高山流水、🧊🔥冰火两重天、❤️🔥激情娇喘互动、毒龙🐉、胸推、臀推、69互舔、猴子偷桃、海底捞月、口暴、鸳鸯浴、水中箫、激情爱爱 🎉福利:标配震动棒,小跳蛋,免费体验哦(⁎⁍̴̛ᴗ⁍̴̛⁎) 口令红包,定金留位置 🚫嗑药,🚫桩机,🚫偷拍 朋友圈:https://t.me/PaoPaovi 私信我:@PA0PA06 双向联系:@PaoPa0bot
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:香菜 上课时间:5.21 老师花名:#泡泡 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:8 颜值身材:9 服务内容:全套服务 出击体验:很热情的老师,一直微笑上课!动作也很细致,过程不催促很用心,提的小要求都可以满意,下面水多很紧,配合的点位很到位,没来错老哥们,可以来体验, 优点缺点:暂无啥缺点,整体感觉不错 推荐程度:9 联系方式:@PAOPAOTVT 1,需要狼友提交报告 2,需要预约记录 3,需要付款记录,线上支付不需要拍照
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:被我找到了吧 上课时间:5.13 老师花名:泡泡 位置坐标:#南大桥 上课花费:13pp活动优惠 颜值身材:10分 服务内容:全套 莞式一条龙 出击体验:特别热情。.我一个内向的人来到她哪里也很喜欢,到了就给我拿水,拿拖鞋,给我换鞋,然后抱抱我,小姐姐穿短裙很性感,直接让我立起来了,然后给我脱衣服拉我去沐浴,我站那两个奶子在我身上摩擦来去,洗好去了床上开始服务,口活确实太棒啦深喉很厉害👍,服务完姐姐在上面开始啪啪,下面太紧了会吸几分钟就给我干趴下了但是紧确实很舒服……然后一起聊天,特别愉快,让我有回家的感觉,因为性格太太好了,姐姐很健谈和她聊天很舒服开心,后面继续了一发,大汗淋漓,满意而归。下次必返 优点缺点:无 推荐程度:10分 联系方式:@PAOPAOTVT 1,需要狼友提交报告 2,需要预约记录 3,需要付款记录,线上支付不需要拍照
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:随便 上课时间:5.10 老师花名:#泡泡 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:1P 颜值身材:10 服务内容:10 出击体验:10 优点缺点:9 推荐程度:9 有一说一 CJ老师多了 第一次写报告 含金量有多少各位狼友自己评判 看的老师也多了 什么价格什么体验 走颜值赛道1P7-9张的 麻烦您们如果没有很自信的脸 请把你们的妆化上 有很自信的脸 淡妆浓抹总相宜 别标着高价位素颜 去白瞎狼友们的车费和油 走服务赛道的 求你们把态度跟上 谁的米都不是风刮来的 别让双方都不开心 当然狼友们的素质也会跟上 泡泡老师虽是本狼听了当季红人傻周的推荐 同时也是看了桩机大队的报告才选择的CJ 人虽颜值不是特别顶 但至少人家一进门嘴角上扬的角度就没掉过 该有的服务一项没少 提出的要求立刻能满足 不足的地方一说就该 我就问各位狼友 你们CJ的老师有多少能做…
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:匿名 上课时间:5月12日 老师花名:#泡泡 位置坐标:#美兰 上课花费:8P 颜值身材:身材好,皮肤嫩 服务内容:课表上的都有 出击体验:陪浴,帮忙擦干,穿制服丝袜,然后从后面开始服务,过水,真🐲,正面亲,服务细致,值得体验,后续有机会还会再来 优点缺点:温柔服务型 推荐程度:9分 联系方式:@PAOPAOTVT 1,需要狼友提交报告 2,需要预约记录 3,需要付款记录,线上支付不需要拍照
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:牛马123 上课时间:4月19日 老师花名:#泡泡 位置坐标:#龙华区 上课花费:1500 颜值身材:10 服务内容:莞式服务一条龙 刚回来海口,就筛选老师,哈哈哈,无意中在列表看到泡泡,有点晚怕没位置,嘻嘻,看到回复可以,也离不远,就冲了过去,进门看到身材比例很好,进门后坐沙发上,泡泡很主动,两人腻歪起来,那腿够好,皮肤滑滑的,一起洗澡🛀,完事躺床上享受泡泡的服务,从耳边响起,到脸颊,到全身,无一幸免😂🤣,泡泡的口技了得,然后带上小伞,女上冲刺,泡泡在上面摇,我在下面享受,轻轻拍打她的屁股,嘴上说着驾、驾🙈,对,就是这速度,泡泡真是骚浪,后面,在她的强攻下,我败下阵来,洗澡🛀,后面就躺在床上,聊天,1/20分钟后,她开始对我背面进攻,那莞式服务,给我整得服服帖帖,后面到我开始后入在到传教士,真的爽,爱❤️得她累瘫,哈哈哈!后面出水完后,各自趟…
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:splonxa 上课时间:4.18 老师花名:#泡泡 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:165.C御姐天菜 服务内容:课表一致 出击体验:约了泡泡老师几个小时总算约上,果然莞式服务名不虚传,服务非常到位,皮肤也很光滑,全程无尬点,情绪价值很到位,属于温柔体贴型,强烈推荐 优点缺点:完美 推荐程度:100 联系方式:@PAOPAOTVT 1,需要狼友提交报告 2,需要预约记录 3,需要付款记录,线上支付不需要拍照
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:Lancelot 上课时间:26.4.17 老师花名:泡泡 位置坐标:融创 上课花费:8p 颜值身材:老师频道照片瘦脸减一点,身材很润~ 服务内容:课表里的都有 出击体验:早早在周周的频道里看到老师要来,看起来像是服务型的老师,便决定要来看一下是怎么个事儿。老师在联系上课的时候感觉性格很好,情绪价值提供的很足的老师。遥控进门,老师的身材看着就嗯…很润,恰到好处的肉感(绝对不胖),眼看着特别像邻居家人妻的调调~小寒暄了一下开始进入流程。服务虽然没有过水,但是上到下亲的很仔细,舔🥚力度恰到好处,无齿感,给好评。123过程不表,声音很好听,老师的身材后入,视觉冲击力拉满,手感拍起来也极佳,润~下次试试双。 优点缺点:服务不错,女友感的情绪价值给的包够,要是有🐍就更好了,当然不能强求。 推荐程度:8.5 联系方式: 1,需要狼友提交报告 2,需要预约记录 3,需要付…
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:Wendy 上课时间:4.16 老师花名:#泡泡 位置坐标:#龙华 上课花费:800 颜值身材:10 服务内容:优秀 出击体验:老师比较健谈 开始害怕比较尴尬 但很快打开话题 整体都比较自然 ,洗澡时水中萧还有很多小把戏,然后到床上就可挑选战服了,老师水比较多 配合程度高 服务态度很好 下次有机会再来 优点缺点:大 翘 湿 推荐程度:10 联系方式: 1,需要狼友提交报告 2,需要预约记录 3,需要付款记录,线上支付不需要拍照
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:柒楽 上课时间: 老师花名:#泡泡#周周 位置坐标:# 上课花费:3000pp 颜值身材:人照一致,各有各的风情 服务内容:海口双飞必吃榜!!!! 出击体验:进群这段时间,默默潜水,观看群内各个大佬互动,结果发现了宝藏女孩周周,但是当时进入课群时已经晚了一步,周周已经休假出门玩去了,只能遗憾退场。再到后边惊喜发现周周回归,还带回了小姐妹泡泡,这又让我升起了cj的冲动,再后来的课表评价中意外得知泡泡和周周竟然可以双飞,果断预约时间交下定金,出发 在打达上课地点后,一到楼上发现有个漂亮妹妹站在门口,确认过眼神,这么漂亮的萌妹一定是我要找的老师无疑,进门一看门后还躲着一个极品御姐泡泡,我去了这颜值,两人站在一起直接让我色心大起,果断交钱,在泡泡的服侍下脱下衣服,带着两个漂亮妹妹进了浴室,没想到刚进浴室立马就进入状态,前有周周搔首弄姿,后有泡泡上下其手,说实话古代的…
出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:匿 上课时间:4月13 老师花名:泡泡 位置坐标:龙华 上课花费:800p 颜值身材:胸罩c,翘臀,165左右 服务内容:第一个出击,该有的都有,虽然身材没有周周那么好,但是我喜欢这张脸,又骚,是和周周不一样的体验,800的另一种天花板,会返食 出击体验:可惜开课太晚了,不然可以和周周一起双飞 优点缺点:无缺 推荐程度:9 联系方式: 1,需要狼友提交报告 2,需要预约记录 3,需要付款记录,线上支付不需要拍照
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @PaoPaovi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“泡泡的朋友圈🫧” (@PaoPaovi), 189 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PaoPaovi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.