PaoloG "Only Degen/Gamble Call"๐ pinned ยซThe thing that makes me a bit sad about this group is seeing that almost all of you are afraid to buy into a project like $ROKHA, which has enormous potential. But then, when the real big candles appear and it performs like SAGENT, make sure you don't complain.ยป

Channel
PaoloG "Only Degen/Gamble Call"๐
@PaoloGDegenCall
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
907subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002020534968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PaoloGDegenCall |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PaoloGDegenCall |
Topic
Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 907 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 910 | +25 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 885 | -1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 886 | +9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 877 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 877 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
196 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 102 | 52.0% | |
| ๐ฅ | 32 | 16.3% | |
| ๐ | 24 | 12.2% | |
| ๐ฏ | 17 | 8.67% | |
| ๐ | 10 | 5.10% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 2.55% | |
| ๐ค | 3 | 1.53% | |
| ๐ฆ | 3 | 1.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The thing that makes me a bit sad about this group is seeing that almost all of you are afraid to buy into a project like $ROKHA, which has enormous potential. But then, when the real big candles appear and it performs like SAGENT, make sure you don't complain.
โค10๐2๐ฅ2
Itโs been a while since I posted about $ROKHA, but Iโm holding my entire bag for the long term. As you well know, itโs one of the micro-cap projects Iโm betting on most heavily going forward. If you follow me on FOMO, you know Iโm holding everything without issue; Iโm certain that sooner or later it will follow the same path as SAGENT, and those who aren't positioned will have major regrets. All I can tell you is โฆ
๐7โค4
I told you, $CREO dip are just for buying 1,2M Mcap for $CREO is an absolute GIFT ๐ now In some months you ll understand the reasons ps. In full bullrun a project like $CREO can easy reach 120M MCap (and also more in my opinion).. that's x100 from here and $CREO will reach the old ATH
โค8๐ฅ3๐ฏ2
https://x.com/Paul250889/status/2099485617503535136?s=20
โค9๐2๐ฏ2
https://x.com/marxmeterian/status/2099448740884996535?s=46 Support Marx new tweet! ๐ฅ ๐ซก CREO run will be INSANE
โค5๐2๐ฅ2
Smash fam!! $CREO ๐ฎ
โค9๐ฏ3๐ฅ2
https://x.com/paul250889/status/2098780234879299899?s=46
โค9๐3๐ฏ3
For the 17 people who didn't buy now is the right moment $CREO dips are for buying REMEMBER ๐ค
๐7๐3๐ฆ3โค2
PaoloG "Only Degen/Gamble Call"๐ pinned ยซPoll: Did you buy $CREO? I consider this a long-term play.ยป
Poll: Did you buy $CREO? I consider this a long-term play.
- YES ๐ฎ๐51%
- NOT ๐51%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
PaoloG "Only Degen/Gamble Call"๐ pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PaoloGDegenCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Poll: Did you buy $CREO? I consider this a long-term play.
- YES ๐ฎ๐51%
- NOT ๐51%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 14 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@inside_calls ยท 25,040
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 14 September 2026
@dippy_calls ยท 24,381
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here โ alongside 82 others โ read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โPaoloG "Only Degen/Gamble Call"๐โ (@PaoloGDegenCall), 907 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PaoloGDegenCall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.