Channel
@Papa_Grisha_think
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001458770348 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Papa_Grisha_think |
| Created | 22 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Papa_Grisha_think |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 76 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 75 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 74 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 74 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 10 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
99 reactions across 14 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 20 | 20.2% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 19.2% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 10.1% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.07% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 6.06% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.04% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 4.04% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.01% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.01% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| 6 further kinds | 6 | 6.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2023 to 2 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Антикризис по-дубайски Одна из самых престижных авиакомпаний мира (ну в Евразии уж точно) — Emirates — вчера решила подарить мне и, вероятно, другим своим пассажирам по 9000 миль для полетов. Не пол года назад, и даже не месяц назад. А вчера, когда в Дубай прилетели первые в их жизни беспилотники, а небо экстренно «закрыли». Спасибо, но пожалуй откажусь от таких щедрых предложений 😅
💊2💯2👀1😁1
Февраль давно стал довольно напряженным временем года. А тут еще и ретроградный Меркурий наложился просто 🙄
💯1🤔1🤪1
Смешные люди — пытаются фотками северного сияния перебить истинное назначение «третьего сентября» 😅
😁5💯2
Это всё, что вам надо знать о «трезвых политологах» и «экспертах» 😉 АЮ удачи на выборах, всех победим ✊ https://t.me/Drunkenpolitolog/15487 https://t.me/Drunkenpolitolog/16047
✍1💯1🔥1🤝1🤣1😁1
Какой был план встречи в овальном кабинете сегодня?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🌚1🗿1🤔1
А вдруг Пригожин с 23 августа был все время в Палестине? 🫣
👍2💯2😁2😱2❤1🔥1
Считаю, что обязательно должна быть возможность поставить «антибуст-голос» каналам. Чтобы это была настоящая избирательная компания за право постить сторисы в телеге)
💯4😁1
Ну что, как вам денек?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🥴2🤯1
Да-да, Олег Викторович, вы там главное сами на себя не выйдите, по классике таких расследований)
😁6👍5🔥3🤣3🌚2👏2💯2🌭1
Ой, у ребят с @online47news слетела накрутка просмотров. Вдруг стало понятно, что их читает 200 человек из 6381 «подписчиков». Наверное обидно, если за нее конечно все еще проплачено. У @lentv24 дела намного лучше, там целых 450 просмотров из 8951 «подписчика». Оба канала получается еле-еле дотягивают до 3-5% своей аудитории. Хотя если твоя аудитория это боты, то все ок 😉 Интересно, а губернатор Ленобласти Алекса…
🔥2🤣2😁2😢2👏1🤔1
Сегодня вечером столько постов про Гаагу и Путина, что хочется обязательно кое-что напомнить об их судействе
💯3👀1🫡1😁1
6 дата массированных ракетных ударов по инфраструктурным объектам на Украине случилась сегодня, 9 марта С самого утра фиксируются прилеты в Волынской, Черниговской, Кировоградской, Сумской, Киевской, Харьковской, Днепропетровской, Житомирской и Одесской областях. Также взрывы слышны в Ивано-Франковской, Тернопольской областях, Кривом Роге, Днепропетровске и пригороде Киева. Кто-то уже начал искать закономерности в …
👍2💩2👌1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Papa_Grisha_think. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой был план встречи в овальном кабинете сегодня?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ну что, как вам денек?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2023 to 2 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PapaGrisha” (@Papa_Grisha_think), 76 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Papa_Grisha_think.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.