Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PTC | پارس‌ترید

Channel

PTC | پارس‌ترید

@ParsTradeCommunity

Not marked by Telegram, checked 11 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,983subscribers

+15,827 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002216477329
TypeChannel
Username@ParsTradeCommunity
DescriptionOfficial PTC Channel™ 🔥 ParsTrade.pro 🌱 @PTCsup Same market, better trader ما باور داریم، میتونیم سطح کامیونیتی ترید ایران رو متحول کنیم.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ParsTradeCommunity

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4,74023,97214,35610 August 2026 — 5,156 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,154 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,116 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,103 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,089 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,065 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,045 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,026 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,019 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,996 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,984 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,955 subscribers25 September 2026 — 4,740 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,576 subscribers10 October 2026 — 10,379 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,468 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,819 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,110 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,313 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,499 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,754 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,950 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,295 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,752 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,137 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,369 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,032 subscribers26 October 2026 — 19,810 subscribers27 October 2026 — 20,919 subscribers28 October 2026 — 22,125 subscribers29 October 2026 — 23,972 subscribers30 October 2026 — 23,380 subscribers31 October 2026 — 22,813 subscribers1 November 2026 — 22,326 subscribers2 November 2026 — 22,097 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,675 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,426 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,231 subscribers6 November 2026 — 20,983 subscribers20,98310 August 20266 November 2026
39 measurements spanning 87 days, net +15,827. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,855–26,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:5720,983-248
5 Nov 2026, 09:2821,231-195
4 Nov 2026, 11:4621,426-249
3 Nov 2026, 14:1021,675-422
2 Nov 2026, 11:2922,097-229
1 Nov 2026, 13:2922,326-487
31 Oct 2026, 12:4622,813-567
30 Oct 2026, 16:0823,380-592
29 Oct 2026, 12:3923,972+1,847
28 Oct 2026, 09:1922,125+1,206
27 Oct 2026, 09:4720,919+1,109
26 Oct 2026, 10:0019,810+1,778
25 Oct 2026, 07:2018,032+2,663
24 Oct 2026, 06:4715,369+1,232
23 Oct 2026, 09:3114,137+385
22 Oct 2026, 08:0913,752+457
21 Oct 2026, 00:0713,295+345
19 Oct 2026, 19:2712,950+196
18 Oct 2026, 20:5912,754+255
17 Oct 2026, 22:4012,499first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 20,983 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,390
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
28
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held53 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total67,023
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Videos
8
Links
22

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8448.0%
🔥3520.0%
👍2916.6%
🐳137.43%
🥰95.14%
👏21.14%
😁21.14%
⚡10.571%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (17.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 04:03 UTC95 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۴۰ از ۹۰ | جمع‌بندی فاز چهارم: Edge رو باید ثابت کرد، نه حس کرد این ۱۰ روز دیدیم Edge یعنی Expectancy مثبت و پایدار بعد از هزینه‌ها؛ ستاپ باید قابل نوشتن و قابل تست باشه؛ بک‌تست قوانین سخت‌گیرانه‌ای داره؛ بیش‌برازش می‌تونه یه استراتژی تصادفی رو عالی نشون بده؛ و نتیجه‌ی ۲۰ یا ۳۰ معامله تقریباً هیچی رو ثابت نمی‌کنه. مسیر به‌طور خلاصه: ۱) ستاپ رو دقیق بنویس. ۲) با احتساب هزینه‌ها بک‌تست کن. ۳) نتیجه رو با حجم نمو…

5 Nov 2026, 03:58 UTC181 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۹ از ۹۰ | رژیم بازار: چرا استراتژی خوبت یهو کار نمی‌کنه بازار همیشه یه‌جور رفتار نمی‌کنه. گاهی روند داره، گاهی رنج می‌زنه، گاهی آرومه و گاهی پرنوسان. به این حالت‌ها می‌گن رژیم بازار. مشکل اینجاست که خیلی از ستاپ‌ها فقط تو یه رژیم Edge دارن. ستاپ روندی تو بازار رنج ضرر پشت ضرر می‌ده، و ستاپ برگشتی تو یه روند قوی له می‌شه. تریدر هم معمولاً به‌جای اینکه رژیم رو ببینه، فکر می‌کنه «استراتژی خراب شده» و می‌ره سراغ …

4 Nov 2026, 03:38 UTC219 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۸ از ۹۰ | هزینه‌ها چطور Edge رو می‌خورن روز ۱۷ از هزینه‌ی پنهان اسپرد گفتیم. حالا ببینیم این هزینه چطور مستقیماً Expectancy رو کم می‌کنه. فرض کن استاپت ۱۰ پیپه و اسپرد و کمیسیون روی هم ۱ پیپ. یعنی هر معامله، چه برد چه باخت، ۰.۱R هزینه داره. اگه Expectancy سیستمت قبل از هزینه ۰.۲R باشه، بعد از هزینه نصف می‌شه. حالا فرض کن همین سیستم با استاپ ۳۰ پیپ هم همون نتیجه‌ها رو به R بده: هزینه‌ی هر معامله حدود ۰.۰۳R می…

3 Nov 2026, 03:51 UTC253 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۷ از ۹۰ | فوروارد تست؛ پل بین بک‌تست و حساب زنده بک‌تست مثبت شد؟ عالیه. ولی هنوز یه مرحله مونده: اجرای همون قوانین روی بازار زنده، با حساب دمو یا حجم خیلی کوچیک. چرا این مرحله لازمه: - تو بک‌تست، حتی اگه کندل‌ها رو یکی‌یکی جلو ببری، باز هم ته ذهنت می‌دونی بازار اون روزها چیکار کرده. تو بازار زنده نمی‌دونی. - اسلیپیج، تأخیر و اسپرد لحظه‌ای تو بک‌تست دقیق شبیه‌سازی نمی‌شن. - مهم‌تر از همه: تو بک‌تست هیچ ترسی وج…

2 Nov 2026, 03:35 UTC301 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۶ از ۹۰ | تحلیل تکنیکال از نگاه پژوهش‌های دانشگاهی سؤالی که زیاد پرسیده می‌شه: تحلیل تکنیکال واقعاً کار می‌کنه؟ جواب صادقانه اینه که پژوهش‌ها نتیجه‌ی یکدستی ندارن. Park و Irwin تو یه مرور جامع، ۹۵ مطالعه‌ی جدید رو بررسی کردن: ۵۶ مطالعه سودآوری گزارش کردن، ۲۰ مطالعه نتیجه‌ی منفی داشتن و ۱۹ مطالعه نتیجه‌ی مختلط. ولی خود نویسنده‌ها می‌گن سودها بیشتر مربوط به دوره‌ای تا اوایل دهه‌ی ۹۰ میلادی بوده، و ایرادهایی مثل…

1 Nov 2026, 03:45 UTC312 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۵ از ۹۰ | چند معامله کافیه تا بفهمی سیستمت کار می‌کنه؟ فرض کن ۲۰ معامله زدی و وین‌ریتت ۵۰ درصد شده. این عدد واقعاً چقدر قابل اعتماده؟ با یه محاسبه‌ی آماری ساده (بازه‌ی اطمینان ۹۵ درصد)، وین‌ریت واقعی تو ممکنه این‌قدر بالا و پایین باشه: - ۲۰ معامله: بین حدود ۲۸ تا ۷۲ درصد - ۵۰ معامله: بین حدود ۳۶ تا ۶۴ درصد - ۱۰۰ معامله: بین حدود ۴۰ تا ۶۰ درصد - ۳۰۰ معامله: بین حدود ۴۴ تا ۵۶ درصد یه آزمایش دیگه هم انجام دادیم:…

31 Oct 2026, 03:40 UTC387 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۴ از ۹۰ | دام بیش‌برازش: وقتی استراتژی گذشته رو حفظ می‌کنه، نه بازار رو یه پژوهش معروف (Sullivan، Timmermann و White) حدود ۷۸۰۰ قانون معاملاتی تکنیکال رو روی صد سال داده‌ی شاخص داوجونز آزمایش کرد. روی کل دوره‌ی تاریخی، بهترین قانون‌ها نتیجه‌ی معناداری داشتن. ولی تو دوره‌ی ۱۹۸۷ تا ۱۹۹۶، شواهد خیلی کمی پیدا شد که این قانون‌ها ارزش اقتصادی داشته باشن. درسش اینه: اگه به‌اندازه‌ی کافی قانون رو روی یه داده امتحان ک…

30 Oct 2026, 03:45 UTC480 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۳ از ۹۰ | بک‌تست درست چه شکلیه؟ بک‌تست یعنی اجرای قوانین ستاپت روی داده‌ی گذشته، طوری که انگار اون موقع داشتی معامله می‌کردی. سخت‌ترین بخشش همین «انگار»ـه، چون آینده‌ی اون نمودار رو قبلاً دیدی. اصول یه بک‌تست قابل اعتماد: - قوانین رو قبل از شروع بنویس و وسط کار عوضشون نکن. - نمودار رو کندل‌به‌کندل جلو ببر و کندل‌های بعدی رو نبین. - همه‌ی ستاپ‌ها رو ثبت کن، نه فقط اون‌هایی که «قشنگ» بودن. - اسپرد و کمیسیون رو …

29 Oct 2026, 03:48 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۲ از ۹۰ | از ایده تا قانون: ستاپت رو طوری بنویس که قابل تست باشه خیلی از ما یه ستاپ تو ذهنمون داریم، ولی اگه ازمون بخوان دقیق بنویسیمش، می‌بینیم پر از «بستگی داره»ـه. چیزی که نوشته نشده، قابل تست هم نیست. یه ستاپ قابل تست باید به این سؤال‌ها جواب بده: - چه بازار و چه تایم‌فریمی؟ - شرایط زمینه چیه؟ (مثلاً جهت تایم‌فریم بالا، روز ۱۳) - ماشه‌ی ورود دقیقاً چیه؟ - استاپ کجاست و چرا؟ - خروج با سود کجاست؟ - چه زمانی…

28 Oct 2026, 03:55 UTC≈4,540 viewsread 6 November 2026

🧠روز ۳۱ از ۹۰ | Edge دقیقاً یعنی چی؟ ا Edge (مزیت معاملاتی) یعنی یه روش مشخص که اگه صدها بار تکرارش کنی، بعد از کسر هزینه‌ها، به‌طور میانگین سود بده. سه بخش این تعریف مهمه: ۱) مشخص: اون‌قدر دقیق تعریف شده باشه که یه نفر دیگه هم بتونه دقیقاً همون رو اجرا کنه. «حس می‌کنم بالا می‌ره» Edge نیست. ۲) تکرارپذیر: نتیجه‌ی ۱۰ معامله چیزی رو ثابت نمی‌کنه؛ Edge تو تعداد زیاد معنا پیدا می‌کنه. ۳) بعد از هزینه‌ها: اسپرد، کمیسیون…

27 Oct 2026, 07:48 UTC≈5,320 viewsread 6 November 2026

👩‍🚀یک‌سوم راه رو اومدیم. از فردا قسمت اصلی شروع می‌شه. یه پژوهش روی داده‌های بورس برزیل، همه‌ی کسایی رو بررسی کرد که بیشتر از ۳۰۰ روز دی‌ترید کرده بودن. نتیجه: ۹۷ درصدشون ضرر کردن. قول نمی‌دیم تو جزو اون ۳ درصد باشی. هر کی این قول رو بهت بده، داره دروغ می‌گه. قول ما اینه: آخر این ۹۰ روز، دقیقاً می‌دونی اون ۹۷ نفر کجا باختن. پشت این سری چی هست؟ • ده‌ها پژوهش دانشگاهی و گزارش رسمی؛ از داده‌ی کامل بورس تایوان تا گزارش…

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @ParsTradeCommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Coinlocally | کوین لوکالی
@coin_locally · 214,185
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
تسهیلگری در زندگی
@gildaborojerdi · 28,761
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
اقتصاد و ارزدیجیتال با روزبه📊
@eco_roozbeh · 57,865
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 August 2026
هلدینگ نگین
@holding_negin · 101,972
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
آموزش‌های پورصمدی
@XCV3I · 19,385
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 October 2026
remix sina📌
@ghafarysinaa · 24,568
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PTC | پارس‌ترید” (@ParsTradeCommunity), 20,983 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ParsTradeCommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.