Sticker, posted without a caption
❤4
Signed imsanaz

Channel
@PartBandi_Halname
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
811subscribers
-61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002017488938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PartBandi_Halname |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PartBandi_Halname |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 811 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 828 | -37 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 865 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 870 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 870 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 872 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 94.8% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 5.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤4
Signed imsanaz
من پشت کنکوریم خوندم ولی یادم رفته ولی با نکات اخر شبا که میزاری از شکلا یه چیزایی یادم میاد مرسی ازت بیشتر اینجور نکات بزار
❤4🤝1
Signed imsanaz
خب خب و این شکل هم تموم شد. فردا شب ادامهی فصل2 رو داریم!
🤝3
Signed imsanaz
بخش ترشحی غده عرق در عمق پوست پیچ خوردست اما مجرای خروجیش نسبتاً مستقیم تر به سمت سطح میره
❤3
Signed imsanaz
غده عرق تو عمق پوست قرار دارده ولی مجرای اون تا سطح اپیدرم امتداد پیدا میکنه پس محل قرارگیری غده و محل خروج ترشح یکی نیست.
❤4
Signed imsanaz
پیاز مو تو بخش عمیق پوست قرار گرفته اما ساقه مو از تمام ضخامت اپیدرم عبور میکنه و از سطح پوست خارج میشه
❤4
Signed imsanaz
امیدوارم چیزایی که گفتم به درد همگی تون خورده باشه
❤4
Signed imsanaz
مویرگ ها تا نزدیکی مرز اپیدرم و درم بالا میان اما وارد اپیدرم نمیشن بنابراین هرچه سلول اپیدرم از درم دورتر باشه وابستگی بیشتری به انتشار مواد داره.
❤2
Signed imsanaz
مویرگ ها تو قسمت برجسته درم به اپیدرم نزدیک ترن بنابراین ضخامت اپیدرم در محل فرورفتگی ها و برجستگی های مرزی از نظر فاصله تا منبع مواد غذایی یکسان نیستن.
❤2
Signed imsanaz
در لایه اپیدرم رگ خونی وجود نداره درحالیکه در لایه درم و بافت چربی زیر پوست رگ های خونی به فراوانی وجود دارد
❤2
Signed imsanaz
در اطراف پیاز مو گیرنده حسی بدون پوشش پیوندی قرار داره و ماهیچه راست کنندهی مو
❤2
Signed imsanaz
گیرنده فشار عمقی و گیرنده درد از نظر سازش تقریباً نقطه مقابل همن: گیرنده فشار با ادامه دار شدن فشار خیلی سریع تر سازش میکنن اما گیرنده های درد سازش خیلی کمی دارن چون مغز باید تا وقتی آسیب وجود داره همچنان از خطر باخبر بمونه یعنی بدن عمداً کاری کرده که فشار مداوم کم اهمیت بشه ولی آسیب مداوم فراموش نشه
❤2
Signed imsanaz
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PartBandi_Halname. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پارت بندی | Study” (@PartBandi_Halname), 811 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PartBandi_Halname.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.