Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Paulo Kogos - Ocidente em Fúria

Channel

Paulo Kogos - Ocidente em Fúria

@PauloKogoss

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,227subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001270286309
TypeChannel
Username@PauloKogoss
Created3 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PauloKogoss

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,2274,2714,2496 August 2026 — 4,270 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,270 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,271 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,268 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,263 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,260 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,258 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,251 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,252 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,249 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,233 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,231 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,227 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,220–4,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 22:424,227-4
13 Sept 2026, 09:164,231-2
9 Sept 2026, 02:594,233-16
3 Sept 2026, 11:404,249-3
31 Aug 2026, 05:084,252+1
28 Aug 2026, 03:384,251-7
24 Aug 2026, 21:224,258-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:124,260-3
17 Aug 2026, 18:564,263-5
11 Aug 2026, 00:584,268-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:514,271+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:004,270no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:564,270first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 21 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏6328.8%
3516.0%
👍3013.7%
😁167.31%
🎉125.48%
💩104.57%
🔥94.11%
🕊62.74%
😎62.74%
52.28%
41.83%
💘41.83%
🗿41.83%
🙈41.83%
🙊41.83%
🏆31.37%
👎10.457%
🖕10.457%
🤩10.457%
🫡10.457%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC183 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Sem armamento civil não há defesa nacional — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/IuS-ZqcHBKk 45:02

85🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC338 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A atitude de Jeffrey Chiquini no Iron Talks foi irretocável — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/vFwS1FuIBAc 40:29

👍5🗿4💩2

28 Jul 2026, 01:40 UTC598 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Lula promove supra-melanciação da defesa nacional com perspectivas tenebrosas — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/UpwpjlqPkWg 15:33

👍111🎉1👏1

26 Jul 2026, 00:10 UTC621 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Rapida apologia da Legitima defesa mediante emprego de ardil — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/oznu7SSTaCE 1:57

82

21 Jul 2026, 23:25 UTC788 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Chimpanzés são infinitamente mais inteligentes que eleitores do Zema — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/p-yCsupyFjg 22:36

😁11👍4🙊4👎1🫡1

13 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC976 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Refutando o ateísmo do professor Stephen Kinsella — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/fEGfjTRx6qM 20:40

😁43👍1

10 Jul 2026, 23:02 UTC925 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

PT aprova cota pra bandido — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/IGFeeKp81zY 33:46

👏5💘2

8 Jul 2026, 00:15 UTC936 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Conheçam Miguel Almeida, o primeiro libertário de Portugal — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/As9CbszRomA 10:31

👏7🤩1

2 Jul 2026, 02:45 UTC≈1,060 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Pra melhorar é preciso primeiro sobreviver — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/1n3wKf1rPVA 2:55

👍81🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 23:09 UTC≈1,080 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hans Hoppe ao vivo!!! — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/yZd-Wg7cAjI 2:20

🎉7🏆3

27 Jun 2026, 23:09 UTC901 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Feliz aniversário, Rothbard — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/TLeASW_LWE4 13:35

🎉41

26 Jun 2026, 14:35 UTC891 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Dona Ferreirinha, heroína empresarial do Porto — Ocidente em Fúria - com Paulo Kogos https://youtu.be/uBvetN0zmic 5:22

😎62

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @PauloKogoss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nikolas Ferreira
@nikolasferreira · 192,070
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Bia Kicis Oficial
@biakicisoficial · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Padre Paulo Ricardo
@padrepauloricardo · 61,818
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
Revista Oeste
@revistaoesteoficial · 31,610
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
Brasil Paralelo
@brasilparalelooficial · 57,332
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Te Atualizei Oficial
@canalteatualizei · 30,692
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Hoje no Mundo Militar - Canal
@hojeno_mundomilitar · 90,212
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Gustavo Gayer
@gusgayer · 30,810
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Carla Zambelli
@carlazambellioficial · 53,374
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
Eduardo Bolsonaro 🇧🇷
@depeduardobolsonaro · 61,220
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
Prof. Danuzio Neto - OSINT, Geopolítica e Atualidades (Intel BR - News)
@profdanuzioneto · 121,313
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
CARLOS BOLSONARO
@bolsonarocarlos · 109,611
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Paulo Kogos - Ocidente em Fúria” (@PauloKogoss), 4,227 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PauloKogoss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.