Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Penipu clone 8968780003

Channel

Penipu clone 8968780003

@Penipuclone8968780003

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004345016675
TypeChannel
Username@Penipuclone8968780003
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 October 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Penipuclone8968780003

Growth

311 October 2026 — 3 subscribers13 October 2026 — 3 subscribers11 October 202613 October 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 23:473no change
11 Oct 2026, 07:223first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1526.7%
avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.8
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held16 (11 October 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total687
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Oct 2026, 06:24 UTC27 viewsread 11 October 2026

dia sekarang akunnya prem, pake emoji prem spoiler di samping namanya, jadi buat kalian HATI HATI‼️

11 Oct 2026, 05:49 UTC41 viewsread 11 October 2026

kalian bisa langsung blok atau sv penipu, admin ku lagi bikin laporan juga

11 Oct 2026, 05:44 UTC49 viewsread 11 October 2026

warning ya buat semuanya, jangan lupa literasi & croschek apapun itu, jangan gampang percaya biar gada korban lagi.

11 Oct 2026, 05:43 UTC50 viewsread 11 October 2026
Photo

HFW PENIPU CLONE AKUN 🆔 ID: 8968780003 👱 Nama: Malven 🌐 Username: @isipah tg://openmessage?user_id=8968780003 NODAN PENIPU : 083173789648 CLONE : @ISIPAH 8968780003 ASLI : @ISIAPAH 8480172616

11 Oct 2026, 05:37 UTC49 viewsread 11 October 2026

hai aku malven asli, akun ini emang aku baru pindahin kemaren buat di jadiin admin di ress ku, karna akun sebelumnya udah jarang aktif jadi aku mutusin buat pindah akun, ress ku emang sebelumnya banyak clone in dari admin admin ku juga di clone sama penipu, emang lagi sial aja lagi lengah makanya kena, aku dan admin ku sama sama korban, jadi aku bakal tetep ganti uang admin ku yang kena sama si cloning itu

11 Oct 2026, 05:35 UTC47 viewsread 11 October 2026

aku pertegas ya, dia ini cloning. mungkin kedepannya juga bakal nge clone orang lagi. jadi jangan salah orang ya, jangan kira yang a.n Malven dan pp nya sama kayak dia itu penipunya

11 Oct 2026, 05:33 UTC47 viewsread 11 October 2026

kalian viralin aja ya, kayanya ini metode penipuan baru, amit amit ya kalian kena juga, padahal sesama admin, nge-clone admin yang di tipu admin juga

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Penipuclone8968780003. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Penipu clone 8968780003” (@Penipuclone8968780003), 3 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Penipuclone8968780003.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.