نفت چی میشه؟ ممکنه تا ۸۰ هم بیاد پایین در میان مدت و بعد احتمالا تا ۱۵۰ بالا میره به نظرم. در پسِ این برآورد نفت، شما به برآورد من از جنگ پی ببرید.
❤18👍8👎4
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani

Channel
@PeperoniAnalysis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,233subscribers
-242 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001200066313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PeperoniAnalysis |
| Description | ﷽ محمدرضا فلفلانی کارشناس ارشد مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه خوارزمی مشاور سرمایهگذاری تحلیلگر سیستمهای اقتصادی اجتماعی مدیرعامل خانه همافزایی انرژی و آب عضو کمیسیونهای انرژی و آب اتاق بازرگانی Felfelani.ir |
| Created | 10 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PeperoniAnalysis |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 7,233 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:00 | 7,240 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 7,245 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 7,249 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 7,257 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 7,267 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 7,276 | -15 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 7,291 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 7,298 | -13 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 01:16 | 7,311 | +31 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 7,280 | -26 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 7,306 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 7,312 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 7,320 | -18 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:14 | 7,338 | -22 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:04 | 7,360 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 7,368 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 7,386 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 7,391 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 7,397 | first reading |
71 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (7 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 37,113 |
| Reactions total | 721 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 01:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,792 reactions across 69 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 889 | 49.6% | |
| 👍 | 441 | 24.6% | |
| 👏 | 136 | 7.59% | |
| 👎 | 120 | 6.70% | |
| 😁 | 73 | 4.07% | |
| 🤯 | 38 | 2.12% | |
| 😢 | 35 | 1.95% | |
| 🤔 | 29 | 1.62% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 0.837% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 0.614% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,894 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (9.68%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نفت چی میشه؟ ممکنه تا ۸۰ هم بیاد پایین در میان مدت و بعد احتمالا تا ۱۵۰ بالا میره به نظرم. در پسِ این برآورد نفت، شما به برآورد من از جنگ پی ببرید.
❤18👍8👎4
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
این تحلیلم از طلا در سال ۲۰۱۹ خیلی دقیق بود، مسیر حرکت دقیقا همینی بود که کشیدم. روی انس ۱۲۰۰ دلاری نوشتم طلا ارزشمند است. و روند از همانجا آغاز شد. @PeperoniAnalysis
❤9👍4
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
یا این تحلیلم از طلای جهانی در سال ۲۰۱۹ که دقیقا درست عمل کرد. یادش بخیر پیشکسوت شدیم رفت.
👍15❤10😁1
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
نمیدونم چی شد این تحلیلم در سال ۹۷ در وبسایت رهاورد در نظرم زنده شد. من از سال ۹۵ تا امروز روی نماد واتی در حال نوسانگیری هستم. این نماد در اغلب اوقات رفتار کاملا تکنیکالی داره. @PeperoniAnalysis
❤21👍7
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
👆 خیلی کم پیش میاد توصیه به خرید و فروش داشته باشم اما اگر گاهی مانند، نور، توضیحاتی ارائه میدم احتمالا پشتش عدم قطعیتِ کمتری هست.
❤26
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
نتیجه انتخابات کنگره و سنا نشون میده نارضایتی از ترامپ، بهخصوص بهخاطر تورم و فشار اقتصادی، جدی شده. اگر دموکراتها کنترل هر دو مجلس رو در دست بگیرن که دارن میگیرن، کار ترامپ برای پیشبرد برنامههاش سختتر میشه؛ هرچند همچنان حق وتو داره و این خیلی مهمه. این موضوع برای ما هم تا حدی مهمه؛ چون ادامه یا تشدید جنگ میتونه هزینه سیاسی و اقتصادی بیشتری برای ترامپ در داخل آمریکا ایجاد کنه. به نظرم یکی از پیامهای این انتخا…
👍10❤3
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
نشانی صفحههای ما: اینستاگرام: Https://instagram.com/felfelani.ir تلگرام: https://t.me/PeperoniAnalysis یوتیوب: https://youtube.com/@felfelani?si=Y0QFpS91Ek0GCXEn بله: https://ble.ir/felfelanism آپارات: https://www.aparat.com/Felfelani.ir وبسایت: Felfelani.ir سامانه تحلیلی و پایش بازارها: WatchBot.ir
❤5
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
فضای مذاکرات
😁12❤3
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
منطق اقتصادی این حرف نادرست نیست. قیمت، سیگنال مهمی برای سرمایهگذاری و افزایش عرضه است؛ نمیتوان با سرکوب قیمتها، واقعیتهای اقتصادی را تغییر داد. کاش پوپولیستهای اقتصاد ما هم کمی از این نگاه یاد میگرفتند و بهجای اینکه با پاک کردن صورتمسئله و قیمتگذاری دستوری و توزیع رانت، اجازه دهند سازوکارهای اقتصادی برای حل ناترازیها عمل کنند.
👍9❤6
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
وزیر انرژی ایالات متحده، کریس رایت: قیمتها بالاست. بهترین راه برای مقابله با قیمتهای بالا، افزایش قیمتها است. این امر باعث افزایش عرضه میشود. و به همین دلیل، عرضه در حال افزایش است ☑️ @persiannbloomberg بلومبرگ فارسی✔️
🤔5❤1
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
مجلسِ عوام، به وضوح در انتصابات دخالت میکند و حرفهای پوپولیستی میزند.
👍18
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
چقدر اخبار مذاکرات زیاد شد. ایکاش کمتر زیاد میشد که بشه خوشبین بود.
❤30🤔5
Signed Mohammad Reza Felfelani
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @PeperoniAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقتصاد و بازار” (@PeperoniAnalysis), 7,233 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PeperoniAnalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.