Channel
@PeterBernegger
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,500subscribers
-79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001886380628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PeterBernegger |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PeterBernegger |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 2,500 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 2,506 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 2,511 | -8 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 2,519 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 2,523 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 2,528 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 2,529 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 2,538 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 2,542 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 2,552 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 2,558 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 2,564 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 2,576 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 2,579 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,354 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 387 | 28.6% | |
| 💯 | 309 | 22.8% | |
| ❤ | 194 | 14.3% | |
| 🙏 | 163 | 12.0% | |
| 👍 | 105 | 7.75% | |
| 🤬 | 68 | 5.02% | |
| 👀 | 51 | 3.77% | |
| 😁 | 31 | 2.29% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 1.70% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 0.812% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.295% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.222% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.148% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.148% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Help Tina Peters get back on her feet: Telethon tomorrow Sunday June 14, 2026. 9am -9pm CST. Donate at her website for her personal needs or legal defense fund (scroll down once you get on the site). TinaPeters.us ~ Peter Bernegger
❤47🙏31🔥2
Peru had 90% of its 27 million ballots counted the same day of their recent election - by hand. The City of Milwaukee took all day Nov 3rd 2020 into Nov 4th until 3:06am to count 269,500 absentee mail-in ballots. And they had high speed scanners. Peru: ~3,000,000 per hour Milwaukee: ~13,475 ballots per hour And, you can see with your own eyes the disaster (election fraud) happening in California now taking days/…
💯79❤28👍12🔥7👀6👏4
The way to stop election fraud is to criminally prosecute the bad actors stealing our elections. ~ Peter Bernegger
💯89🔥67👍14❤10🫡2👀1👏1
NEW REPORT: Wisconsin's official voter database now credits 3,379,178 people with voting in Nov 2020. Ballots cast: 3,308,331. 70,847 MORE voters than ballots. The election was decided by 20,682. Look on page 2 of how the total ballots cast number keeps changing over time, all for the SAME exact election!! Five page report at link, first 2 pages shown below. https://issuu.com/electionwatch/docs/hufton_files_repo…
🔥61👀21❤5👍3🤬2
"Milwaukee Council OKs election legal counsel in wake of FBI inquiry" "Is the Milwaukee City Attorney's Office gearing up for a possible legal storm tied to the 2020 election? The answer: most likely." "With no public discussion, the city's Common Council unanimously voted June 2 in favor of authorizing the City Attorney to hire outside counsel for election-related needs." Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. What…
😁31🙏30💯12🔥7👏5👀3❤2
Texas Sec. of State Jane Nelson learned of my federal lawsuit against her on May 28th. Two days ago she resigned. I posted about this March 1st. ~ Peter Bernegger
❤56👍32⚡11👏7👀1
Harry Wait was just sentenced: no jail time! This is great news as Harry exposed the corrupt Wisconsin Election Commission for THEM committing election fraud. For the corrupt Wisconsin Election Commission knowingly exposing each registered voter in Wisconsin - still till this day - of your voter accounts being able to be accessed on the Wisconsin Election Commission website MyVote. Like I'm doing here for Don Mil…
🔥62👍14💯12❤10🙏8👏3👀2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
Most people have no idea what President Trump’s new election-mail Executive Order USPS rule actually does. 1. Plain English: it creates a chain-of-custody system for mail ballot envelopes in federal elections. 2. Not the vote, the envelope. 3. Under the proposed USPS rule, states using mail-in or absentee ballots for federal elections would have to use standardized ballot envelopes: -Official Election Mail logo …
🙏58❤24👍14🔥10👏2💯1
Foreign workers have received 52% of American jobs since 2007. The Fed. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) confirm this: foreigners accounted for 56% of labor force growth from 2007 to early 2025. "9 of every 10 new American jobs since pre-COVID went to someone born outside the country." See the BLS image backing this statement. "Foreign-born employment is growing 42x faster than native-born since 2019. FORTY-TWO T…
💯80🤬21🔥4😱4🤯2🙏2❤1👀1
Part 2 of 2: Wisconsin does not report total ballots cast for any election until 6 months afterwards!! My post above shows the total ballots cast for the same election (Nov. 3rd, 2020) keeps changing every time we purchase a new voter registration list from the Wis. Election Commission. In fact, the state's data shows total ballots cast changes for every election in Wisconsin! By big numbers also! See my April 2…
🤬35🔥9👀3❤1👎1🤮1
The total ballots cast in a completed election should not keep changing. The Wisconsin Election Commission reported 3,308,331 ballots cast for the Nov. 2020 election to the federal EAC. But WEC’s own snapshots over time show totals swinging from -36,051 to +70,847 from that official number. It should be a straight line in the chart. Same election. Different totals. Repeatedly. Why? Thank you to Steve Hufton for d…
🔥73👀8👍5🙏5❤1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @PeterBernegger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Peter Bernegger” (@PeterBernegger), 2,500 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PeterBernegger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.