Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Peter Hahne ꙳

Channel

Peter Hahne ꙳

@PeterHah_nee

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63,131subscribers

+47,210 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003792361111
TypeChannel
Username@PeterHah_nee
DescriptionPeter Hahne Offizieller Kanal für YouTube-Videos, Anlagetipps, Kontoverwaltung.
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PeterHah_nee

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

21.3 average views per post against 63,131 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.034%. Across the 24,272 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,997 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.63% and 15.1%, with a median of 6.82%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured624 of 624 published in the window (624 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled13,285
Mature posts only0.054% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers63,131 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb31623 · 24,272 channels · p10 0.799% · p25 2.63% · p50 6.82% · p75 15.1% · p90 27.6%
Position in cohort0.494th percentile · 1/200 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.046% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageGerman · 99.7% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,68866,07840,8836 August 2026 — 15,921 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,895 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,864 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,814 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,754 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,740 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,688 subscribers13 August 2026 — 66,078 subscribers14 August 2026 — 66,038 subscribers16 August 2026 — 65,986 subscribers17 August 2026 — 65,903 subscribers18 August 2026 — 65,838 subscribers19 August 2026 — 65,809 subscribers20 August 2026 — 65,784 subscribers21 August 2026 — 65,730 subscribers23 August 2026 — 65,666 subscribers24 August 2026 — 65,600 subscribers25 August 2026 — 65,549 subscribers26 August 2026 — 65,505 subscribers28 August 2026 — 65,500 subscribers29 August 2026 — 65,465 subscribers30 August 2026 — 65,405 subscribers31 August 2026 — 65,355 subscribers1 September 2026 — 65,323 subscribers2 September 2026 — 65,288 subscribers3 September 2026 — 64,997 subscribers5 September 2026 — 64,504 subscribers8 September 2026 — 63,685 subscribers11 September 2026 — 63,556 subscribers13 September 2026 — 63,451 subscribers14 September 2026 — 63,328 subscribers16 September 2026 — 63,199 subscribers19 September 2026 — 63,131 subscribers63,1316 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +47,210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,130–73,637 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:5463,131-68
16 Sept 2026, 17:5863,199-129
14 Sept 2026, 22:4063,328-123
13 Sept 2026, 10:4163,451-105
11 Sept 2026, 13:3863,556-129
8 Sept 2026, 20:3763,685-819
5 Sept 2026, 13:5964,504-493
3 Sept 2026, 15:3764,997-291
2 Sept 2026, 10:2365,288-35
1 Sept 2026, 08:5765,323-32
31 Aug 2026, 05:2765,355-50
30 Aug 2026, 03:1665,405-60
29 Aug 2026, 04:3365,465-35
28 Aug 2026, 02:1265,500-5
26 Aug 2026, 22:5865,505-44
25 Aug 2026, 21:3465,549-51
24 Aug 2026, 18:5965,600-66
23 Aug 2026, 00:5765,666-64
21 Aug 2026, 16:3665,730-54
20 Aug 2026, 16:3865,784first reading

Engagement

973 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.033%
avg views ÷ 63,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.8
640 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
640
of 973 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 640 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held973 (6 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total13,309
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 02:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,580
Videos
633
Links
617

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 30m
Average length
1m 27s

Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 34 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
717.5%
👍615.0%
👎37.50%
💯37.50%
😁37.50%
25.00%
👻25.00%
🔥25.00%
🤬25.00%
🎉12.50%
👌12.50%
💋12.50%
😱12.50%
🙏12.50%
🤗12.50%
🤝12.50%
🤣12.50%
🤩12.50%
🤯12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 973 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 973 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 00:35 UTC4 viewsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🛢🇪🇺 Plötzlich hat die EU doch Ölhunger Macron bittet EU um dringende Lockerung der Kraftstoffstandards 👔 Frankreichs Präsident Emmanuel Macron hat sich an die Präsidentin der Europäischen Kommission, Ursula von der Leyen, mit der Bitte gewandt, die Umweltanforderungen an Kraftstoffe vorübergehend zu lockern. Zu Macrons Vorschlägen gehören: ▪️die Zulassung von Diesel mit höherem Schwefelgehalt; ▪️die Erhöhung des

23 Sept 2026, 00:35 UTC2 viewsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Bitcoin schießt über 86.000 US-Dollar: ETFs im Fokus Bitcoin erlebte am 21. September 2026 eine starke Rallye und stieg erstmals seit Januar über 86.000 US-Dollar. Dieser Schritt hat den Fokus der Anleger auf Spot-Bitcoin-ETFs erneuert, die eine Exponierung von Bitcoin bieten, ohne dass Anleger die Kryptowährung direkt halten müssen. Die jüngste Rallye ist besonders bemerkenswert, da Bitcoin während eines Großteils

23 Sept 2026, 00:32 UTC1 viewsread 23 September 2026

Tipp des Tages: 💯 Unterschätze nicht den Wert eines ruhigen, ganz normalen Tages. Nicht jeder Tag muss mit einer großen Leistung, einem aufregenden Ereignis oder einem bedeutenden Durchbruch verbunden sein. Manchmal ist ein friedlicher Tag, an dem du auf dich achtest, Wichtiges erledigst und die einfachen Momente genießt, ein guter Tag. Ein erfülltes Leben setzt sich aus alltäglichen Momenten zusammen, nicht nur a

23 Sept 2026, 00:31 UTC2 viewsread 23 September 2026
Photo

KI-Vogelgrippe: Die nächste Angstgeschichte für zentrale Kontrolle Bill Gates, die UNO und ehemalige US-Sicherheitsberater warnen vor einer von KI konstruierten Vogelgrippe, die Tiere und Menschen massenhaft treffen könnte. Das Szenario dient als Begründung, den Zugang zu leistungsfähigen KI-Modellen und Biomanufakturen streng zu beschränken. Gleichzeitig laufen bereits flächendeckende PCR-Tests in der Milchwirtsch

23 Sept 2026, 00:31 UTC1 viewsread 23 September 2026

💵 Zahlen lügen nicht. Auszahlungen lügen nicht. Beweise lügen nicht. Meine Investoren erhalten regelmäßig echte, auszahlbare Gewinne – keine Versprechen, sondern handfeste Ergebnisse, die auf disziplinierten Investment- und Trading-Strategien basieren. Egal, ob du neu am Markt bist oder erfahrener Trader – ich biete die nötige Orientierung und Klarheit, um sicher zu agieren. 📊 Entdecke, was mit der richtigen Strat

23 Sept 2026, 00:30 UTC1 viewsread 23 September 2026
Video

EGAL OB MERZ, SÖDER ODER WÜST, ES FEHLT DIE LÖSUNGSKOMPETENZ! Die Namen an der Spitze wechseln, doch die Probleme bleiben. Ob Friedrich Merz, Markus Söder oder Hendrik Wüst – entscheidend ist nicht, wer den Kanzlertitel trägt, sondern welche Politik tatsächlich gemacht wird. Beatrix von Storch bringt es auf den Punkt: „Es geht nicht darum, wie der Kanzler heißt, sondern was die Politik ist.“ Ohne echte Lösungskompe

23 Sept 2026, 00:29 UTC1 viewsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Bereit für den nächsten Schritt Ihrer Anlagestrategie? 📩 Schreiben Sie uns, um mehr über unseren Anlageansatz zu erfahren und wie strategische Investitionsmöglichkeiten Ihre finanziellen Ziele unterstützen können. 📱 Telegram: @PeterHahne_a ✅📥

Showing the 12 most recent of 973 posts we hold for @PeterHah_nee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Peter Hahne ꙳” (@PeterHah_nee), 63,131 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PeterHah_nee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.