Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐏𝐅𝐗 𝐒𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐏𝐄𝐑

Channel

𝐏𝐅𝐗 𝐒𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐏𝐄𝐑

@PfxScalper35

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

4,429subscribers

-135 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001247325620
TypeChannel
Username@PfxScalper35
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PfxScalper35

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4,4294,5644,496.52 September 2026 β€” 4,564 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 4,564 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 4,562 subscribers9 September 2026 β€” 4,563 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 4,541 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 4,551 subscribers25 September 2026 β€” 4,530 subscribers4 October 2026 β€” 4,521 subscribers10 October 2026 β€” 4,511 subscribers14 October 2026 β€” 4,489 subscribers17 October 2026 β€” 4,473 subscribers20 October 2026 β€” 4,463 subscribers24 October 2026 β€” 4,455 subscribers26 October 2026 β€” 4,448 subscribers29 October 2026 β€” 4,436 subscribers5 November 2026 β€” 4,429 subscribers2 September 20265 November 2026
16 measurements spanning 64 days, net -135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,409–4,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:394,429-7
29 Oct 2026, 14:164,436-12
26 Oct 2026, 16:474,448-7
24 Oct 2026, 01:104,455-8
20 Oct 2026, 16:364,463-10
17 Oct 2026, 11:204,473-16
14 Oct 2026, 11:074,489-22
10 Oct 2026, 16:394,511-10
4 Oct 2026, 19:204,521-9
25 Sept 2026, 13:194,530-21
16 Sept 2026, 19:414,551+10
13 Sept 2026, 07:364,541-22
9 Sept 2026, 07:184,563+1
3 Sept 2026, 14:164,562-2
2 Sept 2026, 23:244,564no change
2 Sept 2026, 16:014,564first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β€” we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⚜️Gold Platinum Trader⚜️
@goldplatinum_trader Β· 34,406
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 50 here β€” alongside 49 others β€” read 2 September 2026
SYNTHETICX SIGNALS
@SyntheticxOfficial Β· 32,039
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here β€” alongside 79 others β€” read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œππ…π— 𝐒𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐏𝐄𝐑” (@PfxScalper35), 4,429 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PfxScalper35.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.