Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Философия кино

Channel

Философия кино

@PhilosophyOfCinema

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,702subscribers

-287 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002106545903
TypeChannel
Username@PhilosophyOfCinema
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PhilosophyOfCinema

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,7028,9898,845.57 August 2026 — 8,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,989 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,985 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,963 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,935 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,919 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,890 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,869 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,853 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,828 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,802 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,771 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,750 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,727 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,702 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,659–9,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:368,702-25
15 Sept 2026, 02:578,727-23
11 Sept 2026, 14:388,750-21
7 Sept 2026, 06:168,771-31
2 Sept 2026, 16:268,802-26
30 Aug 2026, 17:088,828-25
27 Aug 2026, 12:258,853-16
24 Aug 2026, 09:238,869-21
20 Aug 2026, 18:058,890-29
17 Aug 2026, 21:338,919-16
14 Aug 2026, 17:378,935-28
10 Aug 2026, 22:258,963-22
8 Aug 2026, 04:548,985-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:168,989no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:088,989first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3029.4%
2726.5%
🔥2120.6%
❤‍🔥1413.7%
💯65.88%
👏43.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC302 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @existenz_philosophiePhoto

Existenzphilosophie Любое дающее из самого первоисточника созерцание есть правовой источник познания, и все, что предлагается нам в "интуиции" из самого первоисточника (так сказать, в своей настоящей живой действительности), нужно принимать таким, каким оно себя дает, но и только в тех рамках, в каких оно себя дает. Эдмунд Гуссерль Э. Гуссерль. Идеи к чистой феноменологии и феноменологической философии. Книга перв

👍42

7 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC544 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @existenz_philosophiePhoto

Existenzphilosophie Если философ не человек, он уж тем более не философ; он всего-навсего педант, то есть жалкое подобие человека. Развитие любой науки – химии, физики, геометрии, филологии – может быть делом той или иной специализации, хотя даже здесь это возможно в ограниченных и очень узких рамках. Но философия, как и поэзия, либо создаётся целостным единством всех человеческих сил, либо, в противном случае, это

7

6 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC520 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8💯6

6 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC516 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥14

30 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC808 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Германия, бледная мать, 1980, Хельма Сандерс-Брамс Новое немецкое кино 1960-1980-х годов создало сотни шедевров. Неудивительно, что за фильмами известных мастеров в тени осталось наследие режиссеров второго и третьего ряда. Однако эта градация построена отнюдь не по критерию качества, так как независимо от своего места в списке признанных и менее признанных картин, все они сделаны руками настоящих знатоков своего де

11👍5

18 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC878 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ищу smm-специалиста для продвижения эдьютейнмента (киноклуб, лекции, дискуссии, семинары, онлайн-школа, каналы в тик-токе, инсте, ютубе). Пишите в личные ваши предложения. В идеале, если вы отправите краткое резюме, включая примеры успешной работы. Вдруг у вас есть друзья эсэмемщики, поделитесь пожалуйста с ними этой информацией. P.S. Следующий пост уже точно будет про кино. Первой выполню заявку Алеши

🔥11👏4

13 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC858 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @existenz_philosophiePhoto

Existenzphilosophie Если я прихожу к себе самому, то я осуществляю свое подлинное сознание бытия. Но если я не почувствую ненаступления себя, то я недоволен собою. Ибо именно свою подлинную свободу я переживаю опытом как данную трансцендентно. Карл Ясперс Ясперс К. Философия. Книга вторая. Просветление экзистенции. М.: Канон+, 2012, c. 44. Existenzphilosophie/Подписаться

👍111

12 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC854 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Всем привет! Когда-то давно посты про кино шли параллельно с философскими цитатами. Как вам идея возобновить эту традицию?

  1. Только не это!8%
  2. Естественно, да49%
  3. Честно - мне все равно17%
  4. Умеренно, пожалуйста21%
  5. Чем больше, тем лучше27%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,020 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

«Я нормально, супер гуд» / Russendisko (2012) Реж. Оливер Цигенбальд Экранизация романа Владимира Каминера. Накануне развала СССР три друга эмигрируют из Москвы в Берлин. Двое из них приехали по «еврейской линии», а у третьего – только краткосрочная виза. Жизнь в тяжелых материальных условиях развивает в них смекалку: от торговли украденными у вьетнамцев сигаретами до организации концертов в стиле «матрешка-балалай

👍106🔥2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @PhilosophyOfCinema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTCFinal Results63 voters

Всем привет! Когда-то давно посты про кино шли параллельно с философскими цитатами. Как вам идея возобновить эту традицию?

  1. Только не это!8%
  2. Естественно, да49%
  3. Честно - мне все равно17%
  4. Умеренно, пожалуйста21%
  5. Чем больше, тем лучше27%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КиноПёс
@kinopes · 105,282
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Art Cinema | Nonconformism | Мода
@Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,265
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Камера, Мотор!
@kammotor · 24,422
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Философия кино” (@PhilosophyOfCinema), 8,702 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PhilosophyOfCinema.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.