Channel
@PhysicsforUPSC
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
2,435subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001269816218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PhysicsforUPSC |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PhysicsforUPSC |
Education β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 2,435 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 2,438 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 2,441 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 2,445 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 2,444 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 2,442 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 2,438 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 2,436 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 2,436 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 15 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 24 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Prelims current affairs priority: 1. Environment and Ecology 2. International Relations 3. Economy 4. Sci & Tech 5. Art and Culture Leave everything else
β€4
Signed π¦
Just one hour of physics daily with PYQ β Short notes will dramatically improve your main exam marks. Be clever and don't emotionally try to chase prelims all day. Go into PYQ mode. Most optimised way to get best of both worlds.
β€5
Signed π¦
in meantime, best practice will be making short notes daily 1 hr from pyq
Signed π¦
By Monday we will have a 2027 batch of ISP. We have boarded a permanent member as a mentor as well worked as a geoscientist as of now.
Signed π¦
Use the PYQ booklets for revision Don't leave Physics
β€1
Signed π¦
Hello everyone, Physics PYQ solutions from 2006β2023, and they are completely free to access. The project is also open for contributions, so anyone from the community can help improve or expand the solutions. You can check it out here: www.civilsync.in If you find it useful, please feel free to share it with other Physics PYQ aspirants and educators so more people can benefit from it. Your feedback and contribuβ¦
Signed ΰ€ ΰ€ΰ₯ΰ€ΰ€Ύΰ€¨ΰ₯
We are live Join the meeting: https://meet.google.com/tnt-nhjd-jfu
Signed π¦
β Around one hour left for our meeting. Please have your meal earlier.
Signed π¦
Optimisation is one big step which can solve much of your problem. Maybe you are doing too much which is not even required.
Signed π¦
β Prelims and Physics | UPSC 2026 β° 9 PM Today https://meet.google.com/tnt-nhjd-jfu
β€2
Signed π¦
Okay we will meet today at 09 PM. Will send meeting link soon. Let's boost the confidence with each other with practical tips on how to PRELIMS with minimal effort.
Signed π¦
Let's Meet for Prelims and Physics revision talk on tomorrow 09 PM for the most optimised way to learn.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed π¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PhysicsforUPSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Let's Meet for Prelims and Physics revision talk on tomorrow 09 PM for the most optimised way to learn.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Select the correct answer using the code below:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The primary advantage of using thorium-229 in precision timekeeping is that:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Conventional atomic clocks, such as cesium clocks, primarily work on the principle of:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 24 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ‘π²π¬π’ππ¬ ππ©ππ’π¨π§ππ₯ | ππππβ (@PhysicsforUPSC), 2,435 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PhysicsforUPSC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.