Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زوربای صورتی🎀

Channel

زوربای صورتی🎀

@PinkZorba

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,258subscribers

-555 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001563663985
TypeChannel
Username@PinkZorba
Descriptionعنوان چنل از اسم شخصیت‌ اصلی کتاب زوربای یونانی، نوشته‌ی نیکوس کازانتزاکیس الهام گرفته شده. قبل از خوندن هر پیام، تگ ادمین رو بخونید تا سوء‌تفاهم پیش نیاد.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PinkZorba

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

12,700 average views per post against 13,258 subscribers — an engagement rate of 95.5%. Across the 8,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.38% and 16.5%, with a median of 8.24%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (2 August 2026 1 September 2026)
Posts measured9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled113,900
Mature posts only95.5% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,258 measured 31 August 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 8,759 channels · p10 1.39% · p25 3.38% · p50 8.24% · p75 16.5% · p90 28.4%
Position in cohort99.498th percentile · 11.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.076% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 1 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,25813,81313,535.56 August 2026 — 13,813 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,813 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,749 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,723 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,709 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,703 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,700 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,699 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,690 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,674 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,660 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,638 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,621 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,619 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,606 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,575 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,472 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,416 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,390 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,368 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,348 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,324 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,296 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,269 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,258 subscribers6 August 202631 August 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net -555. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,175–13,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 17:5613,258-11
30 Aug 2026, 18:4613,269-27
29 Aug 2026, 20:5613,296-28
28 Aug 2026, 17:2313,324-24
27 Aug 2026, 14:4313,348-20
26 Aug 2026, 17:5313,368-22
25 Aug 2026, 14:5613,390-26
24 Aug 2026, 17:1613,416-56
23 Aug 2026, 00:5713,472-103
21 Aug 2026, 14:3513,575-31
20 Aug 2026, 14:2613,606-13
19 Aug 2026, 13:1213,619-2
18 Aug 2026, 14:1813,621-17
17 Aug 2026, 10:4413,638-22
15 Aug 2026, 17:4313,660-14
14 Aug 2026, 06:0713,674-16
12 Aug 2026, 21:0513,690-9
11 Aug 2026, 23:5413,699-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:3113,700-3
10 Aug 2026, 05:1213,703first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.5%
avg views ÷ 13,258 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,700
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total113,900
Reactions total3,277
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
1m 44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,818 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,11043.8%
😭1,53731.9%
💔84217.5%
🔥2605.40%
💊691.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,356 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PinkZorba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈13,800 views684 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

توی آخرین عکسی که ازش گرفتیم داشت با ما درس می‌خوند

😭570💔9420

Signed Saber

7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈14,600 views771 reactions4 Starsread 31 August 2026

بعد از ظهر جمعه ۱۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ آمدم به کافه‌ی مورد علاقه‌ام و سراغ گربه‌ی مورد علاقه‌ام را گرفتم. سکوتی عجیب کافه را گرفته بود و محرک من برای پرسیدن درباره‌ی آن گربه‌ی پر جنب و جوش همین بود. سه‌شنبه به دوستم گفتم من عاشق گربه‌های پرجنب و جوش هستم. ببین آتیش‌پاره با کاپشن صاحب کافه چه کار کرده. پاره پاره شده است! صاحب کافه گفت دیروز او را از دست دادیم. گفت دیروز ماشین زیرش کرد و ما چند ساعت بعد دیدیم یک نفر جسدش را کنا

💔701😭4129

Signed Saber

6 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC≈13,800 views305 reactionsread 31 August 2026

یکی از سوء‌تفاهم‌های بزرگی که در مورد سایکوپث‌ها وجود داره اینه که این افراد اغلب باهوش‌تر از میانگین IQ جامعه هستن، در حالی که دقیقا برعکس، بیشتر سایکوپث‌ها نمره IQ پایین‌تر از میانگین جامعه دارن.

🔥230😭5124

Signed Saber

6 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈13,400 views286 reactionsread 31 August 2026

هرچقدر اپروچ به بیماری‌ها دقیق و گام‌ به گام توی کتاب‌های ما نوشته میشه و داروهاشون بعد کلی تحقیق مشخص میشه همونقدر اسامی بیماری‌ها رندوم و عجیب انتخاب میشه. مثلا یه بیماری زنان داریم که بعد سزارین بین مثانه و رحم فیستول تشکیل میشه. این زنان در خون قاعدگی‌شون ادرار دارن و در ادرارشون هنگام پریود خون دارن. حالا اسم این بیماری چیه؟ سندروم یوسف.

😭26417💔5

Signed Saber

6 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈13,800 views207 reactionsread 31 August 2026

خیلی از شما احتمالا مقاله‌ی “گاباپنتین باعث آلزایمر میشه” رو دیدید. مقاله‌ی خیلی آموزنده‌ایه. نه از این نظر که آموزش میده گاباپنتین باعث آلزایمر میشه، از این نظر که نشون میده هر مقاله‌ای اهمیت نداره و صرفا چون وایرال شده دلیل بر درست بودنش نیست. این مقاله نمیاد شیوع آلزایمر بین بیمارانی که گاباپنتین مصرف می‌کنن و نمی‌کنن رو مقایسه کنه، بلکه میگه ما فلان تعداد بیمار آلزایمری رو بررسی کردیم، درصد زیادی‌شون گاباپنتین مص

190🔥9💊8

Signed Saber

5 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈10,600 views125 reactionsread 31 August 2026

تداخل دارویی خانواده ACEI و ARB با مسکن‌های NSAID یکی از اولین و پیش پا افتاده‌ترین تداخلاتیه که ما می‌خونیم ولی اینقدر مصرف همزمان و بی‌رویه NSAID در جامعه زیاده که اگر راه بیفتی توی خیابون و به مردم بگی داروی فشار چی می‌خوری و اگر لوزارتان، والسارتان، والزومیکس، والزودک و امثالهم می‌خورن بهشون بگی هرروز و بی‌رویه ژلوفن، بروفن و مفنامیک اسید و دیکلوفناک نخور، آمار نارسایی کلیه در کشور یک دهم میشه.

😭9133💊1

Signed Saber

4 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC≈10,700 views504 reactionsread 31 August 2026

سه‌شنبه مورخ ۱۳ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ دوست دارم فکری که در درونم درگیرشم رو باهاتون درمیون بذارم. طبابت در انتها فقط یک شغله، شغلی که تمام وقت شمارو می‌گیره و نمیذاره پاره‌وقت منبع درامد دیگه‌ای داشته باشید. به همین دلیل، در صورتی که درامدتون از طبابت زیاد نباشه فشار روانی زیادی رو تحمل می‌کنید. برای مقابله با این فشار روانی کارهای زیادی کردم. از فروش ماگ گرفته، تا تدریس زبان و مشاوره‌ی کنکور. از برگزاری سمینارهای انلاین تا شیف

462💔26🔥16

Signed Saber

2 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈11,400 views254 reactionsread 31 August 2026

برای دانشجوهای پزشکی: اگر طی تحصیل داخل بخشی بودید که پرستارهای خوبی داشت، سعی کنید هرچیزی که می‌تونید رو ازشون یاد بگیرید. اینطوری اگر موقع طرح افتادید وسط اورژانس ناکجاآباد و پرستارهای تازه‌کاری داشتید، می‌تونید آموخته‌هاتون رو بهشون یاد بدید. هم احترام کادر جدید رو به دست میارید و هم کار بیمارای خودتون بهتر و سریع‌تر انجام میشه.

240😭8💊6

Signed Saber

2 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈11,800 views141 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

به این علامت جالب پوستی Erythema Gyratum Repens یا EGR گفته میشه که نوعی سندروم پارانئوپلاستیکه.

😭11022💊9

Signed Saber

2 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈12,800 views189 reactionsread 31 August 2026

در گذشته با توجه به اینکه جنس بیشتر سنگ‌های کلیه کلسیمی هستن به مردم توصیه میشد مصرف لبنیات رو کاهش بدن و کلسیم کمتری وارد بدنشون کنن. در مطالعات تکمیلی مشخص شد کلسیم رژیم غذایی تاثیر معکوسی داره و هرچقدر بیشتر لبنیات مصرف کنید احتمال سنگ‌های کلسیمی در شما کمتر میشه. برعکس، این مکمل‌های کلسیم و ویتامین دی هستن که می‌تونن موجب ایجاد سنگ بشن. بطور کلی اگر می‌خواید از سنگ کلیه پیشگیری کنید، بیشتر مایعات مصرف کنید، لبنیا

177💊8😭4

Signed Saber

1 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈14,500 views104 reactionsread 31 August 2026

برای دانشجوهای پزشکی و دندان‌پزشکی: اگر دنبال یک منبع همیشه در دسترس برای تست‌ زدن و آموزش می‌گردید من به شما مدوفست رو پیشنهاد می‌کنم. بزرگ‌ترین مزیت مدوفست نسبت به رقبایی مثل دکترآباد اینه که تست تالیفی داره و تست‌های تالیفیش کیفیت بسیار بالایی دارن. درسنامه‌هاشم خوبن. از طریق لینک زیر می‌تونید مدوفست رو چک کنید و اگر احساس کردید براتون مفیده از تست‌هاش استفاده کنید: https://medofast.ir/3072/main-menu

93😭8💊3

Signed Saber

30 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC≈15,900 views202 reactionsread 31 August 2026

هرچند در جامعه مدرن ایران ما بیشتر از اینکه با کمبود ویتامین سی سر و کار داشته باشیم با مصرف بی‌رویه‌ش سر و کار داریم. کلا هر چیزی که باب میشه و میگن مفیده مردم ما شورش رو درمیارن. در حال حاضر ما بیشتر با اسهال، تشدید آسم و آلرژی و سنگ کلیه‌هایی که در زمینه مصرف بی‌رویه ویتامین سی ایجاد شدن طرفیم.

173😭21💊8

Signed Saber

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @PinkZorba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,390 voters approx.

قطع مصرف کدام داروی ضد تشنج راحت تر می باشد؟

  1. کاربامازپین13%
  2. اتوسوکسیماید23%
  3. کلونازپام46%
  4. فنوباربیتال18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 179,830 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

نباید می‌ماندیم - معین دهاز
@nabayad_m · 39,163
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Cellphoneye
@Cellphoneye · 50,933
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 August 2026
اطلاع‌ رسانی وادانا
@Vadana_Iau · 69,627
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
مدیکال استوز | مشاوره کنکور
@medicalstus_ir · 123,413
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زوربای صورتی🎀” (@PinkZorba), 13,258 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PinkZorba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.