Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Piping Engineering

Channel

Piping Engineering

@Piping_Engineering_Academy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,294subscribers

+494 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320827792
TypeChannel
Username@Piping_Engineering_Academy
Description🎓 به آکادمی مهندسی پایپینگ خوش آمدید ✅️ آموزش تخصصی پایپینگ و نرم افزارهای: PDMS & CAESAR II & E3D & SolidWorks 🔶️ انجام پروژه و رزرو تبلیغات 👇 🆔️ ADMIN : @eng_rasouli 🔷️ مشاوره و ثبت نام در دوره های آموزشی 👇 🆔️ @Mechanic_support
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Piping_Engineering_Academy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7998,4408,119.56 August 2026 — 7,800 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,799 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,817 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,821 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,829 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,973 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,032 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,061 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,239 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,285 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,440 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,439 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,424 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,389 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,373 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,369 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,362 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,361 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,351 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,341 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,332 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,313 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,305 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,294 subscribers8,2946 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +494. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,703–8,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:398,294-11
2 Nov 2026, 07:018,305-8
30 Oct 2026, 10:488,313-19
27 Oct 2026, 14:188,332-9
24 Oct 2026, 08:588,341-10
20 Oct 2026, 22:478,351-10
17 Oct 2026, 23:578,361-1
14 Oct 2026, 21:078,362-7
11 Oct 2026, 13:588,369-4
4 Oct 2026, 19:158,373-16
25 Sept 2026, 05:018,389-35
16 Sept 2026, 16:418,424-15
12 Sept 2026, 19:198,439-1
8 Sept 2026, 09:198,440+155
3 Sept 2026, 00:158,285+46
31 Aug 2026, 07:078,239+178
27 Aug 2026, 23:598,061+29
25 Aug 2026, 07:068,032+59
22 Aug 2026, 11:187,973+144
18 Aug 2026, 23:077,829first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 8,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.592%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held100 (22 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total25,017
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,500
Videos
≈872
Links
≈178

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 27m
Average length
6m 42s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

891 reactions across 86 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20923.5%
🔥19121.4%
🙏11913.4%
👏667.41%
💯647.18%
👌515.72%
👍465.16%
😍465.16%
🤩444.94%
🥰333.70%
❤‍🔥80.898%
🏆80.898%
😘40.449%
⚡10.112%
🎉10.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 915 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 92 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Piping_Engineering_Academy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 100 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (8.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC409 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

🔥دوره جامع و تخصصی نرم افزار PDMS 📼 #نمونه_آموزش ✅آموزش نحوه ایجاد عایق برای خطوط پایپینگ و بررسی آن در نقشه آیزومتریک مشاهده کنید 👨‍💼 مدرس: مهندس رسولی ( طراح ارشد پایپینگ ) ✍️جهت مشاوره و تهیه دوره جامع🔽 🔤 @Mechanic_support 📱 @Piping_Engineering_Academy

🔥3👌1👏1💯1🤩1

3 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC≈8,090 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

💥جشنواره پاییز با 40% تخفیف ویژه💥 🚨 دوره جامع آموزش نرم افزار PDMS 💻مدرس: مهندس رسولی ( طراح ارشد پایپینگ ) ⏰ مدت دوره: 65 ساعت آموزش حرفه ای 🆒 پشتیبانی مستقیم و دائمی با مدرس 🏓 سطح دوره: مقدماتی تا پیشرفته 📄 ارائه گواهینامه معتبر 😦 مهلت استفاده از تخفیف : محدود ✍️ جهت مشاوره و ثبت نام🔽 🔤 @Mechanic_support 🤔 کانال تلگرام مهندسی پایپینگ 🤔 کانال مهندسی پایپینگ در پیامرسان بله

😍2❤1🎉1👌1💯1🔥1🤩1

2 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,000 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✅ جایی برای شک و تردید باقی نمیمونه! ❤️ رضایت و نتیجه شما عزیزان هدف اصلیم بوده و خواهد بود ❤️ 📱 @Piping_Engineering_Academy

❤3🏆2💯2👌1🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,060 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

🔴آموزش تخصصی طراحی پایپینگ و تهیه نقشه های دوبعدی & آیزومتریک با نرم افزار PDMS 📼 #نمونه_آموزش 🤔 Isometric Systemy ✅ Design ( Pipework Application ) ✅ Module Draft ( 2D & 3D ) ✅ Module Isodraft ( Isometric ) 👨‍💼 مدرس: مهندس رسولی ( طراح ارشد پایپینگ ) 📱 @Piping_Engineering_Academy

😍2❤1👏1💯1🔥1🤩1🥰1

1 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC887 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✅ پیام رضایت یکی دیگه از دانشپذیران دوره جامع PDMS 🔥فیدبک هایی که تمومی نداره❕ 📱 @Piping_Engineering_Academy

👌2💯2❤1👏1🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 18:11 UTC866 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✅ پیام رضایت دانشپذیران دوره جامع PDMS تمومی نداره 🔥حسابی تحقیق کرده ، ادامشو تو تصویر بخونید 📱 @Piping_Engineering_Academy

❤‍🔥2💯2🔥2❤1👌1

1 Nov 2026, 09:48 UTC906 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🔥مباحثی که در دوره تخصصی کاتالوگ و اسپک نویسی با نرم افزار PDMS فرا میگیرید به شرح زیر میباشد🔽 ✅آموزش ماژول PARAGON & SPECON ✅آموزش CatView برای ورژن های 11 ✅آموزش طبق اسناد و مدارک PMS و استانداردهای Piping ✅ماژول ادمین و بررسی دیتابیس های موردنیاز پایپینگ ✅ماژول پاراگون و آشنایی با ساختار دیتابیس کاتالوگ ✅اموزش ساخت Spwl & Spec و سلسله مراتب آن ✅تعریف Piping Class و ساخت هدینگ ها ✅شرح کامل Question & Answer ✅نحو…

💯3🏆1👌1👏1🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC730 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

✍️ دلیل ثبت این پیام رضایت چیه؟! ✅ دیدن آموزش اصولی و حرفه ای که پشتش تجربه زیادی هست. ✅ دوستان و همکاران باتجربه پایپینگ میدانند این مباحث چقدر باارزشه🔽

❤2👏2💯1

31 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC832 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🔥نظر دانشپذیر درباره آموزش کاتالوگ و اسپک نویسی PDMS 📱 @Piping_Engineering_Academy

🏆2🔥2❤‍🔥1👏1💯1

31 Oct 2026, 15:26 UTC850 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

🟡آموزش تخصصی کاتالوگ و اسپک نویسی در نرم افزار PDMS 📼 #نمونه_آموزش 🤔 بخش کوچکی از آموزش کاتالوگ نویسی ( Valve Handwheel ) ✅ آموزش ماژول PARAGON & SPECON ✅ آموزش CatView برای ورژن های 11 ✅ آموزش طبق اسناد و مدارک PMS و استانداردهای پایپینگ 👨‍💼 مدرس: مهندس رسولی ( طراح ارشد پایپینگ ) 📱 @Piping_Engineering_Academy

💯3👌2❤1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @Piping_Engineering_Academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Piping_Engineering_Academy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @Piping_Engineering_Academy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTCAnonymous Poll255 voters

✅️ کدام نوع شیر برای کنترل دبی و ایجاد افت فشار دقیق در خطوط لوله بیشترین کاربرد را دارد؟

  1. Gate Valve18%
  2. Globe Valve61%
  3. Check Valve13%
  4. Safety Valve11%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

استخدام مهندسی
@job_engineering · 50,180
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
استخدام مهندسین
@OilEstekhdam · 49,004
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Mekanism | مکانیزم‌ها
@mekanism · 57,254
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
مهندس یار
@mohandesyar · 65,526
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Piping Engineering” (@Piping_Engineering_Academy), 8,294 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Piping_Engineering_Academy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.