Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pipoca Pop 🍿

Channel

Pipoca Pop 🍿

@PipocaPop

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,190subscribers

-972 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001887573429
TypeChannel
Username@PipocaPop
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PipocaPop

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,19014,16213,6767 August 2026 — 14,162 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,162 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,141 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,086 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,057 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,022 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,010 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,996 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,963 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,912 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,867 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,859 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,849 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,837 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,835 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,791 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,749 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,721 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,699 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,691 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,675 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,650 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,628 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,606 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,576 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,551 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,529 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,520 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,475 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,411 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,317 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,271 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,218 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,190 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -972. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,044–14,308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:4013,190-28
16 Sept 2026, 15:0013,218-53
14 Sept 2026, 19:0213,271-46
13 Sept 2026, 07:5513,317-94
11 Sept 2026, 09:1713,411-64
8 Sept 2026, 13:5613,475-45
5 Sept 2026, 05:5813,520-9
3 Sept 2026, 12:4113,529-22
2 Sept 2026, 09:4313,551-25
1 Sept 2026, 07:4813,576-30
31 Aug 2026, 05:0613,606-22
30 Aug 2026, 08:2413,628-22
29 Aug 2026, 04:5513,650-25
28 Aug 2026, 08:0313,675-16
27 Aug 2026, 07:1713,691-8
26 Aug 2026, 08:1313,699-22
25 Aug 2026, 09:1213,721-28
24 Aug 2026, 08:0513,749-42
22 Aug 2026, 17:2313,791-44
21 Aug 2026, 11:2713,835first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.16%
avg views ÷ 13,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
417
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.375%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held76 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total4,172
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19m 51s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 33 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7360.8%
🔥1714.2%
👍75.83%
👏43.33%
😢43.33%
😱43.33%
🤮43.33%
🕊32.50%
🥰21.67%
🤔10.833%
🥴10.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
28.9%
22 of 76 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
371
over 22 measured posts
Median views · rest
686
over 53 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Trailer de Harry Potter e a Pedra Filosofal, é divulgado. A série é estrelada por Dominic McLaughlin, Arabella Stanton, Alastair Stout, John Lithgow, Nick Frost, Janet McTeer e Paapa Essiedu, e estreia em 25 de dezembro na HBO Max. @PipocaPop 🍿

👏2🤮1

2 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC117 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br3

Posted without readable text

1 Sept 2026, 17:24 UTC951 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Em julho, durante o voo de retorno de uma cúpula da OTAN na Turquia, o presidente Trump deixou discretamente o Air Force One em um caminhão de catering e embarcou secretamente em outra aeronave — enquanto os repórteres que viajavam com ele seguiam viagem sem perceber que o presidente já não estava a bordo. Instadocs: The Decoy Plane, que estreia em 4 de setembro na Netflix, revisita o episódio por meio de relatos em

4

1 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC224 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br2

Posted without readable text

30 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC156 viewsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br2

Posted without readable text

29 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC148 viewsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br3

Posted without readable text

28 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC142 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br3

Posted without readable text

27 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC171 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br3

Posted without readable text

25 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,940 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

A Netflix confirmou a estreia de Escândalo e Intriga para 18 de setembro. O drama histórico se passa na Era Joseon e é estrelado por Son Ye-jin, Ji Chang-wook e pela cantora e atriz NANA. Inspirada no clássico romance francês As Ligações Perigosas (1782), de Pierre Choderlos de Laclos, a produção coreana traz uma sensibilidade moderna a um drama de época, explorando personagens que desafiam tabus sociais para perseg

4🥴1

25 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC242 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br4

Posted without readable text

24 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC933 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

A sequência de Como Perder um Homem em 10 Dias está oficialmente em desenvolvimento na Paramount. A intenção é que Kate Hudson e Matthew McConaughey reprisem seus papéis. @PipocaPop 🍿

2🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC208 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br4

Posted without readable text

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @PipocaPop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Qual a probabilidade de você utilizar o Amazon Music nos próximos dias?

  1. Muito favorável18%
  2. Um pouco favorável9%
  3. Neutro9%
  4. Um pouco desfavorável9%
  5. Muito desfavorável55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Clube da Mente
@clubedamente · 31,938
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 12 here — alongside 11 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pipoca Pop 🍿” (@PipocaPop), 13,190 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PipocaPop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.