Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pirate Calls 💎

Channel

Pirate Calls 💎

@PirateGemsCall

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,633subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001599787591
TypeChannel
Username@PirateGemsCall
CreatedBetween 1 September 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PirateGemsCall

Growth

6,6336,7656,6996 August 2026 — 6,765 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,765 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,762 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,749 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,727 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,712 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,676 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,678 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,651 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,665 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,682 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,652 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,633 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,613–6,785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:376,633-19
4 Sept 2026, 06:216,652-30
31 Aug 2026, 15:356,682+17
28 Aug 2026, 19:596,665+14
25 Aug 2026, 19:076,651-27
22 Aug 2026, 13:346,678+2
19 Aug 2026, 12:346,676-36
16 Aug 2026, 04:586,712-15
13 Aug 2026, 01:446,727-22
9 Aug 2026, 21:186,749-13
7 Aug 2026, 00:086,762-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:156,765no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:066,765first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.95%
avg views ÷ 6,633 subscribers
Avg views / post
395
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held49 (2 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total7,895
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

211 reactions across 47 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10951.7%
209.48%
❤‍🔥209.48%
👍167.58%
🫡157.11%
🐳146.64%
👏94.27%
🆒62.84%
👾20.948%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC155 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$SOLCAT hit 510k mc rn. Chart moving well and ready for reversal. Lets see https://dexscreener.com/solana/f8rp1gi6qrozi9xnyjzrmhxfhpmucuc9cozr3hrubzuf

🔥3

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

18 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC433 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$SOLCAT (SOL)🔥 The official $WIF TG just pinned a picture of $WIF wearing the $SOLCAT hardhat $WIF x $SOLCAT 🤝 https://x.com/Solcat_On_SOL/status/2089622696988754064 https://dexscreener.com/solana/f8rp1gi6qrozi9xnyjzrmhxfhpmucuc9cozr3hrubzuf 4skFA8FequaJV8Zd3njafvMvmX4yVbnzmBRo4jXVpump

❤‍🔥2🔥2👏1

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

18 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @KOLscopeVideo

🔶️ DIP MODE: 3x+🔫 @PirateGemsCall made 3x+ on 犇犇 from dip. $873K DIP ⮕ $2.99M 🔎 Call❕💍 KOL 🆖 Set custom filters and let gems come to you through our Alerts Bot 💎

🔥2

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

17 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC386 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

2x+ on $犇犇 😎 Touched at 3m mc. Chart look so prime. https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x103f0e8cac08d41afe09a4445587054f80f05fec

🔥3

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

17 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC423 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$犇犇 (BSC)🔥 Pretty insane chart for 犇犇 so far. Find safe entry on dip when going in. Ticker is good. And volume is crazy. https://x.com/Hugo_grupillo/status/2087150268970590278 https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x103f0e8cac08d41afe09a4445587054f80f05fec 0x3030a6d0b748c02e5543cad9200D715c7Bfb7777

❤‍🔥3🔥2

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

17 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC415 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$FTR (SOL)🔥 Bought a bags here. Good ticker. Watch your entries. The future isn’t just electric, it’s airborne. Flying Tesla Roadster is a community-driven token inspired by Elon Musk’s vision of a rocket powered Roadster that can briefly fly. Built around one of Tesla’s most ambitious ideas. https://dexscreener.com/solana/cj2ohyuhe2ktjexd4erbbbxckfqab4teebivlhnpj6gs Dmkj4dB3Ngva9gWKkDgj8UMF39EC7ArpGf2rxLxDpump

👏3👍21

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

16 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC418 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

2x+ on $KORI404 😎 Smashed to 390k. Good volume so far. https://dexscreener.com/solana/13recbvvnurgzcjrnl1z6hv8i8126oohjdxujrgcgm2j

🫡3🔥2

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

16 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC425 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$KORI404 tapped at 285k. Nice run and chart moving well. https://dexscreener.com/solana/13recbvvnurgzcjrnl1z6hv8i8126oohjdxujrgcgm2j

🔥3

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

16 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC400 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$KORI404 (SOL)🔥 Bought some bags here. New launch. Good ticker. Watch your entries. KORI 404 is what happens when the internet’s favorite Pomeranian refuses to remain inside the screen. One moment she’s in the feed. The next, the page is ripped open, pixels are everywhere, and KORI is already strutting into the real world. https://dexscreener.com/solana/13recbvvnurgzcjrnl1z6hv8i8126oohjdxujrgcgm2j 5STRSXMndEbWFh

🔥2🐳1👍1

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

15 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC477 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$牛来 smashed to 275k at new ATH. Nice ran so far. https://dexscreener.com/solana/9n7jwifjnjm68jjuj1yw8auwaor9kaknegzikpzdetxv

🔥2🫡1

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

15 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC436 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$豹拉 hit 900k mc. Chart moving well. https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xa82a1988cc8002ba11cc9d4ac3c655d55ff2be82

🔥4

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

15 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC436 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$豹拉 (BSC) 🔥 The bull run is going wild—this is the next big dragon. The team has taken over. it's all-in do or die. https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xa82a1988cc8002ba11cc9d4ac3c655d55ff2be82 0xbB469d64E89c8B2fE0221052220A96a7F1C67777

👍32🔥1

Signed Lucas | PirateGemsCall

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @PirateGemsCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cookie sale's 🍪
@Cookiesales · 74,623
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️
@TheCrypto100XGems · 28,537
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
MiniDraft Calls
@minidraftcalls · 74,588
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Topresale 💎
@topresale · 88,132
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Koba's Calls
@kobascalls · 33,983
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pirate Calls 💎” (@PirateGemsCall), 6,633 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PirateGemsCall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.