Channel
@Po_broker_feedback
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,421subscribers
+525 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003358967740 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Po_broker_feedback |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Po_broker_feedback |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 2,421 | +63 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 2,358 | +29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 2,329 | +43 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:54 | 2,286 | +73 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 2,213 | +69 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 2,144 | +81 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 2,063 | +8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 2,055 | +35 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 2,020 | +13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 2,007 | +20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 1,987 | +51 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 1,936 | +35 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,901 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,896 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,896 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
114 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 39 | 34.2% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 19.3% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.26% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 5.26% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Another champion🚬 "When I first funded my account, I lost everything trying to meet the turnover requirement. But after reaching out for guidance and following your advice, everything turned around. This withdrawal might seem small to some, but to me it's the biggest milestone of my entire trading career." Same story as always - it wasn't luck, it was finally doing it the smart way. Reached out, adjusted the approac…
👍4❤3🔥2
Been a minute since I posted your reviews - let's fix that 🔥 Small balance, big lesson 🧠 Respect to this trader for the hustle on a micro balance - but even more respect for what they did next Started small - barely enough room for a normal drawdown. Ran it up, then made the smart call: pulled profits and rebuilt with a real buffer That right there is the actual skill. Not the run itself - the discipline to lock …
👍4❤1
New feedback from our trader 📊 That’s what happens when you trade with a plan No gambling. No tilt. No “win it back fast” nonsense. Just a clean, systematic approach with Pocket Robot - and the result speaks for itself 👉 @PO_BROKER_BOT - AI for traders who actually think first 🧠 💬 @Apex_Victor - Questions? DM me 🙌
❤6👏6👍3🔥3💯2
Another real review just landed in my DMs 🔥 This is exactly what I keep telling you fam - demo first, find your method, then go real. Nice and steady, no rushing it. That's how you actually get somewhere with this thing 💪 Not instant wins. Just better habits, cleaner sessions, less chaos. 👉 @PO_BROKER_BOT - test it, learn it, trade it 💬 @Apex_Victor - Questions? DM me 🙌
👍6🔥3❤1
This guy just methodically stacks his balance without stopping. No oversized risks, no gambling, just steady consistent income 🔥 This is exactly who the bot was built for. Want the same? 😏 👉 @PO_BROKER_BOT - steady wins over time 💬 @Apex_Victor - I'll set you up right 🤝
🔥5
From $500 to $1065 in 5 days. Not a single lost trade 🔥 "After 5 days of trading, following your instructions religiously, I am on $1065 👍👌" "1 or 3$ trades, every 30 minutes or hour, 10 second expiration weekdays and 15 second expiration weekends, thankfully I have not lost a single trade 🙏 thank you Victor" This is what happens when someone actually follows the rules instead of winging it. Small trades, patience…
👍4🔥2❤1
This guy gets it. Even the best tool out there has rules you gotta respect: 1️⃣ Pick the right strategy for your balance ✅ 2️⃣ Don't oversize your trades ✅ 3️⃣ Don't run too many sessions back to back so the platform's algorithms can't adapt to the bot's patterns and screw it over ✅ Result? Wall of green screenshots. Chipping away small consistent profits that add up to something real 💰 You with us? 😏 👉 @PO_BROKE…
❤6👍4🔥2
This guy turned the bot into a personal sneaker fund 😂 Air Max 90s paid for in 2 days. "I got a problem but at least it's a profitable problem" - can't even argue with that 🔥 No it's not a Ferrari. But that's his goal and who are we to judge 😏 Everyone's got their thing. The tool just makes it happen. Got a story like this? Send it over - 500 💎 tokens for a solid review 👉 @PO_BROKER_BOT - what are you spending yo…
❤9🤣6😁3
This one hit different 💪 $500 in. $3k in a month. Withdrew $2k. And then: "I quit my job bro 😂 now I can actually take my time and find something decent without stressing about how I'm gonna eat" That's what this is about fam. Not Lambos. Not flexing. Just breathing room. Freedom to make choices without panic. Did I tell him he's withdrawing too early? Yeah 😏 But it's his money and he made the right call for hims…
👍7❤5
Ever wonder what's actually happening when you hit that button? 🚬 Under the hood the bot runs two AI engines simultaneously: 🧠 Opus 4.7 - deep market analysis layer ⚡ Codex GPT - real-time execution engine Here's what they do in those couple of minutes: 📊 Scan 20+ technical indicators across multiple timeframes 📰 Parse breaking financial news in real time 🌐 Crawl social media for insider sentiment and early signa…
👍7🔥5❤4
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Po_broker_feedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚀 Feedback | POCKET ROBOT” (@Po_broker_feedback), 2,421 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Po_broker_feedback.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.