Channel
@Podvalchekf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002093515221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Podvalchekf |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Podvalchekf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 48 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 47 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 46 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 46 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
136 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 76 | 55.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 36 | 26.5% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 5.15% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.68% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 2.94% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.94% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 2.21% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.735% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Podvalchekf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Думал буду ли я все таки постить это или нет, но сейчас запосщу в ТГК пока что. Продолжаю рисовать челиксов из wwm Это снова тот брошкенс которого я скетчил самым первым из всех людей из wwm Пока не особо много кто ещё зацепил скинами из чата А так продолжаю деградировать в игре, закрывая все что только можно и нельзя Увидел что на китайском сервере выходил один классный скин, а значит скоро он будет и у нас. Сейча…
❤8🍓4🥰3
С первым днем лета кстати 🌹
❤7
Свою часть я уже чутка (не чутка) спойлерил НО ВОТ И КОЛЛАБА С МОЕЙ МНОГОУВАЖАЕМОЙ ПОДРУНЕЙ очень уж я люблю коллабиться с ней 🌹 спойлер: райз ответит нет В июле я прям начал активничать жоска, надо на боковую до зимы
❤🔥7🎉1🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
Мне очень плохо от того как тик ток сильно жрет качество фоток Это не норм, но видимо мне придется каким то образом загружать арты с помощью видосов P.s: на самом деле меня это прям сильно задизморалило
💔7
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2
where winds meet с каждым разом нрав все больше потому может быть еще будут арты/скетчи с челами из чата Хотелось бы социализироваться начать в этом прекрасном обществе Но я еще совсем смешарик, потому методично зачищаю карту и прохожу сюжетец (пока не банковскую карту, но ОЧЕНЬ ХОЧЕТСЯ)
❤8
продолжаю рисовать каких то челов из чата в wwm Думал что не особо то и разнообразных персов можно наделать в игре где есть гача на костюмы НОО Видимо я не играл в нормальные игры и в wwm достаточно много прикольных персов у мажоров ахах Очень простенький арт в плане того как я нарисовал перса на скине больше деталей будто бы, но мне очень душно стало под конец (как обычно, потому в тгк очень много скетчей хаха) (…
❤🔥6
Спойлерну вам Чето скоро будет 🌹
❤8🕊3🔥1
решил по рофлу поскетчить какого то рандома из where winds meet . Попозже может поскетчу еще рандомов или своего перса. Жалко что скины там ну уж очень тяжело достать( P.s: волосы конечно длиннее чем у персонажа, но скетч на быструю руку, а рука привыкла рисовать длинные волосы у персов ( Надо учится рисовать короткие лол
❤7🔥1
У мя оч скудны идеи на арты, но мне давно угрожали физической расправой если бы я не нарисовал обложку для ютуб канала. По этому за часов 7 беспрерывных мучений, у меня есть что то похожее на "обложку" Их у меня невероятно мало, но за то +- красивые 💥 (теперь мне надо нарисовать аву для ютуба, но это где то через месяцок сна) В комменты отправлю файлом, но весит он слегка НЕ МАЛО
❤🔥7❤1
Мозг перед смерью че то там
❤🔥9🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Podvalchekf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AMARAIZ TEAROOM” (@Podvalchekf), 48 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Podvalchekf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.