Channel
@Poland_161Crew
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,124subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001210295875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Poland_161Crew |
| Created | 14 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Poland_161Crew |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 2,124 | +1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 2,123 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 2,125 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 2,126 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:26 | 2,128 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 2,126 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 2,127 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 2,138 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 2,133 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 2,138 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 2,136 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 2,135 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 2,134 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 2,137 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 2,137 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
240 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 145 | 60.4% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 12.5% | |
| 😡 | 29 | 12.1% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 9.17% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 2.92% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.50% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.417% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Prawdopodobnie niewielu z was słyszało o "Pax Silica" — a to jedna z ciekawszych i bardziej niepokojących historii geopolitycznych ostatnich miesięcy. Wyjaśniamy, o co chodzi. Czym jest Pax Silica? To wspólna inicjatywa USA i rządu Filipin, w ramach której na terenie New Clark City w prowincji Tarlac ma powstać ogromny hub przemysłowy — fabryki półprzewodników, centra danych i zakłady przetwarzania minerałów krytycz…
👍9😡2❤1
O co walczyli powstańcy warszawscy w sierpniu 1944 roku? Co tam się za lewactwo odstawiało panie... Tak pisała "Warszawianka", powstańcze pismo PPS: (Za profilem https://www.facebook.com/przywrocmypamiecopatronachwykletych )
❤7🔥3
1 sierpnia 2026 roku Młodzież Wszechpolska pochwaliła się na swoim profilu dewastacją miejsca pamięci związanego z Powstaniem Warszawskim. Wydarzenie to może szokować, tym bardziej że organizacja ta od lat kreuje się na patriotów. W rzeczywistości jednak jej działalność sprowadza się do wykluczania z grona patriotów wszystkich tych, którzy chcą celebrować swoją polskość i przywiązanie do korzeni w sposób nieszowinist…
😡8
4 sierpnia 1944 roku od kuli snajpera zginął Krzysztof Kamil Baczyński, żołnierz ruchu oporu i poeta swojego pokolenia. Prawica jak zwykle milczeniem pomija jego lewicowe poglądy, więc my je co roku przypominamy. https://161crew.bzzz.net/patriotyzm-czy-po-prostu-antyfaszyzm/
🫡7
Są znów dostępne wszystkie rozmiary. Jest dodruk. Koszulki inspirowane AFA Ireland w kooperacji DRUKOWNIA 161 oraz Olga J'13 Kisielewicz Cena 70 zł + koszt przesyłki. Zamówienia: Messenger lub mail: [email protected]
👍2💔1🔥1😡1
Z raz obranej drogi nigdy nie zawrócili. Nieważne że było pod prąd i w niedozwolonej prędkości.
❤17😡4
https://www.facebook.com/damian.katyl Jeden z przykładów pokemonów, jakie pojawiają się u nas w komentarzach. Na profilu nazistowskie symbole, tasowanie się hitlerowskimi kapelami jak honor i oczywiście jak przystało na prawdziwego "patryjotę" kibic legiuni. Zapewne 1 sierpnia razem z kolegami z kibolki krzyczał o bohaterach i chwale...
👍8❤2
Nasz wczorajszy post wywołał przewidywalny incydent kałowy wśród "najprawdziwszych z patriotów". Wielu z nich wpadło tutaj wyrazić swoje gorzkie żale. Na profilach mieliśmy pełen przekrój patologii, od konfederosji i braunistów, przez stadionowych nacjonalistów, członków rożnych organizacji i grup zrzeszających skrajnie prawicowe ameby, a i nie zabrakło nawet otwartych nazioli. Była husaria, generowane w AI antyukrai…
❤17😡3
1 sierpnia to też rocznica powstania w getcie w Będzinie https://161crew.bzzz.net/powstanie-w-bedzinie-walka-o-pamiec
❤6👍2
1 sierpnia 1944 roku o godz. 17.00 (tzw. Godzina „W”) wybuchło Powstanie Warszawskie. Jak zawsze w tym okresie chcemy wspomnieć o tych, którzy podjęli nierówną walkę. Nie zapominamy przy tym o tysiącach ofiar cywilnych — zarówno biorących udział w Powstaniu, jak i ginących z rąk nazistowskich okupantów podczas masowych rzezi ludności. Skrajna prawica od dłuższego czasu pisze na nowo historię. Zawłaszczają sobie lewic…
❤20😡2
Wczoraj media szeroko informowały o uderzeniu rosyjskiej rakiety w terytorium Polski. A tutaj zaledwie tydzień wcześniej kibole Widzewa prezentujący się dumnie na stadionie z rosyjską flagą. Czy to już oficjalna zdrada, czy wskazanie, do jakiego ustroju “prawilnym” środowiskom jest najbliżej? Przypomnijmy, że to ci sami ludzie, którzy raz po raz krzyczą „Narodowy Widzew!" podczas antyimigranckich demonstracji.
❤18👍1
Zanim zacznie się płacz, że nieprawda, że manipulacja, że lewacka propaganda- z naszej strony to wykorzystanie dobrego cytatu, który kilka dni temu zobaczyliśmy w Internecie, a jednocześnie oczywiście trochę licencja poetycka. W każdym razie biorąc pod uwagę, że osoby chodzące w koszulkach Polski Walczacej potrafią w inne dni hajlować i obnosić się z nazistowskimi symbolami, to płacz zdecydowanie nie powinien być kie…
❤23😡5
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Poland_161Crew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“161 Crew” (@Poland_161Crew), 2,124 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Poland_161Crew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.