Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PolyMarket New Crypto Bets

Channel

PolyMarket New Crypto Bets

@Polymarketnewcryptobets

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,007subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003090311708
TypeChannel
Username@Polymarketnewcryptobets
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Polymarketnewcryptobets

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0071,0321,019.57 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,022 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,021 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,019 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,017 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,012 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,011 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,009 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,007 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,003–1,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:591,007-2
14 Sept 2026, 17:591,009-2
11 Sept 2026, 09:581,011-1
7 Sept 2026, 01:561,012-5
2 Sept 2026, 14:241,017-2
30 Aug 2026, 09:431,019-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:171,021-1
24 Aug 2026, 10:131,022-3
20 Aug 2026, 17:041,025-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:051,026-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:151,027-5
7 Aug 2026, 16:361,032no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:321,032first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

13 Apr 2026, 04:39 UTC228 viewsread 7 August 2026

Will Microstrategy announce a Bitcoin purchase April 14-20? Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

12 Apr 2026, 21:31 UTC239 viewsread 7 August 2026

Will Variational launch a token by June 30, 2026? Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

12 Apr 2026, 21:31 UTC259 viewsread 7 August 2026

Will Variational launch a token by September 30, 2026? Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

12 Apr 2026, 20:53 UTC236 viewsread 7 August 2026

Will Qingdao Xihaian FC win on 2026-05-10? Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

12 Apr 2026, 20:53 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026

Will Qingdao Hainiu FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC end in a draw? Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

12 Apr 2026, 20:53 UTC211 viewsread 7 August 2026

Will Qingdao Hainiu FC win on 2026-05-10? Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

12 Apr 2026, 20:53 UTC229 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Will Qingdao Xihaian FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC end in a draw? Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

12 Apr 2026, 07:37 UTC156 viewsread 7 August 2026

Beijing Ducks vs. Qingdao Eagles Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

9 Apr 2026, 22:29 UTC152 viewsread 7 August 2026

Qingdao Eagles vs. Ningbo Rockets Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

9 Apr 2026, 22:29 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026

Qingdao Eagles vs. Liaoning Flying Leopards Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

9 Apr 2026, 16:06 UTC142 viewsread 7 August 2026

Spread: Qingdao Hainiu FC (-2.5) Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

9 Apr 2026, 16:06 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026

Wuhan San Zhen FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: O/U 2.5 Trade Market Below! 👇 View Market

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Polymarketnewcryptobets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PolyMarket New Crypto Bets” (@Polymarketnewcryptobets), 1,007 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Polymarketnewcryptobets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.