Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПингвиСтан

Channel

ПингвиСтан

@PrapoR_tg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,065subscribers

+1,637 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001734789860
TypeChannel
Username@PrapoR_tg
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PrapoR_tg

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

22,02124,25723,1397 August 2026 — 22,428 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,428 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,422 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,392 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,371 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,355 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,282 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,255 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,233 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,213 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,240 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,218 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,190 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,129 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,113 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,092 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,061 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,044 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,049 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,057 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,040 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,021 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,211 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,622 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,578 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,739 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,843 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,902 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22,948 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,016 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,022 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,249 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,245 subscribers18 September 2026 — 23,197 subscribers1 October 2026 — 22,860 subscribers6 October 2026 — 23,260 subscribers10 October 2026 — 23,505 subscribers13 October 2026 — 23,690 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,648 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,620 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,589 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,568 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,249 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,219 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,257 subscribers22 October 2026 — 24,239 subscribers23 October 2026 — 24,226 subscribers24 October 2026 — 24,224 subscribers25 October 2026 — 24,244 subscribers26 October 2026 — 24,200 subscribers27 October 2026 — 24,239 subscribers28 October 2026 — 24,197 subscribers29 October 2026 — 24,152 subscribers30 October 2026 — 24,134 subscribers1 November 2026 — 24,106 subscribers1 November 2026 — 24,101 subscribers2 November 2026 — 24,098 subscribers3 November 2026 — 24,084 subscribers4 November 2026 — 24,065 subscribers24,0657 August 20264 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net +1,637. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,686–24,592 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 22:2824,065-19
3 Nov 2026, 21:1124,084-14
2 Nov 2026, 23:3024,098-3
1 Nov 2026, 21:3924,101-5
1 Nov 2026, 00:1824,106-28
30 Oct 2026, 21:0724,134-18
29 Oct 2026, 18:2824,152-45
28 Oct 2026, 18:1124,197-42
27 Oct 2026, 17:3124,239+39
26 Oct 2026, 14:4924,200-44
25 Oct 2026, 11:2924,244+20
24 Oct 2026, 12:4924,224-2
23 Oct 2026, 13:2624,226-13
22 Oct 2026, 10:4624,239-18
21 Oct 2026, 01:5124,257+38
19 Oct 2026, 23:1624,219-30
19 Oct 2026, 02:4724,249+681
18 Oct 2026, 06:1823,568-21
17 Oct 2026, 05:0923,589-31
16 Oct 2026, 05:0923,620first reading

Engagement

246 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 24,065 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,740
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 246 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held246 (31 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total302,547
Reactions total5,916
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 36s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,912 reactions across 209 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,27230.7%
🔥3,55925.6%
👍1,64411.8%
🤯4203.02%
💔3862.77%
👏2942.11%
😁2932.11%
😢2461.77%
🤔2381.71%
🍌2241.61%
👌2051.47%
🗿1931.39%
🥴1771.27%
❤‍🔥1651.19%
🤣1591.14%
🥰1591.14%
🤪1370.985%
🌚1340.963%
🤨1120.805%
🤝1100.791%
36 further kinds7855.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 210 of the 246 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,912 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 246 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 215 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PrapoR_tg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 246 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 37 of 89 posts held from the last 30 days (41.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC5 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😃🎁Стрим: МАРАФОН ФРАГОВ!? Стримы тут: 🎬Вк плей: https://live.vkvideo.ru/prapor 💻Ютуб: https://youtube.com/live/pBBCfbjfwG0 _____________________________________________ ======================================= 🎬На ВК - Лутаешь баллы и обмениваешь на различные награды.... 🤨Из наград можно забрать: - Коллекционные Танки 10 уровня - Премиум танки 7-8 уровня. - Контейнеры - Боевой Пропуск

4 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC≈1,460 views28 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😃Мистики Обновили в игре... Кто ещё не открывал, информация для вас... 😐 Что-то слишком много лудки "на 1 квадратный лудазин"🫠

❤24🤨3🙈1

4 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,910 views93 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🤨Ну как вам Ивент на Слив Ресурсов? Сколько слили и что залутали? 🤓Делитесь в комментариях..

💔50❤31👍7🫡3👌2

4 Nov 2026, 08:26 UTC≈2,130 views163 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🤨616000 чип-карт у меня на аккаунте. Думаю, стрим подрубить и открыть на стриме. Жмем 99👌и погнали открывать. Делаем?

👌158👍4❤1

4 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,130 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😃 Слив Ресурсов «Золотой фонд» уже доступен! Заходи в игру с 4 по 11 ноября 11:00 (МСК) и обменивай свои ресурсы на сокровища. Тут техника, кастомизация, контейнеры и другие награды — и всё это может стать твоим со Значками и Чип-картами! Как получить🟡Значки: • Одерживай победу на технике IV–X уровней. • Заработать минимальное количество опыта за бой. В счёт идёт опыт, заработанный в обычных и рейтинговых боях, а т…

🔥19❤3👍2

4 Nov 2026, 05:32 UTC≈2,190 views31 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😃В игре стал доступен режим "Реалистичный" 🔴Пройдёт он с 4 по 13 Ноября ☺️Становимся в кустиках и играем?😊

👍25❤6

3 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC≈2,640 views54 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😃СЛИВ РЕСУРСОВ (завтра) 4 ноября. 🤓 Уже Готовы к ещё одной вакханалии? 🔴Чуть больше информации на сайте: СМОТРЕТЬ ТУТ прошлый анонс от разработчиков...

❤39💔11👍4

3 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC≈2,920 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤33👏3🤓3👍2😢1

2 Nov 2026, 14:13 UTC≈3,290 views79 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😃Добавили пак на 40 контов и обновили мистики... 🫠Открываем получается?

❤61😭15🗿3

2 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC≈3,070 views85 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🫠Как вам обновленные мистические контейнеры? 🤓Стало хуже с таким обновлением, иль вам всё нравится? Пишите своё мнение в комментариях...

💔73❤7🌭2🤯2🌚1

2 Nov 2026, 11:50 UTC≈2,900 views67 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🎁100 мистиков на видос? Делаем?

❤61💊3🤯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 246 posts we hold for @PrapoR_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@PrapoR_tg edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 31 posts on @PrapoR_tg as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
14

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⚡𝐸𝐴𝑆𝑌:𝐵𝐿𝐼𝑇𝑍⚡
@Blitz_678_werty · 41,866
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Mad Maks Blitz
@mad_maks_blitz · 57,227
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
KVM PUB
@WotPUB · 59,644
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Zlobina Channel
@zlobinachannel · 18,937
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 October 2026
Blitz Hata
@tanksblitz · 81,617
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПингвиСтан” (@PrapoR_tg), 24,065 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrapoR_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.