Channel
@PredatorySparrow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
134subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002014661938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PredatorySparrow |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PredatorySparrow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 134 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 133 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 134 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 137 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 137 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
I don't care for proving myself as being the real PredatorySparrow or one of the talents from Anonymous or even a hacker. People believe what they at the end of the day. I have too much responsibilities and I'm over here entertaining people who don't like me. I don't want to keep going back and forth. It's turning me into a person that I'm not.
Might just delete Telegram, it's too much of a distraction for me. The hackers here are not very kind and I'm not making any money at all. It's become too toxic for me and I don't know why I allow myself to be mistreated. I want to surround myself with people who bring out the best in me. I'd like to focus on myself instead what others think.
</3
and this guy is suppose to be my best friend and he's my only friend
So sad. I do know difference between SQL injection and Javascript.. what i highlighted in yellow is javascript. i don't know why i wrote it under SQL injection, that's not a SQL injection you are correct :\ I messed up there taking my notes. Not sure what happened there
fucking meme
and you were a "blockchain developer", when u cant even differentiate between xss and sql injection LMAO
u have no idea what the fuck your talking about
u literally put javascript:alert under the SQL injection page, thats fucking funny javascript:anything is not sql injection that is XSS or Javascript Injection (JI) LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
my question is why the fuck would anybody think javascript: is sql injection when javascript and sql is its own language
https://polygonscan.com/token/0x1baEE96d450A46f02585CcbB263577F7b2A85755
Here's a lovely smart contract that I created. Maybe my crypto will do well! You'll never know until you try. It would be cool if it went well :))
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PredatorySparrow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Predatory Sparrow” (@PredatorySparrow), 134 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PredatorySparrow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.