Channel
Кепка Пригожина
@Prigozhin_hat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
204,825subscribers
-4,101 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001318845663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Prigozhin_hat |
| Created | 4 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Prigozhin_hat |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 204,825 | -121 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 204,946 | -156 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 205,102 | -102 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 205,204 | -122 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 205,326 | -187 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 205,513 | -244 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 205,757 | -134 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 205,891 | -104 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:07 | 205,995 | -98 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:08 | 206,093 | -77 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 206,170 | -96 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 206,266 | -87 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 206,353 | -80 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 206,433 | -99 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 206,532 | -100 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 206,632 | -117 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 206,749 | -511 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 207,260 | -644 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 207,904 | -57 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 207,961 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 7 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@wagner_return · 1,9393 postsАнтифашизм
@AntiNazism2022 · 2481 postДядя Миша DT
@Drifttrooper · 5,2741 postFugas [Z]
@Fugasmg13 · 481 post𝐌𝐫.𝐖𝐚𝐠𝐧𝐞𝐫
@Gm_Wagner69 · 31 postНе чокаясь
@Ne4okayas · 9781 postWild Geese Hub
@WildGHub · 2151 postТринадцатый.
@Z13_Separ · 212,7721 postТочка зрения СВО
@armnovoctin · 8,0461 postДиджитал-выборы
@digitalelections · 591 postZONA КОНФЛИКТА
@djostinsway · 71 postДонбасс Z
@donbaz_z · 2851 postПортфель Генштаба
@genshtab24 · 83,4701 postВолонтеры на линии огня
@helpdonbasspeople · 1901 postКровь мешками
@krovmeshki · 1,6251 postСОМБ («Туристы» в Африке)
@officersunion · 10,9611 postОт Мариуполя до Карпат
@osvedomitell_alex · 66,3581 postПарни из СПЕЦНАЗА| 607 ЦСН
@parni607 · 111 postRomanov Лайт ]ࣩࣩࣩࣩ࣯ࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩ
@romanov_92 · 151,2991 postРусский Доброволец
@russian_volunteer · 3,0111 postRUSVARG
@rusvarg · 38,8431 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kolezev · 59,88122 postsIn medias res | Публицистика, философия медиа, стихи
@MediasRes2022 · 3482 postsReadovka
@readovkanews · 2,012,2622 postsМир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,672,0952 postsД О Л Г О В Щ И Н А
@dolgova1 · 2,7771 postДонбасс Z
@donbaz_z · 2851 postИСТОК
@istokZ · 621 postОкрошка на белом квасе
@okroshka_na_belom · 2091 postПовёрнутые СВО
@podinazovet · 11 postНа красных номерах
@red_license · 6991 postVenture Hacks for Startups
@theuntitledventures · 8031 postVasilev_V
@vasilev_gr · 1,3011 postВладислав
@VladickSamisirov · 21 postWagner Return
@wagner_return · 1,9391 postZloy художник
@zloyhudozhnik · 4441 postZ_BLOG - Сообщество Русскоязычных Блогеров
@zov_blog · 511 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…Monolog{{Internetquelle |autor=Jewgeni Prigoschin (Primärquelle) |url=https://t.me/Prigozhin_hat/3790 |titel=Публикуем первую часть большого интервью Евгения…”
read 13 September 2026
“…(Audioaufnahmen in Russisch): https://t.me/Prigozhin_hat/2694 https://t.me/Prigozhin_hat/2696 https://t.me/Prigozhin_hat/2703}}{{Internetquelle…”
read 13 September 2026
“…(Audioaufnahmen in Russisch): https://t.me/Prigozhin_hat/2694 https://t.me/Prigozhin_hat/2696 https://t.me/Prigozhin_hat/2703}}<ref…”
read 13 September 2026
Hacker News
This handle was named 2 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кепка Пригожина” (@Prigozhin_hat), 204,825 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Prigozhin_hat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.