Maybe youโre not suddenly a bad trader. Maybe youโre just in a season you havenโt learned how to navigate yet. I wrote something about this ๐๐ฝ https://x.com/princess_mmasi/status/2095224649168630019?s=46
โค41โ3๐2

Channel
@Princess_mmasi
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
13,316subscribers
+247 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002261461841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Princess_mmasi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 44 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Princess_mmasi |
Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:54 | 13,316 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 13,332 | -19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 13,351 | -15 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 13,366 | -15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 13,381 | -15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:06 | 13,396 | -7 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:48 | 13,403 | -25 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 13,428 | +11 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 07:54 | 13,417 | -88 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:02 | 13,505 | -140 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 13,645 | +631 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 13,014 | -34 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 13,048 | -17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 13,065 | +59 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 13,006 | -38 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:35 | 13,044 | -27 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 13,071 | -30 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 13,101 | -27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:26 | 13,128 | -28 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 13,156 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
4,763 reactions across 37 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 3,381 | 71.0% | |
| ๐ฅ | 801 | 16.8% | |
| ๐ | 297 | 6.24% | |
| ๐ฏ | 105 | 2.20% | |
| ๐ | 66 | 1.39% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 38 | 0.798% | |
| ๐คฏ | 34 | 0.714% | |
| ๐ | 22 | 0.462% | |
| โ | 10 | 0.21% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.126% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.042% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 1 | 0.021% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 4,763 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @Princess_mmasi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Maybe youโre not suddenly a bad trader. Maybe youโre just in a season you havenโt learned how to navigate yet. I wrote something about this ๐๐ฝ https://x.com/princess_mmasi/status/2095224649168630019?s=46
โค41โ3๐2
One purchase, Two challenges and even more rewards waiting๐ฅ @GoatFunded โs Summer Sale gives you Buy One, Get One FREE + 40% OFF upon reaching a payout with code BOGO40. And with GOAT Points, your trading can unlock even more perks, from free challenges and extra drawdown to bigger accounts. If youโve been waiting to get funded, this is a pretty good time to make your move and trade with the greatest๐ Get startedโฆ
โค23๐1
There are still four months left. And even if four months isnโt enough to reach the entire goal, it is more than enough time to become a completely different person by January 2027. Because while someone else waits for January 1st to finally start, you could enter the new year with four months of experience, mistakes, discipline and progress already behind you. January isnโt the magical starting point and Septembeโฆ
โค212๐ฅ32๐6๐6๐ฏ1
September has a funny way of making people feel like the year is already over Maybe you started 2026 determined to make your first $1,000, become profitable in trading, buy your first car, hit your first six figures in sales, or finally start that businessโฆ and somehow, youโre not there yet.
โค92๐ฅ17๐6
I wish I could completely switch off from work for a while, but apparently I chose to be a trader with an XAUUSD swing position running while I travel the world ๐ซ ๐
โค258๐ฅ34๐ฏ31๐3๐3๐2๐ 2๐ฅฐ1
Video, posted without a caption
โค62๐12๐ฅ6๐ฅฐ5๐3
How was todayโs Live trading session?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
๐ฅ29โค25๐3๐2๐ฅฐ2๐1
Join In https://meet.google.com/xbk-cfis-gdv
๐38โค15๐ฅฐ2๐ฅ1
Meanwhile, the market has been been misbehaving for a while now. How about a market review tonight to gain more insights on directional bias? Whoโs in?
โค251๐54๐ฅ20๐ฏ9๐3
$27k on XAUUSD๐ ๐ My longest swing trade this year Iโve never held profits for this long๐
๐ฅ123โค76๐8๐7๐คฏ2โคโ๐ฅ1
I needed a break, and I took it๐โ๏ธ
โค236๐ฏ32๐ฅ19๐ฅฐ13๐ 4
WE ARE PRINTING ON GOLD TOGETHER ๐ฅ Risk to Reward๐ซถ
โค120๐17๐ฅฐ8๐2๐ฅ2๐2
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Princess_mmasi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How was todayโs Live trading session?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Over 4000 of you were live with me๐ฅ How was todayโs live session?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How was tonightโs Live trading session????
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โTRADE WITH DIVYA๐ฒ๐โ (@Princess_mmasi), 13,316 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Princess_mmasi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.