Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Airdrop Updates

Channel

Airdrop Updates

@PrivateCoderz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,689subscribers

-332 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001969679920
TypeChannel
Username@PrivateCoderz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PrivateCoderz

Growth

10,68911,02110,85522 August 2026 — 11,021 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,943 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,894 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,857 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,818 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,726 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,689 subscribers22 August 202630 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -332. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,639–11,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 11:0510,689-37
29 Aug 2026, 09:0710,726-53
28 Aug 2026, 08:2910,779-39
27 Aug 2026, 05:0410,818-39
26 Aug 2026, 01:5610,857-37
25 Aug 2026, 02:0210,894-49
23 Aug 2026, 18:1710,943-78
22 Aug 2026, 15:1511,021first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.12%
avg views ÷ 10,689 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held54 (6 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total6,473
Reactions total620
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

620 reactions across 46 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰10216.5%
9515.3%
👏8914.4%
👍8714.0%
🎉8513.7%
🔥8413.5%
🤩7712.4%
10.161%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 620reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC26 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇻🇪 President Trump says US entered "the biggest oil deal" in history with Venezuela that will double American oil reserves. 🤝💰 @PrivateCoderz

🔥6👍3👏2🤩2🎉1

28 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC48 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Bitcoin falls under $77,000 📉 $200,000,000 longs liquidated from the crypto market in the past 60 minutes. 🌊 @PrivateCoderz

🎉5👏32👍2🔥1🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC58 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Odds of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates next month surge to 49%. 📈💰 @PrivateCoderz

🎉3👍3👏2🤩2🥰21🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC73 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 S&P 500 erases today's losses and turns green. 📈 @PrivateCoderz

4🔥3👏2🤩2🎉1👍1

28 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC88 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Fed Chair Kevin Warsh says consumer spending remains healthy and labor markets are stable. 💪 #economy @PrivateCoderz

👏43🎉2🥰2👍1🔥1🤩1

28 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC91 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says the 4 big meat processors are a "nasty Monopoly" 😠 that make life "miserable" 😩 for US farmers. @PrivateCoderz

3👍3👏2🔥2🥰2🎉1🤩1

28 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC91 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Federal judge rules Trump administration violated Anthropic's First Amendment rights by labeling it a supply-chain risk. ⚖️ @PrivateCoderz

4👍4👏2🤩2🥰2🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 01:25 UTC104 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: $81,000 Bitcoin 🚀📈 @PrivateCoderz

🔥3🥰32👍2🎉1👏1

27 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC106 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇦🇪 Trump family's new crypto bank is backed by UAE's "Spy Sheikh" Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan. 💰🤫 @PrivateCoderz

👏3🔥3🎉2👍2🤩2🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC105 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇻🇪 Trump administration close to securing "massive" deal to take ownership stakes in Venezuelan oil fields that could more than double US oil reserves. ⛽️💰 @PrivateCoderz

4🎉3🥰3👍2🤩2🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC106 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: $13 trillion Charles Schwab to add Solana ☀️, Avalanche 🏔️, and Chainlink 🔗 trading to Schwab Crypto accounts. @PrivateCoderz

4🥰4🔥3👍2🤩1

27 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC121 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: JPMorgan warns a large-scale food supply crisis could hit within the next year. 🚨 🍎🌾 @PrivateCoderz

🥰5🎉3🔥3🤩21👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @PrivateCoderz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Payouts Helper™
@PayoutsHelper · 43,749
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 28 August 2026
Mystery Airdrops
@MysteryAirdrops · 56,200
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 23 August 2026
igga 💸
@nigga1z · 59,015
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 23 August 2026
Airdrop Lite
@airdrops_lite · 58,058
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Airdrop Updates” (@PrivateCoderz), 10,689 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrivateCoderz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.